Hypertension Score

26178, Smithville, West Virginia Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 26178, Smithville, West Virginia

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26178, Smithville, West Virginia is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 26178 has some form of health insurance. 68.72 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.86 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26178 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 18 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26178. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 64 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 64 health care providers accessible to residents in 26178, Smithville, West Virginia.

Health Scores in 26178, Smithville, West Virginia

Hypertension Score 45
People Score 95
Provider Score 12
Hospital Score 54
Travel Score 24

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

26178 Smithville West Virginia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 26178, Smithville, West Virginia

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 26178 and Primary Care Availability in Smithville**

The assessment of hypertension management within ZIP code 26178, encompassing the town of Smithville, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will evaluate the availability of primary care physicians, their capacity to manage hypertension, and the integration of supportive resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the local healthcare landscape, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement in hypertension care.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical starting point. Determining the exact ratio in Smithville requires accessing up-to-date data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or similar sources. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can strain the healthcare system, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to preventative care, including hypertension screenings and management. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility. The analysis must account for specialists as well, since they can be a resource for complex hypertension cases.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of physicians within the ZIP code is important. Are primary care physicians concentrated in one area, or are they spread throughout Smithville, offering more equitable access to care? The geographical distribution impacts patients' ability to receive care. Rural areas often face challenges in physician recruitment and retention, which could affect the availability of primary care in Smithville.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into the quality of care. This involves assessing factors such as patient satisfaction scores, adherence to clinical guidelines for hypertension management (e.g., guidelines from the American Heart Association or the American College of Cardiology), and the use of evidence-based practices. Practices that actively monitor patients' blood pressure, provide patient education on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), and proactively manage medication regimens are likely to achieve better outcomes.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. The use of telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that embrace telemedicine can offer more frequent check-ins, medication adjustments, and educational resources, all of which contribute to better hypertension control. The analysis must assess the availability of telemedicine services within the ZIP code, including the types of services offered and the technology infrastructure supporting them.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of hypertension management, but their impact is significant. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can elevate blood pressure and interfere with treatment adherence. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house providers or referrals to external resources, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This analysis should investigate the availability of mental health professionals, support groups, and educational programs within the community.

The availability of ancillary services, such as pharmacies, diagnostic laboratories, and specialized clinics, also plays a role. Convenient access to these services can streamline the patient experience and improve adherence to treatment plans. For example, patients who can easily fill their prescriptions at a local pharmacy are more likely to take their medications as prescribed.

The analysis should consider the socioeconomic factors that influence hypertension management. Poverty, lack of health insurance, and limited access to healthy food options can all contribute to poor health outcomes. Practices that are aware of these challenges and offer culturally sensitive care, financial assistance programs, or referrals to social services are better positioned to serve their patients effectively.

Evaluating the effectiveness of hypertension management requires examining data on blood pressure control rates. This involves assessing the percentage of patients within the ZIP code who have their blood pressure under control, according to established clinical guidelines. This data can be obtained from electronic health records, health insurance claims data, or population health surveys. The analysis should benchmark the local control rates against regional or national averages to identify areas for improvement.

The analysis must also consider the role of community health initiatives. Public health programs, such as those focused on promoting healthy lifestyles, providing free blood pressure screenings, and educating the public about hypertension, can contribute to improved health outcomes. The analysis should identify any such initiatives operating within Smithville and assess their impact on the community.

Furthermore, the analysis needs to consider the quality of patient education materials and resources. Are patients provided with clear, concise, and culturally appropriate information about hypertension, its management, and the importance of lifestyle modifications? Practices that prioritize patient education are more likely to empower patients to take an active role in their own care.

The analysis must also look at the use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs can improve the efficiency of care delivery, facilitate data sharing among providers, and enable the tracking of patient outcomes. Practices that have implemented robust EHR systems are better equipped to manage hypertension effectively. The analysis should assess the level of EHR adoption within the ZIP code and the extent to which EHRs are used to support hypertension management.

The overall assessment should incorporate a qualitative component. This involves gathering information from patients, physicians, and other stakeholders through surveys, interviews, or focus groups. This qualitative data can provide valuable insights into the patient experience, the challenges faced by healthcare providers, and the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.

In conclusion, a thorough analysis of hypertension management in ZIP code 26178 requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician availability, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, socioeconomic factors, and community health initiatives. This analysis must be data-driven, evidence-based, and patient-centered. It should identify areas of strength and weakness, and provide recommendations for improving hypertension care within the community.

To visualize the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and identify potential areas for improvement, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a dynamic and interactive platform for analyzing geographic data, visualizing healthcare access, and identifying areas where resources are most needed.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 26178, Smithville, West Virginia

You may also like

26137, Big Springs, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 4.73 Miles

Total Population:

26148, Macfarlan, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 7.21 Miles

Total Population:

26138, Brohard, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 7.26 Miles

Total Population:

26136, Big Bend, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 7.70 Miles

Total Population:

26152, Munday, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 10.05 Miles

Total Population:

26147, Grantsville, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 10.06 Miles

Total Population:

26161, Petroleum, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 12.95 Miles

Total Population:

26141, Creston, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 14.55 Miles

Total Population:

26151, Mount Zion, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26178: 14.77 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 26178, Smithville, West Virginia