The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 19014, Aston, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.37 percent of the residents in 19014 has some form of health insurance. 27.98 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 83.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19014 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,678 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19014. An estimate of 13 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,438 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 17,278 health care providers accessible to residents in 19014, Aston, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19014, Aston, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 90 |
---|---|
People Score | 45 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 69 |
19014 | Aston | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypertension score assessment for primary care physicians within the 19014 ZIP code, focusing on factors relevant to patient care and accessibility. This assessment considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in effectively managing hypertension.
The foundation of a strong hypertension management program rests on the availability of primary care physicians. In 19014, understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. A high ratio, meaning a large number of patients per physician, can strain resources, potentially leading to shorter appointment times and less individualized care. Conversely, a lower ratio generally indicates greater accessibility and the potential for more comprehensive patient management. Determining the exact ratio requires a thorough review of the physician directories, insurance provider networks, and patient population data within the specified ZIP code. This information, when compiled, allows for a preliminary assessment of the access challenges patients might face.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care within Aston, PA, is crucial. Identifying standout practices involves assessing their commitment to hypertension management. This includes reviewing the adoption of evidence-based guidelines, the use of electronic health records for tracking patient progress, and the implementation of patient education programs. Practices demonstrating a proactive approach, such as regularly monitoring blood pressure, providing lifestyle counseling, and offering medication management support, would receive higher scores. This evaluation should also consider patient satisfaction surveys and online reviews, which provide valuable insights into the patient experience.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in hypertension management, particularly in improving access to care. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals, are likely to score higher. Telemedicine can be especially beneficial for patients with mobility issues, those living in geographically isolated areas, or those seeking convenient follow-up appointments. The extent of telemedicine adoption, including the types of services offered and the ease of use for patients, should be carefully evaluated.
Hypertension is often intertwined with mental health. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within a primary care setting is a critical factor. Practices that have integrated mental health services, either through in-house providers or partnerships with external mental health professionals, are better equipped to provide holistic care. This includes offering screening for mental health conditions, providing counseling services, and coordinating care with mental health specialists when necessary. The level of integration and the accessibility of these resources are essential considerations.
To assess the overall hypertension score, each practice should be evaluated across these key areas. The physician-to-patient ratio provides a baseline understanding of access. The quality of care, including the use of evidence-based guidelines and patient education programs, reflects the practice's commitment to hypertension management. The adoption of telemedicine enhances accessibility and convenience. The availability of mental health resources addresses the complex interplay between hypertension and mental well-being.
A scoring system could be developed based on these factors, with each practice receiving a numerical score. This score would reflect the practice's overall performance in managing hypertension. Practices with higher scores would be considered to be more effective in providing comprehensive care. This analysis is not a simple one. It requires gathering data from multiple sources and evaluating the information carefully.
The process begins with compiling a list of primary care physicians in the 19014 ZIP code. This list should include contact information, insurance affiliations, and any publicly available information about the practice. The next step is to gather data on the physician-to-patient ratio. This can be done by contacting the practices directly or by consulting publicly available data sources.
The assessment of quality of care requires a more in-depth investigation. This includes reviewing the practice's website, patient portal, and any publicly available information about its services. It also involves gathering information on the practice's use of evidence-based guidelines, patient education programs, and medication management support.
The evaluation of telemedicine adoption requires a review of the practice's telemedicine offerings. This includes the types of services offered, the platform used, and the ease of use for patients. The assessment of mental health resources requires identifying the practice's mental health services, either in-house or through partnerships.
Once the data has been collected, the practices can be scored based on the factors mentioned above. The scores can then be used to rank the practices, providing a valuable resource for patients seeking primary care in Aston, PA. This ranking could be used to guide patients in choosing a primary care physician.
This analysis is a snapshot in time. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and practices are continuously adapting to new technologies and treatment approaches. Regular updates to this assessment are necessary to ensure its accuracy and relevance. The information provided should be considered as a starting point for patients seeking primary care in Aston.
To gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of primary care physicians in the 19014 ZIP code and to visualize the data discussed, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful platform for visualizing geographic data and can be instrumental in understanding the accessibility of healthcare resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like