18831, Milan, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 18831, Milan, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.92 percent of the residents in 18831 has some form of health insurance. 51.82 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.19 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18831 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 175 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18831. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 289 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,883 health care providers accessible to residents in 18831, Milan, Pennsylvania.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 18831 Doctors & Milan Primary Care

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP Code 18831, and the broader context of primary care availability in Milan, aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to patients. We will assess the quality of care, accessibility, and supporting infrastructure, culminating in a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" evaluation. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all critical factors in effective hypertension control.

The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in the availability of primary care physicians. ZIP Code 18831, and the surrounding region, must be examined for the density of primary care providers per capita. This ratio is a critical indicator of access. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced opportunities for preventative care, and a higher likelihood of uncontrolled hypertension. Data sources like the US Census Bureau, combined with state medical licensing boards, are essential to accurately calculate this ratio. Milan’s overall primary care availability, including specialists, must be assessed in conjunction with 18831's data. The availability of specialists, particularly cardiologists and nephrologists, is also crucial for managing complex cases and potential complications.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care provided by primary care practices is paramount. Assessing this involves evaluating various factors, including the adoption of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. This includes adherence to the latest guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Practices should be evaluated on their use of standardized protocols for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, and treatment. This includes the regular use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) when appropriate, and the implementation of lifestyle modification counseling.

Standout practices within the region can be identified through several avenues. Patient reviews and satisfaction surveys offer valuable insights into patient experiences. Hospitals and healthcare systems may have internal quality metrics that can be considered. Analyzing the use of electronic health records (EHRs) and their integration with patient portals is also important. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively can facilitate better communication between providers and patients, improve medication adherence, and streamline care coordination. The ability of a practice to demonstrate a commitment to patient education, including providing resources on diet, exercise, and stress management, is also a key differentiator.

Telemedicine has emerged as a significant tool in hypertension management, particularly in areas with limited access to care. The adoption rate of telemedicine within 18831 and Milan should be assessed. This includes the availability of virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring programs, and the use of patient portals for communication and medication refills. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve access to care, reduce the burden on patients, and enhance medication adherence. The technical infrastructure supporting telemedicine, including reliable internet access and user-friendly platforms, is also a critical consideration.

The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Chronic stress and anxiety can contribute to elevated blood pressure and complicate treatment. The availability of mental health resources within the region is therefore a crucial component of comprehensive hypertension care. This includes access to psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and support groups. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care model are better equipped to address the holistic needs of patients with hypertension. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals can improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications.

The "Hypertension Score" for 18831 doctors and Milan primary care would be a composite metric, weighting the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio would constitute a significant portion of the score, reflecting the accessibility of care. The quality of care, as measured by adherence to guidelines, the use of EHRs, and patient satisfaction, would be another critical component. The adoption of telemedicine and the availability of mental health resources would also contribute to the overall score. The score would provide a comparative assessment of the resources available to patients with hypertension, enabling them to make informed decisions about their care.

The overall score would be presented as a numerical value, with a corresponding qualitative rating (e.g., Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor). A detailed breakdown of the score, outlining the performance of each practice across the key metrics, would be provided to facilitate transparency and allow for targeted improvements. The analysis would also include recommendations for improving hypertension management within the region. This could include suggestions for increasing the number of primary care providers, promoting the adoption of telemedicine, and expanding access to mental health services.

The findings of this analysis, including the "Hypertension Score" and associated data, can be visualized and explored using advanced mapping tools. The spatial representation of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and health outcomes can provide valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for improving hypertension management.

For a dynamic and interactive visualization of the data, including physician locations, patient demographics, and key health metrics, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize the "Hypertension Score" and its components geographically, allowing you to identify areas with the greatest needs and opportunities for improvement.