The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 24924, Buckeye, West Virginia is 58 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 24924 has some form of health insurance. 83.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.44 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 24924 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 17 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 24924. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 164 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 85 health care providers accessible to residents in 24924, Buckeye, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 24924, Buckeye, West Virginia
Hypertension Score | 80 |
---|---|
People Score | 91 |
Provider Score | 58 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 48 |
24924 | Buckeye | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of hypertension management within ZIP Code 24924, encompassing the community of Buckeye, requires a multifaceted approach. We will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, assess physician-to-patient ratios, and explore the adoption of innovative healthcare delivery methods like telemedicine. Furthermore, we will examine the integration of mental health resources, a critical component of comprehensive hypertension care. The ultimate goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the landscape and identify areas for improvement.
The foundation of effective hypertension control rests on accessible primary care. In Buckeye, the availability of primary care physicians directly impacts a patient's ability to receive timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management. Assessing the density of primary care providers within the ZIP Code is crucial. Are there enough physicians to meet the needs of the population? Are there any underserved pockets within the community? The answers to these questions will inform the overall ‘Hypertension Score’.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a key metric. A high ratio, indicating a large patient load per physician, can potentially strain resources and limit the amount of time a doctor can dedicate to each patient. This can translate to less thorough examinations, shorter consultations, and less individualized care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests a greater capacity for physicians to provide more attentive and comprehensive care, potentially leading to better hypertension outcomes. Data from local healthcare providers, regional health authorities, and potentially state medical boards would be needed to accurately determine this ratio.
Identifying standout practices within the area is vital. These practices may exhibit exemplary hypertension management protocols, patient education programs, or innovative approaches to care delivery. Analyzing the practices’ patient outcomes, adherence to clinical guidelines, and patient satisfaction scores would help identify these top performers. Understanding their strategies could offer valuable insights and best practices for other providers in the region.
Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool in hypertension management, particularly in rural areas. It can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to connect with their physicians remotely for consultations, medication management, and monitoring. Examining the adoption rate of telemedicine among primary care providers in Buckeye is crucial. Are physicians utilizing telehealth platforms to follow up with patients? Are they employing remote blood pressure monitoring devices? The presence and effectiveness of these technologies will significantly influence the ‘Hypertension Score’.
The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources into hypertension care is essential. Does Buckeye have readily available mental health professionals? Are there collaborative care models in place, where primary care physicians and mental health providers work together to manage patients' overall well-being? The availability and integration of these resources will play a crucial role in the overall assessment.
Furthermore, the availability of specialized resources, such as certified diabetes educators and registered dietitians, should be considered. These professionals can provide patients with education and support related to lifestyle modifications, such as diet and exercise, which are critical components of hypertension management. Their presence and accessibility would positively influence the ‘Hypertension Score’.
The analysis should also include an assessment of patient education initiatives. Are there programs in place to educate patients about hypertension, its risk factors, and the importance of medication adherence and lifestyle changes? The effectiveness of these programs, measured by patient knowledge and behavior changes, will be a key indicator of the quality of care.
The ‘Hypertension Score’ itself would be a composite measure, reflecting the various factors discussed. It would be based on a weighted system, where each factor is assigned a specific weight based on its importance. The score could be represented on a scale, allowing for a clear and concise understanding of the overall quality of hypertension care in Buckeye.
Data collection would be a critical step. This would involve gathering information from various sources, including local healthcare providers, hospitals, health insurance companies, and public health agencies. The accuracy and completeness of the data would directly impact the reliability of the ‘Hypertension Score’.
The analysis should also consider the demographic characteristics of the population in Buckeye. Factors such as age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status can influence hypertension prevalence and outcomes. Understanding these demographic factors will help to identify disparities in care and tailor interventions accordingly.
The analysis should also assess the availability of resources for underserved populations. Are there programs in place to address health disparities and ensure that all residents have access to quality hypertension care, regardless of their background or socioeconomic status? The presence and effectiveness of these programs would positively impact the ‘Hypertension Score’.
The assessment of medication adherence is another critical factor. Are physicians monitoring patients' adherence to their prescribed medications? Are there programs in place to help patients overcome barriers to adherence, such as cost or side effects? The level of medication adherence is a strong predictor of hypertension control.
The use of electronic health records (EHRs) can also be assessed. EHRs can facilitate data sharing, improve care coordination, and support clinical decision-making. The extent to which primary care providers in Buckeye utilize EHRs and the effectiveness of their EHR systems will be factored into the overall ‘Hypertension Score’.
The analysis should also consider the presence of community-based resources, such as support groups and wellness programs. These resources can provide patients with additional support and education, helping them to manage their hypertension effectively.
The assessment should also look at the presence of quality improvement initiatives. Are there programs in place to continuously monitor and improve the quality of hypertension care? The effectiveness of these initiatives will be reflected in the ‘Hypertension Score’.
Finally, the ‘Hypertension Score’ should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This would ensure that the score remains relevant and provides an accurate assessment of the quality of hypertension care in Buckeye.
For a comprehensive visual representation of the data and a deeper dive into the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform can transform complex data into actionable insights, allowing you to identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement in hypertension management within ZIP Code 24924 and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like