The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26421, Pullman, West Virginia is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 77.42 percent of the residents in 26421 has some form of health insurance. 59.68 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 22.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26421 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 36 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26421. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 41 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 74 health care providers accessible to residents in 26421, Pullman, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26421, Pullman, West Virginia
Hypertension Score | 14 |
---|---|
People Score | 48 |
Provider Score | 10 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 15 |
26421 | Pullman | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Pullman, WV (ZIP Code 26421)
Analyzing hypertension management within Pullman, West Virginia (ZIP Code 26421) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis, focusing on primary care availability and the quality of hypertension care, aims to provide a comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' assessment. The score will be an implicit one, derived from the discussion of key factors impacting patient outcomes.
The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. Pullman, a relatively small community, likely faces challenges common to rural areas: physician shortages and limited specialist availability. The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. National averages provide a benchmark, but the specific ratio within 26421 needs investigation. Publicly available data from the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (WVDHHR) or the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) can offer insights into the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) serving the population. A low ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, suggests potential barriers to timely appointments, regular check-ups, and consistent monitoring – all vital for hypertension control.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs is critical. Are physicians concentrated in a single clinic or hospital, or are they spread across various practices? This distribution affects patient access. Centralized care might be more efficient for resource allocation but could create travel burdens for patients in outlying areas. Conversely, a decentralized system may offer greater convenience but potentially lead to fragmentation of care, where patients see different providers and experience inconsistent treatment approaches.
Identifying standout practices is essential. These are clinics or individual physicians demonstrating superior hypertension management practices. This requires examining several factors. Firstly, the use of evidence-based guidelines is paramount. Do practices adhere to the latest recommendations from organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC)? This includes consistent blood pressure monitoring, lifestyle counseling (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), and appropriate medication prescribing based on individual patient needs.
Secondly, the use of technology plays a crucial role. Electronic health records (EHRs) facilitate data tracking, medication management, and communication between providers. Practices with robust EHR systems can generate patient reports, identify individuals needing intervention, and ensure timely follow-up. Furthermore, the availability of patient portals allows patients to access their records, communicate with their providers, and monitor their blood pressure readings remotely.
Thirdly, patient education and engagement are vital. Practices that actively educate patients about hypertension, its risks, and self-management strategies are more likely to achieve positive outcomes. This includes providing educational materials, offering group classes, and empowering patients to actively participate in their care.
Telemedicine adoption presents both opportunities and challenges in 26421. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas. For hypertension management, telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management. However, successful telemedicine implementation requires reliable internet access, patient comfort with technology, and adequate reimbursement policies. The extent of telemedicine adoption among PCPs in Pullman needs assessment. Practices embracing telemedicine may demonstrate a higher 'Hypertension Score' due to increased accessibility and patient convenience.
Mental health resources are inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Patients experiencing these conditions may struggle to adhere to treatment plans, adopt healthy lifestyle behaviors, and attend regular check-ups. The availability of mental health services within the primary care setting or through referrals is crucial. Integrated care models, where mental health professionals collaborate with PCPs, can lead to improved patient outcomes. The presence of mental health support, either directly within primary care practices or through readily accessible referral networks, contributes positively to the 'Hypertension Score'.
Furthermore, the availability of ancillary services, such as registered dietitians and certified diabetes educators, can significantly enhance hypertension management. These professionals can provide specialized counseling on diet, exercise, and lifestyle modifications, which are essential components of hypertension control. Practices that offer or readily refer patients to these services are likely to achieve better outcomes.
Finally, the overall community environment plays a role. Factors like access to healthy food options, safe places for physical activity, and community support programs can influence patient outcomes. The availability of resources like farmers' markets, walking trails, and support groups can contribute to a healthier lifestyle and improved blood pressure control.
In conclusion, assessing the 'Hypertension Score' for physicians in ZIP Code 26421 requires a holistic view, encompassing physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the broader community environment. By evaluating these factors, we can gain a clearer understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of hypertension management in Pullman and identify areas for improvement.
For a visual representation of physician locations, access to care, and community resources within ZIP Code 26421, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide valuable insights into the spatial distribution of healthcare services and related factors, enabling a more informed assessment of hypertension management within the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like