The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 29682, Six Mile, South Carolina is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.53 percent of the residents in 29682 has some form of health insurance. 28.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.27 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29682 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 809 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29682. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 543 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,014 health care providers accessible to residents in 29682, Six Mile, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29682, Six Mile, South Carolina
Hypertension Score | 37 |
---|---|
People Score | 55 |
Provider Score | 34 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 55 |
29682 | Six Mile | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: ZIP Code 29682 & Primary Care in Six Mile
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of primary care availability and related factors impacting hypertension management within ZIP Code 29682, specifically focusing on the town of Six Mile, South Carolina. We will evaluate the landscape through the lens of a hypothetical "Hypertension Score," considering physician access, practice characteristics, and the availability of supporting resources crucial for effective hypertension control.
The foundation of any effective hypertension management strategy lies in accessible primary care. The physician-to-patient ratio within 29682 is a critical starting point. While precise figures fluctuate, understanding the ratio provides a baseline for evaluating access. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to easier access to appointments and ongoing care. Conversely, a higher ratio can create challenges, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses, less frequent follow-ups, and ultimately, poorer blood pressure control. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards can provide this crucial data point.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of physicians matters. Are primary care physicians concentrated in specific areas within the ZIP code, or are they spread out, offering more equitable access to residents in different parts of Six Mile? This geographic analysis influences the "Hypertension Score" significantly. A concentrated physician base, while potentially efficient, could disadvantage individuals living further from those centers.
The characteristics of primary care practices themselves contribute significantly to the "Hypertension Score." We must examine factors like appointment scheduling, wait times, and the availability of extended hours. Practices that offer same-day appointments or have evening and weekend availability demonstrably improve patient access, particularly for those with busy schedules or limited transportation options. Such practices would naturally receive a higher score.
Telemedicine adoption is another key element. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telehealth, and its continued integration into primary care is vital. Practices offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals significantly enhance accessibility and convenience. These features are particularly beneficial for patients managing chronic conditions like hypertension, allowing for more frequent check-ins and proactive intervention. Practices embracing telehealth would be favorably weighted in the "Hypertension Score."
The integration of mental health resources into primary care is increasingly recognized as crucial for holistic patient care. Hypertension is often intertwined with stress, anxiety, and depression, all of which can impact blood pressure control. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, are better equipped to address the complex needs of patients. This integration is a significant positive factor in the "Hypertension Score."
Standout practices within 29682, if any, would be identified based on the above criteria. These practices would serve as benchmarks for others in the area. Their success in providing accessible, patient-centered care, including telemedicine and mental health integration, would be analyzed to understand their strategies. This includes examining their patient communication protocols, their use of electronic health records (EHRs) for data tracking and analysis, and their commitment to patient education. These practices would, of course, receive higher scores.
Patient education is an often-overlooked, yet vital component of hypertension management. Practices that actively engage patients in their care through educational materials, lifestyle counseling, and self-monitoring tools are more likely to achieve positive outcomes. The "Hypertension Score" would reflect the extent to which practices prioritize patient education.
The availability of supporting resources beyond the primary care setting also plays a role. This includes access to pharmacies, specialists (cardiologists, nephrologists), and community health programs. Proximity to pharmacies offering medication adherence programs, for example, can significantly improve patient compliance. Similarly, the availability of specialists for complex cases ensures that patients receive the appropriate level of care. These factors would be assessed in relation to the primary care landscape.
The "Hypertension Score" would also consider the socioeconomic factors that can impact hypertension management. This includes income levels, insurance coverage rates, and access to healthy food options. Addressing these social determinants of health is crucial for achieving equitable outcomes. Practices that are actively involved in community outreach and provide resources for patients facing socioeconomic challenges would be viewed favorably.
The overall "Hypertension Score" for 29682 and Six Mile would be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted average of all the factors discussed. It would provide a snapshot of the current landscape, highlighting areas of strength and weakness. The score would be a dynamic measure, subject to change as practices evolve and resources are added or removed.
This analysis, while providing a framework, can be further enriched with data visualization. Mapping the distribution of physicians, pharmacies, and support services within the ZIP code would provide a visual representation of access and resource availability. This is where the power of geographical information systems (GIS) becomes apparent.
**Ready to visualize the landscape of primary care and hypertension resources in 29682? Explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of physician distribution, resource accessibility, and identify areas for improvement. Click here to learn more and start exploring!**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like