The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 29691, Walhalla, South Carolina is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 83.52 percent of the residents in 29691 has some form of health insurance. 47.12 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.71 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29691 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,988 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29691. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,263 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 836 health care providers accessible to residents in 29691, Walhalla, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29691, Walhalla, South Carolina
Hypertension Score | 4 |
---|---|
People Score | 12 |
Provider Score | 38 |
Hospital Score | 14 |
Travel Score | 33 |
29691 | Walhalla | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29691 and Primary Care Availability in Walhalla
This analysis evaluates the availability and quality of primary care services in Walhalla, South Carolina (ZIP code 29691), focusing on factors pertinent to hypertension management. The aim is to provide a "Hypertension Score" assessment, considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and access to mental health resources, all crucial elements in managing this prevalent condition.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a foundational metric. In Walhalla, the ratio of primary care physicians (PCPs) to the overall population is a critical indicator. A lower ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Publicly available data from sources like the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) must be consulted to ascertain the current physician-to-patient ratio. A high ratio would negatively impact the Hypertension Score.
Beyond sheer numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is also vital. Are the existing practices clustered in specific areas, potentially creating access disparities for residents in more rural or underserved parts of Walhalla? The geographic distribution of practices should be mapped to identify potential "healthcare deserts" where access to primary care is limited. This spatial analysis would influence the Hypertension Score, with uneven distribution negatively affecting the score.
The characteristics of the primary care practices themselves are key. The presence of board-certified internists and family medicine physicians is a positive indicator. The practices’ adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is also significant. EHRs facilitate better care coordination, medication management, and the tracking of patient data, all crucial for hypertension control. Practices with robust EHR systems will receive a higher score.
Several practices in Walhalla are worthy of specific scrutiny. We must identify those that demonstrate a commitment to hypertension management. This includes practices that actively screen patients for hypertension, provide comprehensive patient education on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), and offer readily available follow-up appointments. Practices with dedicated hypertension clinics or programs, or those actively participating in quality improvement initiatives related to hypertension management, will receive a significantly higher score.
Telemedicine adoption is a growing trend, particularly in rural areas. The availability of telehealth consultations for primary care services is a significant positive factor. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments or who live in geographically isolated areas. Practices offering telehealth options, including remote blood pressure monitoring and virtual follow-up appointments, will receive a higher score. The ease of use of the telemedicine platform, its integration with EHRs, and the availability of technical support for patients are also important considerations.
Mental health is inextricably linked to hypertension management. Chronic stress and anxiety can contribute to elevated blood pressure. The availability of mental health resources within or in close proximity to primary care practices is a crucial factor. Practices that offer on-site behavioral health services, or that have established referral networks with mental health professionals, will receive a higher score. This integration of mental and physical healthcare is critical for holistic patient care.
The affordability of primary care services is another key consideration. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, is vital. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, and that offer financial assistance programs for patients, will receive a higher score. Transparency in pricing and the availability of information about the cost of services are also important.
The quality of patient education materials and resources is also considered. Practices that provide patients with clear, concise, and culturally sensitive information about hypertension, its management, and lifestyle modifications are more likely to achieve positive patient outcomes. This includes written materials, online resources, and group education sessions. Practices with robust patient education programs will receive a higher score.
The overall patient experience is another factor. This includes the ease of scheduling appointments, the wait times in the waiting room, the friendliness and responsiveness of the staff, and the overall satisfaction of patients with their care. Patient satisfaction surveys and online reviews can provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Practices with positive patient feedback will receive a higher score.
The Hypertension Score is a composite measure reflecting all of these factors. It is not simply a numerical score but a nuanced assessment of the quality and accessibility of primary care services in Walhalla. The score will reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape, providing valuable information for both patients and healthcare providers.
The final Hypertension Score will be a dynamic measure, reflecting the ever-changing healthcare landscape. Regular updates, based on new data and evolving best practices, are essential. This analysis provides a snapshot in time, highlighting areas of strength and areas for improvement. The goal is to empower patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare and to encourage healthcare providers to continually strive to improve the quality of care they provide.
For a visual representation of the physician distribution, practice locations, and other relevant data, we encourage you to explore the power of spatial analysis. CartoChrome maps can provide interactive visualizations of the data discussed in this analysis, allowing you to explore the healthcare landscape of Walhalla in detail. CartoChrome maps can help you understand the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas with limited access to care, and make informed decisions about your health. Click here to explore CartoChrome maps and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like