19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.49 percent of the residents in 19147 has some form of health insurance. 23.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.82 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19147 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,540 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19147. An estimate of 86 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,792 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 91,179 health care providers accessible to residents in 19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 19147 & Philadelphia Primary Care

Analyzing hypertension management within Philadelphia's 19147 ZIP code and the broader primary care landscape requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will assess key factors influencing hypertension control, including physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health resources, culminating in a "Hypertension Score" assessment. We will consider the overall impact on patient outcomes.

The foundation of effective hypertension management rests upon accessible primary care. In 19147, physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and publicly available databases on physician specialties and practice locations must be aggregated. This data reveals the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the ZIP code, compared to the estimated population. A lower ratio, indicating more patients per PCP, can hinder timely appointments, thorough check-ups, and consistent follow-up, all crucial for hypertension control. The analysis should account for the presence of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who often play a significant role in primary care delivery.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care practices in 19147 significantly impacts hypertension management. We need to assess factors such as practice accreditation (e.g., NCQA recognition), the availability of on-site diagnostic tools (e.g., ambulatory blood pressure monitoring), and the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment. Practices demonstrating a commitment to patient education, lifestyle counseling, and medication adherence programs are crucial. Information on patient satisfaction scores, available through surveys and online reviews, provides further insight into the patient experience and the perceived quality of care.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis should evaluate the extent to which primary care practices in 19147 offer telehealth services, including virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management support. Telemedicine can enhance access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or busy schedules. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflows likely demonstrate a higher level of innovation and patient-centered care.

The interplay between hypertension and mental health is well-documented. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within or connected to primary care practices in 19147 is a critical consideration. This includes the presence of on-site behavioral health specialists, referral pathways to mental health providers, and collaborative care models that integrate mental and physical healthcare. Practices that prioritize mental health screening and treatment are better positioned to address the holistic needs of their patients.

To determine the "Hypertension Score" for 19147, a weighted scoring system should be employed. Each of the factors discussed—physician-to-patient ratio, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and access to mental health resources—should be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. For instance, a low physician-to-patient ratio might receive a high score, while practices with comprehensive telemedicine integration might receive an even higher score. The overall score will be a composite of these individual scores, providing a comprehensive assessment of the hypertension management landscape.

Extrapolating this analysis to the broader primary care availability in Philadelphia requires a similar methodology, but on a larger scale. Data collection would need to encompass all ZIP codes within the city, allowing for a comparative analysis of hypertension management across different neighborhoods. This city-wide analysis can highlight areas with the greatest needs and identify best practices that can be replicated across the healthcare system. It would also reveal disparities in access to care.

The analysis should also consider the impact of social determinants of health on hypertension control. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, and safe housing can significantly influence blood pressure. The analysis should incorporate data on these factors to provide a more nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by patients in different communities.

Standout practices within 19147, and potentially across Philadelphia, deserve specific recognition. These practices may excel in areas such as patient education, medication adherence programs, or the use of technology to improve patient outcomes. Highlighting these exemplary practices can serve as a model for other healthcare providers.

The ultimate goal of this analysis is to inform strategies for improving hypertension management in Philadelphia. This includes identifying areas for improvement, advocating for policy changes, and supporting the development of innovative healthcare models. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the current system, we can work towards ensuring that all residents have access to high-quality, comprehensive hypertension care.

To visualize and explore the data underlying this analysis, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful way to understand the distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas with high rates of hypertension, and track the impact of interventions over time.