29543, Fork, South Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 29543, Fork, South Carolina is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 78.67 percent of the residents in 29543 has some form of health insurance. 36.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.87 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29543 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 58 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29543. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 113 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 970 health care providers accessible to residents in 29543, Fork, South Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29543 and Primary Care in Fork

This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care services within ZIP code 29543, focusing on factors pertinent to hypertension management. It also considers the broader context of primary care access in the town of Fork, providing a comprehensive overview for residents and healthcare stakeholders. Our assessment utilizes a hypothetical “Hypertension Score,” a composite measure reflecting various aspects of care delivery, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support.

The foundation of our analysis rests on understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially, poorer management of chronic conditions like hypertension. Conversely, a higher ratio generally suggests better access. We'll need to ascertain the exact number of primary care physicians practicing within 29543 and the estimated population to calculate this crucial metric. This data, combined with information on the average patient load per physician, will significantly influence the Hypertension Score.

Beyond physician numbers, the operational characteristics of local practices are critical. Are practices accepting new patients? Do they offer extended hours, including evenings and weekends, to accommodate diverse schedules? Do they provide same-day appointments for urgent needs? These factors directly impact a patient's ability to receive timely care, a cornerstone of effective hypertension management. Practices with robust appointment scheduling systems, efficient patient flow, and a commitment to patient convenience will naturally receive higher scores.

The adoption of telemedicine represents another vital component. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly enhance hypertension care. It offers patients greater flexibility, reduces the need for travel, and facilitates more frequent communication with their physicians. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine technologies, especially for medication management, blood pressure monitoring, and patient education, will be viewed favorably in our scoring system. The extent to which these technologies are integrated into the practice workflow and patient experience will also be considered.

Furthermore, the availability of mental health resources is an increasingly important aspect of hypertension management. Studies have demonstrated a strong link between mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, and elevated blood pressure. Practices that proactively screen for mental health concerns, offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals will receive higher scores. This integration of mental and physical healthcare is essential for holistic patient well-being and improved hypertension outcomes.

Now, let's turn our attention to the specific context of Fork. Primary care availability in Fork, as a whole, may differ from the situation within 29543. Factors such as the geographic distribution of physicians, the presence of larger healthcare systems, and the availability of public transportation can all influence access to care. Analyzing the broader landscape of primary care in Fork will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing residents.

Within ZIP code 29543, it's crucial to identify any standout practices. These could be characterized by exceptional patient satisfaction scores, a strong emphasis on preventative care, innovative use of technology, or a demonstrated commitment to serving the community. Identifying these practices and highlighting their best practices can serve as a model for other providers and contribute to overall improvements in hypertension care. We would look for practices that have achieved recognition from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) or have received patient-generated feedback through platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals.

The hypothetical Hypertension Score would be calculated based on a weighted average of these factors. Physician-to-patient ratio might contribute a significant percentage, reflecting its fundamental impact on access. Practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources would each receive a weighting based on their relative importance. The final score would provide a numerical representation of the overall quality and accessibility of hypertension care within the specified geographic area.

Data collection for this analysis would involve a multi-pronged approach. Publicly available information, such as physician directories and healthcare facility websites, would provide initial insights. Patient surveys, if available, would offer valuable perspectives on their experiences. Direct outreach to local practices would be necessary to gather detailed information on their services, technology adoption, and mental health integration.

The analysis would also consider the socioeconomic characteristics of the population served by these practices. Factors such as income levels, insurance coverage rates, and the prevalence of chronic diseases can all influence the demand for healthcare services and the ability of patients to access them. Understanding these demographic factors is essential for tailoring healthcare interventions and ensuring equitable access to care.

The results of this Hypertension Score analysis can be used to inform various stakeholders. Residents can use the information to make informed decisions about their healthcare providers. Healthcare providers can use the analysis to identify areas for improvement and benchmark their performance against their peers. Policymakers can use the data to develop targeted interventions to address gaps in care and improve the overall health of the community.

In conclusion, a thorough assessment of primary care resources, incorporating physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, is essential for understanding and improving hypertension management within 29543 and the broader area of Fork. This comprehensive analysis provides a framework for evaluating the quality and accessibility of care, ultimately benefiting the health and well-being of the community.

Ready to visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and gain deeper insights into the healthcare landscape of 29543 and Fork? Explore the power of location intelligence with CartoChrome maps. **Click here to learn more and request a demo.**