26422, Reynoldsville, West Virginia Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26422, Reynoldsville, West Virginia is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 79.35 percent of the residents in 26422 has some form of health insurance. 23.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.74 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26422 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 104 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26422. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 56 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 945 health care providers accessible to residents in 26422, Reynoldsville, West Virginia.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Reynoldsville (ZIP Code 26422)

Analyzing the landscape of hypertension management within Reynoldsville, West Virginia (ZIP Code 26422) requires a nuanced approach, considering not only the availability of primary care physicians but also the broader healthcare ecosystem that supports effective blood pressure control. This analysis aims to provide a "Hypertension Score" assessment, evaluating key factors impacting patient care, ultimately offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare infrastructure.

The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. While precise figures fluctuate, understanding the general availability of primary care providers is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potential delays in diagnosis and treatment. This scarcity can disproportionately affect individuals with chronic conditions like hypertension, requiring regular monitoring and medication adjustments. Publicly available data from sources like the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, alongside information from physician directories and insurance provider networks, is essential to establishing a baseline understanding of the current physician-to-patient ratio within the specified ZIP code.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality and accessibility of primary care practices significantly influence the Hypertension Score. This involves evaluating the practices' infrastructure, including the availability of on-site diagnostic tools (e.g., blood pressure monitors, EKG machines), electronic health record (EHR) systems, and staff training in hypertension management protocols. Practices demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based guidelines, such as those from the American Heart Association or the American College of Cardiology, would score higher. Furthermore, the presence of certified diabetes educators or registered dietitians within the practice can significantly improve patient outcomes by providing specialized education and support.

Standout practices within the community often exhibit a proactive approach to hypertension management. This includes implementing patient education programs, offering medication management services, and actively tracking patient outcomes. These practices may utilize patient portals to facilitate communication and medication refills, enhancing patient engagement and adherence to treatment plans. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and regularly review patient data to identify areas for improvement would also receive a higher score. The adoption of a team-based approach, involving physicians, nurses, medical assistants, and other healthcare professionals, allows for comprehensive and coordinated care.

Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly impact the Hypertension Score, particularly in rural areas like Reynoldsville. Telemedicine allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving access to care for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Practices that offer telehealth consultations for blood pressure monitoring, medication management, and follow-up appointments would be viewed favorably. However, the successful implementation of telemedicine requires reliable internet access for both patients and providers, which can be a limiting factor in some rural communities.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of hypertension management. Chronic stress and anxiety can contribute to elevated blood pressure, and addressing these issues is essential for holistic care. The availability of mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the community or readily accessible through referral networks is crucial. Practices that screen patients for mental health conditions and provide referrals to appropriate resources would contribute positively to the Hypertension Score. Integration of mental health services into primary care practices, either through co-location or collaborative care models, is particularly beneficial.

The availability of resources for medication affordability is another factor. High medication costs can be a significant barrier to adherence to treatment plans. Practices that assist patients in accessing affordable medications, whether through patient assistance programs, generic drug options, or pharmacy partnerships, would be rated higher. The presence of a pharmacy within the community that offers competitive pricing and convenient services also contributes to the overall score.

The overall Hypertension Score is a composite measure reflecting the interplay of these factors. A high score indicates a healthcare environment that is well-equipped to manage hypertension effectively, with a sufficient number of accessible primary care providers, proactive practices, telemedicine options, integrated mental health resources, and support for medication affordability. Conversely, a low score suggests potential challenges in accessing and receiving quality hypertension care, highlighting the need for improvements in various areas.

The assessment of Reynoldsville's healthcare landscape is ongoing. The dynamic nature of the healthcare system requires continuous monitoring and evaluation. This analysis offers a snapshot, and its value lies in its ability to inform strategies to improve the quality of care for individuals managing hypertension within the community. The goal is to foster a healthier community by ensuring that all residents have access to the resources and support they need to effectively manage their blood pressure and live fulfilling lives.

For a more detailed and visually rich understanding of the healthcare landscape in Reynoldsville and surrounding areas, including the geographic distribution of healthcare providers, patient demographics, and access to resources, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. Their platform offers a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing healthcare data, providing valuable insights for patients, providers, and policymakers.