29525, Clio, South Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 29525, Clio, South Carolina is 20 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.10 percent of the residents in 29525 has some form of health insurance. 51.83 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 44.67 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29525 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 349 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29525. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 360 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 681 health care providers accessible to residents in 29525, Clio, South Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Clio, South Carolina (ZIP Code 29525)

Analyzing hypertension management within Clio, South Carolina (ZIP Code 29525) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will assess the quality of primary care available, focusing on factors relevant to effective hypertension control, including physician accessibility, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the availability of supporting mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide an informed perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape, particularly as it relates to the management of hypertension.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental metric. A high ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can strain access, leading to delayed appointments and potentially less frequent monitoring, crucial for managing hypertension. Publicly available data from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the US Census Bureau, combined with information from professional directories, can provide an initial estimate. However, these figures alone don't tell the whole story. The actual availability of appointments, the acceptance of new patients, and the specific focus of each practice on chronic disease management are equally important.

Within Clio, the presence of a few primary care practices is likely. Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. Practices that have adopted electronic health records (EHRs) are often better equipped to manage chronic conditions. EHRs facilitate medication reconciliation, automated reminders for follow-up appointments, and the ability to track patient progress over time. Practices actively engaged in patient education, offering resources on lifestyle modifications like diet and exercise, and providing clear communication about medication adherence, are also likely to perform well in hypertension management.

Telemedicine adoption presents another key area of evaluation. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for medication management and routine follow-ups, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in rural areas. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and can potentially reduce the burden on in-person appointments, allowing for more efficient use of resources. The availability of remote blood pressure monitoring devices, integrated with telemedicine platforms, further enhances the ability to monitor patients' conditions effectively.

The connection between hypertension and mental health is undeniable. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is crucial. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, as well as programs that address stress management and promote mental well-being. Practices that integrate mental health screenings and referrals into their routine care demonstrate a holistic approach to patient health, contributing to better overall outcomes for individuals with hypertension.

Specific practices should be assessed based on their adherence to established clinical guidelines for hypertension management. This includes the use of evidence-based protocols for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care. Practices that regularly monitor blood pressure, conduct appropriate laboratory tests, and adjust medications based on patient response are more likely to achieve optimal blood pressure control. The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology consultations or diabetes education, can also contribute to a practice's overall effectiveness in managing hypertension.

Assessing the quality of care also involves evaluating patient satisfaction. Patient reviews and feedback can provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Practices with positive reviews, indicating clear communication, a caring environment, and effective management of patient concerns, are likely to be more successful in building strong patient-provider relationships, which is crucial for long-term adherence to treatment plans.

The geographical distribution of primary care practices within Clio should also be considered. Are practices located in areas that are easily accessible to the majority of the population? The availability of transportation options, such as public transportation or ride-sharing services, can impact access to care. Practices located in areas with limited transportation options may face challenges in reaching patients, particularly those with chronic conditions.

The integration of community resources is another important aspect of evaluating hypertension management. Practices that collaborate with local pharmacies, community health organizations, and support groups can provide patients with a more comprehensive network of support. These collaborations can facilitate medication adherence, provide educational resources, and promote healthy lifestyle choices.

In conclusion, evaluating hypertension management in Clio, South Carolina, requires a thorough assessment of various factors. The physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of technology like telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the adherence to clinical guidelines all play a crucial role. Identifying standout practices involves looking for those that prioritize patient education, offer convenient access to care, and integrate a holistic approach to patient well-being. By considering these factors, a more accurate understanding of the local healthcare landscape and its impact on hypertension management can be achieved.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Clio, including the geographical distribution of practices, access to resources, and potential areas for improvement, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their mapping tools can provide a comprehensive overview of the healthcare ecosystem, enabling informed decision-making and facilitating improvements in patient care.