The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 19066, Merion Station, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.43 percent of the residents in 19066 has some form of health insurance. 25.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.61 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19066 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,541 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 390 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19066. An estimate of 91 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,149 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 96,955 health care providers accessible to residents in 19066, Merion Station, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19066, Merion Station, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 99 |
---|---|
People Score | 83 |
Provider Score | 98 |
Hospital Score | 45 |
Travel Score | 76 |
19066 | Merion Station | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Merion Station (ZIP Code 19066)
Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care for hypertension management in Merion Station (ZIP Code 19066) requires a multifaceted approach. We will examine the landscape of local physicians, assess their resources, and consider the overall patient experience. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the area's capacity to effectively address hypertension, a significant public health concern.
The core of effective hypertension management lies in accessible and skilled primary care physicians. In Merion Station, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can strain resources, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially less individualized care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater availability, potentially facilitating more frequent check-ups and proactive intervention. Publicly available data on physician distribution, combined with population estimates for the ZIP code, allows for a preliminary assessment of this ratio. Further research into the patient panels of individual practices provides a more granular understanding of the workload each physician carries.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care is paramount. This involves evaluating the practices' commitment to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. Key indicators include the adoption of standardized protocols for blood pressure monitoring, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data and medication adherence, and the implementation of patient education programs. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, providing them with the knowledge and tools to manage their condition, tend to achieve better outcomes. This includes offering readily accessible information on lifestyle modifications, such as diet and exercise, and providing support for medication adherence.
Identifying standout practices within Merion Station is crucial. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to excellence in hypertension management, setting a benchmark for others. Key characteristics of these practices might include a proactive approach to patient screening, the implementation of robust EHR systems for data tracking and analysis, and a focus on patient-centered care. They may also have a dedicated team of nurses or medical assistants who specialize in hypertension management, providing additional support and education to patients. Furthermore, their success is often reflected in lower rates of uncontrolled hypertension among their patient population.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, particularly in the context of chronic disease management. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor blood pressure remotely, and provide medication refills online can significantly improve patient access to care and convenience. Practices that embrace telemedicine can potentially reach a wider patient base, especially those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. The level of telemedicine adoption, including the types of services offered and the ease of use for patients, is a key factor in assessing the overall quality of hypertension care in Merion Station.
The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is undeniable. Hypertension is often exacerbated by stress, anxiety, and depression. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an important consideration. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, either through in-house providers or through referral networks, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups, as well as the ability to screen for mental health conditions and provide appropriate interventions.
Furthermore, the availability of ancillary services, such as on-site pharmacies, laboratory services, and specialized cardiology consultations, can streamline the patient experience and improve care coordination. Practices that offer these services can reduce the burden on patients, making it easier for them to adhere to their treatment plans. The efficiency of care coordination, including the communication between primary care physicians and specialists, is another crucial factor in achieving optimal outcomes.
Addressing social determinants of health is also essential. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, and safe housing can significantly impact a patient's ability to manage their hypertension. Practices that are aware of these factors and actively work to address them, either through direct assistance or through referrals to community resources, are better positioned to provide comprehensive care. This may involve connecting patients with food banks, providing assistance with transportation, or advocating for policies that promote health equity.
Evaluating the affordability of care is another important aspect. The cost of medications, office visits, and diagnostic tests can be a significant barrier to accessing care, particularly for low-income individuals. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, offer financial assistance programs, and provide transparent pricing information are more likely to ensure that all patients have access to the care they need.
Finally, patient satisfaction is a critical indicator of the quality of care. Gathering feedback from patients through surveys, online reviews, and other channels provides valuable insights into their experiences. Practices that actively solicit and respond to patient feedback are better equipped to identify areas for improvement and enhance the overall patient experience.
In conclusion, assessing the hypertension score for primary care in Merion Station (ZIP Code 19066) requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and patient satisfaction. By analyzing these factors, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the area's capacity to effectively manage hypertension and improve patient outcomes.
For a visual representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data points, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows you to visualize the landscape of primary care in Merion Station and gain a deeper understanding of the resources available to address hypertension.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like