The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 25425, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.28 percent of the residents in 25425 has some form of health insurance. 33.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.57 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25425 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,013 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 26 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25425. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,220 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,341 health care providers accessible to residents in 25425, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25425, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia
Hypertension Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 67 |
Provider Score | 49 |
Hospital Score | 24 |
Travel Score | 60 |
25425 | Harpers Ferry | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Harpers Ferry (25425) Primary Care Landscape
Analyzing the primary care landscape within ZIP code 25425, encompassing Harpers Ferry, necessitates a nuanced understanding of factors impacting hypertension management. A 'Hypertension Score' would ideally assess the availability, quality, and accessibility of resources designed to combat this prevalent condition. This analysis will delve into key areas, providing insights into the current situation and potential areas for improvement.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator. Within Harpers Ferry, the ratio likely reflects the broader trends of rural healthcare access. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced opportunities for preventative care, and potentially, less effective management of chronic conditions like hypertension. Accurate data on this ratio requires accessing publicly available databases or specialized healthcare analytics platforms. The availability of primary care physicians is a critical starting point.
Standout practices, if any, within the ZIP code would be identified by their commitment to comprehensive hypertension care. This includes a multi-faceted approach incorporating medication management, lifestyle counseling, and regular monitoring. Practices excelling in this area often employ registered dietitians, certified diabetes educators, and behavioral health specialists. They might also have dedicated nurses or medical assistants trained in hypertension management, providing support and education to patients. These practices would likely have a robust system for patient follow-up, ensuring adherence to treatment plans and proactively addressing any concerns.
Telemedicine adoption is another significant factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online educational resources can significantly improve hypertension management, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in geographically isolated areas. Practices embracing telemedicine often see improved patient engagement and adherence to treatment plans. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration requires investigating individual practice websites, patient reviews, and publicly available information on telehealth service offerings.
Mental health resources are inextricably linked to hypertension management. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Practices that recognize this connection and provide access to mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. Identifying the availability of these resources involves researching practice websites, contacting the practices directly, and examining community health directories.
The specific practices within 25425 require individual evaluation. A comprehensive assessment would include reviewing patient reviews, examining the scope of services offered, and analyzing the staff's qualifications. Practices demonstrating a proactive approach to hypertension management, such as implementing patient education programs, offering convenient appointment scheduling, and utilizing electronic health records for data tracking, would likely receive higher scores.
The availability of specialized clinics or programs focused on hypertension management within or near 25425 is another critical consideration. These clinics often provide comprehensive care, including advanced diagnostic testing, medication adjustments, and intensive lifestyle interventions. The presence of such resources significantly enhances the overall quality of hypertension care available to residents.
The accessibility of pharmacies and the availability of affordable medications are also essential components. Patients need easy access to their prescribed medications to maintain optimal blood pressure control. Evaluating the proximity of pharmacies, the range of medications stocked, and the availability of generic options provides a clearer picture of medication accessibility.
Furthermore, understanding the local community health initiatives related to hypertension is essential. Public health programs, community screenings, and educational campaigns can play a significant role in raising awareness about hypertension and promoting early detection and treatment. Investigating the involvement of local healthcare providers in these initiatives provides valuable insights into their commitment to community health.
The 'Hypertension Score' would ultimately reflect a synthesis of these factors. It would not be a simple numerical value but a multi-faceted assessment of the primary care landscape. The score would highlight areas of strength and weakness, providing valuable information for patients seeking care and for healthcare providers striving to improve their services.
The analysis of 25425 should also consider the demographic characteristics of the population. Understanding the age distribution, socioeconomic status, and racial/ethnic composition of the community can help identify specific needs and tailor interventions accordingly. For example, a higher proportion of older adults might necessitate a greater emphasis on geriatric care and medication management.
The integration of technology is also crucial. Practices utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, send automated reminders, and facilitate communication can improve efficiency and patient outcomes. The use of patient portals, allowing patients to access their medical information and communicate with their providers, can also enhance engagement and adherence.
Finally, the assessment should consider the overall healthcare infrastructure in the surrounding region. The availability of specialists, hospitals, and emergency services can impact the quality of care available to patients with hypertension. Access to these resources is essential for managing complications and providing comprehensive care.
To gain a more visual and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Harpers Ferry and the surrounding areas, explore the data using CartoChrome maps. This tool can provide a spatial representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and community resources, offering a powerful perspective on hypertension care availability.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like