18814, Burlington, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 18814, Burlington, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 18814 has some form of health insurance. 35.75 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.13 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18814 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 56 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18814. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 33 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,907 health care providers accessible to residents in 18814, Burlington, Pennsylvania.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 18814 & Burlington Primary Care

Analyzing the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP code 18814 and evaluating primary care availability in Burlington necessitates a multifaceted approach. We will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight noteworthy practices, assess telemedicine integration, and explore the presence of mental health resources, culminating in a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" assessment. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to manage hypertension within the specified geographic areas.

**18814: A Microcosm of Hypertension Care**

ZIP code 18814, a specific geographic area, serves as our initial focus. Understanding the local healthcare infrastructure is paramount. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to appointment delays, reduced time spent with patients, and potential gaps in preventative care, including hypertension management. Conversely, a low ratio suggests better access to care. The exact physician-to-patient ratio in 18814 requires specific data acquisition, likely from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) or state medical boards. This ratio will form a foundational element of the Hypertension Score.

Identifying standout practices within 18814 involves scrutinizing their approach to hypertension management. This includes examining their patient education programs, the use of evidence-based guidelines, and their commitment to regular monitoring. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, providing resources for lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise), and offering robust medication management protocols will score favorably. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and their utilization for population health management, including identifying and tracking hypertensive patients, is another crucial factor.

Telemedicine's role in hypertension care has grown significantly, especially in remote areas. Practices in 18814 that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management via telehealth platforms, will receive a higher score. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas. The availability of telehealth services also contributes to patient convenience and adherence to treatment plans.

The integration of mental health resources is often overlooked in hypertension management, yet it is vitally important. Chronic stress and anxiety can significantly impact blood pressure. Practices that collaborate with mental health professionals, offering integrated care or referrals to therapists and psychiatrists, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient well-being. This integration, or lack thereof, directly impacts the Hypertension Score.

**Burlington: Primary Care Landscape and Accessibility**

Shifting our focus to Burlington, the assessment of primary care availability is crucial. The overall number of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Burlington, compared to the population, directly influences access to care. A shortage of PCPs can create bottlenecks, delaying appointments and potentially hindering early detection and management of hypertension. Data from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or local health departments will be essential for this analysis.

Accessibility extends beyond the raw physician count. Factors like insurance acceptance, the availability of evening and weekend appointments, and the presence of multilingual staff all contribute to the ease with which patients can access primary care. Practices that prioritize patient convenience and inclusivity will be viewed more favorably.

The adoption of innovative care models, such as patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), can improve the quality and coordination of care. PCMHs emphasize a team-based approach, with PCPs, nurses, and other healthcare professionals working collaboratively to manage patient health. Practices adopting this model often demonstrate better outcomes in chronic disease management, including hypertension.

Telemedicine’s influence in Burlington mirrors its importance in 18814. The availability of virtual consultations and remote monitoring capabilities within primary care practices significantly impacts the accessibility of hypertension management. Burlington practices that utilize telemedicine effectively will receive a higher score.

**Hypertension Score: Methodology and Considerations**

The Hypertension Score will be a composite metric, weighing various factors. The physician-to-patient ratio will be a significant component, as will the quality of care provided by standout practices. Telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and the overall accessibility of primary care will also be considered. The weighting of each factor will be determined based on its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension management.

Data collection will be a challenge. Gathering specific information on physician practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration requires diligent research, potentially including surveys, phone calls, and public record searches. The accuracy of the score will depend on the completeness and reliability of the data.

The score is not a static measure. It will change as healthcare practices evolve, new technologies emerge, and patient needs change. Regular updates are essential to ensure the score remains relevant and reflects the current state of hypertension care.

**Conclusion: A Call to Action**

Understanding the landscape of hypertension care in 18814 and Burlington requires a comprehensive analysis of physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources. The resulting Hypertension Score provides a valuable tool for assessing the accessibility and quality of care. This analysis is a starting point.

To visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide interactive visualizations of physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data, enabling a more informed assessment of hypertension care in these areas.