The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26437, Smithfield, West Virginia is 44 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.34 percent of the residents in 26437 has some form of health insurance. 25.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 85.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26437 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 139 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26437. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 65 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 334 health care providers accessible to residents in 26437, Smithfield, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26437, Smithfield, West Virginia
Hypertension Score | 42 |
---|---|
People Score | 45 |
Provider Score | 44 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 34 |
26437 | Smithfield | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on hypertension management capabilities within ZIP Code 26437, Smithfield, aiming to provide a comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' assessment. This score considers several factors, including physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, all crucial for effective hypertension control. The ultimate goal is to understand the landscape of care available and identify areas for potential improvement.
Physician-to-patient ratios are fundamental to assessing healthcare access. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially compromised care. Within ZIP Code 26437, we need to analyze the number of primary care physicians actively practicing, accounting for factors like board certifications, years of experience, and patient load. Data from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards are essential to establish an accurate ratio, which then serves as a baseline for comparison against national and regional averages. Smithfield’s population demographics, including age distribution and prevalence of chronic conditions, must also be considered to contextualize the physician-to-patient ratio's impact.
Standout practices demonstrate excellence in hypertension management. Identifying these practices requires an evaluation of several metrics. The percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure, as reported through quality reporting programs (e.g., Meaningful Use, MIPS), is a key indicator. Practices with higher control rates are likely employing effective strategies. Reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, available through sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) or practice-specific platforms, can also provide valuable insights into patient experience. Furthermore, examining the adoption of evidence-based guidelines, such as those from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC), reveals a commitment to best practices. Practices that actively engage in patient education, provide personalized care plans, and offer robust follow-up systems are more likely to achieve superior outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly for managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Telemedicine offers advantages like remote monitoring of blood pressure, medication adherence checks, and virtual consultations. Assessing telemedicine capabilities involves examining the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote patient monitoring devices, and the integration of telemedicine platforms into the practice's workflow. Practices that actively utilize telemedicine can potentially improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The level of patient engagement with telemedicine services, measured by factors like appointment attendance rates and patient satisfaction, is also a crucial consideration.
Mental health resources are inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can significantly elevate blood pressure, making it crucial to address the psychological well-being of patients. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling, therapy, and psychiatric consultations, within the primary care setting or through referral networks, is a key factor. Practices that screen for mental health conditions and offer integrated care, including access to behavioral health specialists, are better positioned to provide comprehensive hypertension management. The degree of collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals is also critical.
The 'Hypertension Score' for doctors in ZIP Code 26437 will be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted contributions of the factors discussed above. The weighting of each factor will depend on its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension control. For instance, physician-to-patient ratio and the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure might carry a higher weight than telemedicine adoption. The score will be calculated using publicly available data, practice websites, and potentially, direct communication with healthcare providers. The final score will be presented on a scale, allowing for easy comparison between practices and a clear understanding of the overall quality of hypertension care within Smithfield.
The analysis process will involve several steps. First, data collection from various sources, including government databases, practice websites, and publicly available quality metrics. Second, data cleaning and standardization to ensure accuracy and consistency. Third, the calculation of the 'Hypertension Score' based on the pre-defined weighting criteria. Fourth, a detailed report summarizing the findings, including individual practice scores, overall trends, and recommendations for improvement. Finally, the report will be disseminated to stakeholders, including healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers, to promote awareness and facilitate improvements in hypertension management.
The 'Hypertension Score' is not just a static assessment; it is a dynamic tool. Regular updates, incorporating new data and evolving best practices, will be necessary to maintain its relevance and accuracy. The analysis should also be expanded to include patient-level data, if available, to gain a more nuanced understanding of individual patient experiences and outcomes. Moreover, the analysis should consider the social determinants of health, such as socioeconomic status and access to healthy food, which can significantly impact hypertension control.
The 'Hypertension Score' analysis will provide valuable insights into the state of hypertension management in Smithfield. By identifying strengths and weaknesses, the analysis can inform strategies to improve care, enhance patient outcomes, and reduce the burden of hypertension within the community. The findings can also be used to advocate for policy changes that support improved access to care, promote the adoption of evidence-based practices, and foster collaboration among healthcare providers.
Ready to visualize the 'Hypertension Score' data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Smithfield? Explore the power of geospatial analysis with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer interactive visualizations that allow you to explore the data geographically, identify areas of high and low performance, and uncover hidden patterns. **Click here to learn more about CartoChrome maps and visualize the future of healthcare.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like