Hypertension Score

18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.03 percent of the residents in 18641 has some form of health insurance. 43.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.14 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18641 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,305 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18641. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,432 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,070 health care providers accessible to residents in 18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania

Hypertension Score 79
People Score 37
Provider Score 90
Hospital Score 47
Travel Score 62

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

18641 Pittston Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Pittston, PA (ZIP Code 18641)

This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the landscape of hypertension management within Pittston, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 18641), focusing on primary care physician availability, resource accessibility, and the overall quality of care offered. We will assess the key factors influencing hypertension control, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, ultimately generating a hypothetical “Hypertension Score” ranking to guide patient decision-making.

The foundation of effective hypertension management rests upon accessible and responsive primary care. Within Pittston, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical determinant of care quality. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced patient follow-up, and potentially compromised blood pressure control. Data analysis must ascertain the precise ratio for this ZIP code, comparing it to both regional and national averages. A concerningly high ratio warrants closer scrutiny, potentially indicating a need for increased recruitment of primary care physicians or expanded access to existing practices.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians is equally important. Are physicians clustered in specific areas, leaving certain neighborhoods underserved? This spatial analysis reveals potential health disparities and highlights areas where targeted interventions are needed. Access to transportation, particularly for elderly or low-income patients, further complicates this issue. Practices located near public transportation hubs, or those offering patient transportation services, are inherently more accessible.

Several primary care practices within Pittston likely stand out in their approach to hypertension management. Identifying these “standout practices” requires a multi-faceted evaluation. This includes assessing the availability of comprehensive blood pressure monitoring tools, such as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), which provides a more accurate picture of a patient's blood pressure fluctuations throughout the day. Practices employing certified hypertension specialists or those with dedicated hypertension clinics should also be recognized.

Furthermore, the utilization of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment is crucial. Practices adhering to the latest recommendations from organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) demonstrate a commitment to optimal patient care. This includes the implementation of standardized protocols for blood pressure measurement, medication management, and lifestyle counseling.

Telemedicine, especially post-COVID-19, has emerged as a significant tool in improving access to care, particularly for chronic conditions like hypertension. Examining the level of telemedicine adoption within Pittston's primary care practices is vital. Practices offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals are better equipped to manage patients remotely, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. This is especially beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in remote areas. The quality of telemedicine services, including ease of use, technical support, and integration with existing electronic health records, should be assessed.

The intricate link between mental health and hypertension demands careful consideration. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Primary care practices that integrate mental health resources into their hypertension management programs are better positioned to address the holistic needs of their patients. This includes offering on-site mental health counseling, providing referrals to mental health specialists, and educating patients about the connection between mental well-being and cardiovascular health.

The presence of community resources, such as support groups, educational programs, and access to healthy food options, also influences hypertension control. Practices that actively partner with local organizations to promote healthy lifestyles and provide patient education demonstrate a commitment to preventative care. These partnerships can include collaborations with local pharmacies, fitness centers, and community health centers.

To create a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" ranking, we would assign weights to each of the above factors. Physician-to-patient ratio, access to specialized care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration would be weighted heavily. Other factors, such as practice hours, insurance acceptance, and patient reviews, would also contribute to the overall score. This score would then be used to rank the primary care practices within Pittston, providing patients with a valuable tool for making informed decisions about their healthcare.

Data collection for this analysis would involve a combination of methods. Publicly available data sources, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, would provide information on physician demographics and healthcare utilization. Direct outreach to primary care practices through surveys and interviews would gather detailed information on their services, resources, and practices. Patient reviews and online ratings would also be considered.

The final "Hypertension Score" would be presented in a clear and concise format, allowing patients to easily compare practices and identify those best suited to their needs. This ranking would not only inform patient choices but also incentivize practices to improve their hypertension management strategies. The ultimate goal is to improve blood pressure control rates, reduce cardiovascular events, and enhance the overall health and well-being of the residents of Pittston.

The implementation of this analysis should be an ongoing process. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies and treatment approaches emerging regularly. The "Hypertension Score" ranking should be updated periodically to reflect these changes and ensure its continued relevance. This requires a commitment to continuous data collection, analysis, and refinement.

In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of hypertension management in Pittston, Pennsylvania, is essential for improving patient outcomes. By assessing physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources, we can identify areas of strength and weakness and develop strategies to enhance the quality of care. This detailed analysis provides a foundation for understanding the complexities of hypertension management in Pittston, and can be used to inform patients and providers alike.

Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Pittston and beyond? Explore the power of spatial data and gain deeper insights into physician availability and resource distribution.

**Click here to explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome!**

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania

You may also like

18642, Duryea, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 1.46 Miles

Total Population:

18640, Pittston, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 2.33 Miles

Total Population:

18643, Pittston, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 3.70 Miles

Total Population:

18644, Wyoming, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 5.83 Miles

Total Population:

18653, Ransom, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 6.01 Miles

Total Population:

18615, Falls, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 8.89 Miles

Total Population:

18602, Bear Creek, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 10.34 Miles

Total Population:

18612, Dallas, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 11.54 Miles

Total Population:

18651, Plymouth, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 18641: 12.19 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 18641, Pittston, Pennsylvania