19116, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 19116, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.96 percent of the residents in 19116 has some form of health insurance. 40.15 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.69 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19116 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,717 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 516 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19116. An estimate of 108 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,380 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 100,145 health care providers accessible to residents in 19116, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Philadelphia (19116) & Primary Care

Analyzing hypertension management within Philadelphia, specifically focusing on the 19116 ZIP code and the broader primary care landscape, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis, a "Hypertension Score," aims to assess the quality and accessibility of care related to this pervasive health concern. We will examine factors including physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the integration of mental health resources, ultimately providing a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within this critical area of healthcare.

The 19116 ZIP code, encompassing areas like Bustleton and Somerton, presents a unique demographic profile. Understanding the age distribution, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of chronic conditions within this area is crucial for tailoring healthcare strategies. This demographic data, alongside publicly available health records, can provide a baseline for evaluating the effectiveness of hypertension management programs. It's essential to consider the potential impact of social determinants of health, such as access to healthy food and safe environments for physical activity, on hypertension control.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised continuity of care. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and professional organizations like the Philadelphia County Medical Society should be analyzed to determine the physician density within 19116 and compare it to citywide and national averages. This comparative analysis will help identify areas where physician shortages may be impacting hypertension management.

Primary care availability across Philadelphia is a critical factor. The presence of robust primary care networks, including family medicine, internal medicine, and geriatric practices, is essential for early detection, ongoing monitoring, and patient education regarding hypertension. Assessing the geographic distribution of primary care practices, including their proximity to public transportation and accessibility for individuals with disabilities, is paramount. This evaluation should also consider the types of insurance accepted by these practices, ensuring that affordable care is available to all residents, regardless of their financial situation.

Identifying standout practices within 19116 and across Philadelphia is crucial. These practices often demonstrate exemplary hypertension management through evidence-based protocols, patient education initiatives, and a commitment to continuous quality improvement. Examining their patient outcomes, adherence rates to medication regimens, and patient satisfaction scores can reveal best practices that can be replicated across the city. This analysis should also consider the use of electronic health records (EHRs) and their ability to facilitate data-driven decision-making.

Telemedicine adoption is a rapidly evolving aspect of healthcare delivery. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of blood pressure, and online patient education can significantly improve hypertension management, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in underserved areas. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within practices in 19116 and Philadelphia, including the types of platforms used, the availability of technical support, and patient satisfaction with these services, is vital.

The integration of mental health resources is another critical element. Hypertension and mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, are often comorbid. Recognizing and addressing these co-occurring conditions can improve patient outcomes. This assessment should examine the availability of mental health professionals within primary care practices, the presence of integrated behavioral health programs, and the referral pathways for patients needing specialized mental health care.

A comprehensive Hypertension Score should incorporate these factors. It would involve a weighted scoring system, assigning points based on physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The score would provide a quantitative measure of the quality and accessibility of hypertension management within 19116 and across Philadelphia. The score would be a dynamic measure, updated regularly to reflect changes in healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.

Furthermore, the analysis must consider the impact of health disparities. Hypertension disproportionately affects certain racial and ethnic groups. The Hypertension Score should incorporate data on health disparities to ensure that healthcare resources are equitably distributed and that culturally competent care is provided to all patients. This includes assessing the diversity of the healthcare workforce, the availability of translated materials, and the cultural sensitivity of patient education programs.

The analysis should also consider the role of community health initiatives. Partnerships between primary care practices, community organizations, and public health agencies can play a crucial role in hypertension prevention and management. This assessment should identify the presence of such partnerships, the types of programs offered, and their impact on patient outcomes. These initiatives may include blood pressure screenings, educational workshops, and support groups.

In conclusion, evaluating hypertension management within Philadelphia (19116) and the broader primary care landscape requires a comprehensive and data-driven approach. The Hypertension Score, incorporating factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, provides a framework for assessing the quality and accessibility of care. By identifying areas of strength and weakness, this analysis can inform strategies to improve hypertension management and ultimately improve the health and well-being of Philadelphia residents.

Want to visualize this data and explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources in Philadelphia? Use CartoChrome maps to create interactive visualizations and uncover actionable insights.