19001, Abington, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 19001, Abington, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.02 percent of the residents in 19001 has some form of health insurance. 24.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.91 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19001 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 4,819 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19001. An estimate of 32 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,549 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 32,000 health care providers accessible to residents in 19001, Abington, Pennsylvania.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 19001 & Abington Primary Care

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP Code 19001 (Abington, Pennsylvania) and the broader context of primary care availability in the surrounding Abington area. We aim to assess the quality of care, focusing on factors crucial for effective hypertension control, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the resources available to patients in this region.

The initial assessment involves understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A favorable ratio, indicating a higher concentration of primary care physicians relative to the population, generally suggests better access to care and potentially improved outcomes for conditions like hypertension. Conversely, a lower ratio might indicate longer wait times for appointments, potentially hindering proactive management and regular monitoring crucial for hypertension control. The specific ratio for 19001 requires investigation, but we can infer that the surrounding Abington area, with its suburban character, likely possesses a reasonable, though not necessarily exceptional, physician-to-patient ratio. This assumption needs verification through data analysis to confirm or refute it.

Beyond raw numbers, the characteristics of primary care practices in 19001 and Abington are critical. We need to examine the size of practices, the types of services offered, and the overall approach to patient care. Large, multi-specialty practices often provide a wider range of services under one roof, potentially improving coordination of care for patients with hypertension who may also require management for other conditions. Smaller, independent practices may offer a more personalized experience, fostering stronger patient-physician relationships, which can be beneficial for adherence to treatment plans. The presence of specialized hypertension clinics or programs within practices would significantly elevate the quality score.

Standout practices are those that demonstrate exceptional commitment to hypertension management. This includes practices that actively utilize evidence-based guidelines, offer comprehensive patient education, and implement robust systems for monitoring and follow-up. Such practices often employ electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, generate reminders for medication refills and appointments, and facilitate communication between patients and providers. We will need to identify practices that actively measure and report key performance indicators (KPIs) related to hypertension control, such as the percentage of patients achieving target blood pressure levels.

The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and digital health tools, has the potential to significantly improve hypertension management, particularly for patients with limited mobility or those living in geographically underserved areas. Practices that offer telemedicine options can provide more convenient access to care, facilitate more frequent monitoring of blood pressure, and enhance patient engagement. The extent of telemedicine adoption in 19001 and Abington practices will be a key indicator of their commitment to providing accessible and patient-centered care.

The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as essential for effective hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Practices that provide access to mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This includes screening for mental health conditions, providing counseling and support, and coordinating care between primary care physicians and mental health professionals.

Another aspect to consider is the availability of support groups and educational programs for patients with hypertension. These resources can empower patients to take an active role in managing their condition, improve their understanding of their medications and lifestyle modifications, and provide a sense of community and support. Practices that actively promote and facilitate these resources are likely to achieve better outcomes for their patients.

Data on the use of specific medications and treatment protocols is also important. Are practices adhering to the latest guidelines for hypertension management? Do they utilize a range of medications to effectively control blood pressure? The analysis of medication prescribing patterns can reveal valuable insights into the quality of care.

The analysis will also consider the demographic characteristics of the patient population served by the practices in 19001 and Abington. Are there disparities in care based on race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status? Addressing health disparities is crucial for ensuring equitable access to high-quality hypertension management for all residents.

The assessment will also include an evaluation of patient satisfaction. Patient feedback provides valuable insights into the quality of care and the overall patient experience. Practices that actively solicit and respond to patient feedback are more likely to identify areas for improvement and enhance patient satisfaction.

Ultimately, the goal is to create a comprehensive ‘Hypertension Score’ analysis, providing a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of hypertension management in 19001 and the surrounding Abington area. This score will be based on a combination of quantitative data and qualitative assessments, reflecting the various factors discussed above.

This comprehensive analysis will reveal the strengths and weaknesses of hypertension management in the Abington area. To visualize this data and understand the geographical distribution of resources, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps available on CartoChrome. These maps provide a powerful tool for understanding the spatial relationships between healthcare providers, patient populations, and other relevant factors, allowing for a deeper understanding of the landscape of hypertension care in the 19001 area.