The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 29714, Fort Lawn, South Carolina is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 82.87 percent of the residents in 29714 has some form of health insurance. 43.88 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29714 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,089 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29714. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 557 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,829 health care providers accessible to residents in 29714, Fort Lawn, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29714, Fort Lawn, South Carolina
Hypertension Score | 12 |
---|---|
People Score | 20 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 36 |
Travel Score | 51 |
29714 | Fort Lawn | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Fort Lawn, SC (ZIP Code 29714)
Analyzing the availability and quality of hypertension care in Fort Lawn, South Carolina (ZIP Code 29714) requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider not only the number of physicians but also their specialization, the resources available within their practices, and the broader community support for patients managing this chronic condition. This analysis will provide a "Hypertension Score" assessment, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in this specific geographic area.
Fort Lawn, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. Its rural setting can lead to limited access to specialists and a smaller pool of primary care physicians (PCPs) compared to more urban areas. This impacts the physician-to-patient ratio, a crucial factor in evaluating hypertension care. A higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access and potentially more individualized care. However, simply looking at this ratio is insufficient. We need to delve deeper into the specifics of each practice.
The availability of primary care is paramount. PCPs are the frontline in hypertension management, providing initial diagnoses, medication management, and ongoing monitoring. Assessing the number of PCPs actively practicing in 29714 is the first step. We must then examine their qualifications, board certifications, and areas of expertise. Do they have experience treating complex hypertension cases? Are they up-to-date on the latest guidelines and treatment protocols? Are they accepting new patients? These factors significantly influence the "Hypertension Score."
Standout practices deserve special attention. These are the clinics and individual physicians who demonstrate excellence in hypertension care. We would evaluate them based on several criteria. Do they have dedicated staff members focused on hypertension management, such as nurses or certified diabetes educators? Do they offer comprehensive patient education materials and resources? Do they have robust systems for tracking patient blood pressure readings and medication adherence? Do they actively participate in quality improvement initiatives to improve patient outcomes? Identifying these practices and highlighting their best practices can serve as a model for other providers in the area.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the "Hypertension Score." Telemedicine offers significant advantages in rural settings, allowing patients to access care remotely, reducing travel time and improving convenience. Practices that have embraced telemedicine for hypertension management, offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication refills, would receive higher scores. The availability of user-friendly telehealth platforms and the integration of these platforms into the practice's workflow are also important considerations.
Hypertension is often intertwined with mental health. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, assessing the availability of mental health resources is essential for a comprehensive "Hypertension Score." Are there mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, or licensed therapists, available in or near Fort Lawn? Do primary care practices have established referral pathways to these resources? Do they offer integrated mental health services within their clinics? The presence of these resources and the ease with which patients can access them are crucial for holistic hypertension management.
Specific data points will shape the "Hypertension Score." For example, the number of PCPs per 1,000 residents in 29714 will be a key metric. The percentage of PCPs utilizing telemedicine for hypertension management will be another. The availability of on-site or readily accessible mental health services within the primary care practices will be carefully evaluated. The presence of certified diabetes educators and the availability of patient education materials will also be factored in. Each element will be weighted based on its impact on patient outcomes and access to care.
Furthermore, the "Hypertension Score" will consider the local community's support for hypertension management. Are there community health programs or initiatives focused on hypertension prevention and control? Are there support groups or educational programs available to patients? The presence of these resources can significantly enhance the overall care landscape.
The analysis will also explore the cost of care. The affordability of medications, the availability of insurance coverage, and the cost of physician visits are all important factors in determining patient access to care. Practices that offer affordable care options or assist patients in navigating insurance coverage will receive higher scores.
The final "Hypertension Score" will be a composite metric, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in 29714. It will provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to understand the current state of hypertension care and identify areas for improvement. This score will be a dynamic measure, updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
This detailed analysis, however, requires a robust mapping and data visualization platform. To truly understand the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and the geographic accessibility of care, we recommend exploring the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can visually represent the "Hypertension Score" data, showing the locations of physicians, the availability of resources, and the areas where access to care may be limited. This visual representation is invaluable for identifying gaps in care and developing targeted interventions to improve hypertension management in Fort Lawn and surrounding areas.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like