The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26568, Enterprise, West Virginia is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.60 percent of the residents in 26568 has some form of health insurance. 40.38 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 84.91 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26568 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 184 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26568. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 139 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 853 health care providers accessible to residents in 26568, Enterprise, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26568, Enterprise, West Virginia
Hypertension Score | 89 |
---|---|
People Score | 87 |
Provider Score | 63 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 52 |
26568 | Enterprise | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: ZIP Code 26568 and Enterprise Primary Care
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care services within ZIP code 26568, focusing on factors pertinent to hypertension management. We'll explore physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine the integration of mental health resources, all crucial components in effectively addressing hypertension. The scope also includes a consideration of the primary care landscape in Enterprise, a broader context for understanding resource allocation.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental metric. In ZIP code 26568, a rural area, the ratio likely presents a challenge. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) compared to the population size dictates access. A low ratio suggests a shortage, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments, reduced preventative care opportunities, and a greater burden on existing practitioners. This impacts hypertension management because regular check-ups and medication adjustments are essential for control. Conversely, a higher ratio, while desirable, does not automatically guarantee quality of care.
Enterprise, as a larger entity with potentially more resources, might offer a more favorable physician-to-patient ratio. However, geographic distribution within Enterprise is critical. Even with an adequate overall ratio, pockets of underserved populations could exist. Transportation barriers, especially for elderly or disabled individuals, can exacerbate these disparities. The analysis must consider these nuances to provide a complete picture.
Identifying standout practices requires a multifaceted approach. We need to evaluate practices based on several criteria. First, the accessibility of appointments: how quickly can patients schedule an initial consultation and follow-up visits? Second, the comprehensiveness of services: do they offer in-house blood pressure monitoring, medication management, and patient education programs specifically targeting hypertension? Third, patient satisfaction: what are patient reviews like, and how do they rate the practice's communication, empathy, and overall care?
Furthermore, the implementation of evidence-based guidelines is paramount. Do the practices adhere to the latest recommendations from organizations like the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology? Are they proactively screening patients for hypertension risk factors, such as family history, obesity, and lifestyle choices? The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) also plays a crucial role. EHRs enable efficient data management, allowing providers to track patient progress, identify trends, and tailor treatment plans.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor, especially in rural areas like ZIP code 26568. Telemedicine offers the potential to bridge geographical gaps and improve access to care. Practices that embrace telemedicine can provide virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management support. This can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those who live far from the clinic. The analysis should assess the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of use for patients, and the integration of telemedicine into the overall care workflow.
The integration of mental health resources is often overlooked in hypertension management, but it is critically important. Chronic stress and mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, can significantly impact blood pressure. Practices that offer integrated behavioral health services, either in-house or through referrals, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. The analysis should investigate the availability of mental health professionals, the presence of stress-reduction programs, and the coordination between primary care providers and mental health specialists.
In Enterprise, the availability of mental health resources might be more diverse. However, the challenge often lies in coordination and accessibility. Are mental health services geographically accessible to patients seeking primary care? Are there established referral pathways between primary care practices and mental health providers? Addressing these questions is vital for creating a truly patient-centered approach to hypertension management.
The quality of care is not solely determined by the availability of resources; it is also influenced by the commitment of healthcare providers to patient education and empowerment. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, providing them with the knowledge and tools to manage their condition, are more likely to achieve positive outcomes. This includes educating patients about lifestyle modifications, such as diet and exercise, and helping them understand the importance of medication adherence.
The analysis should also examine the presence of community resources that support hypertension management. This includes access to healthy food options, exercise facilities, and support groups. Collaboration between primary care practices and community organizations can create a comprehensive network of support for patients.
In conclusion, the hypertension score analysis for ZIP code 26568 and the broader primary care landscape in Enterprise requires a comprehensive assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This analysis should identify areas of strength and weakness, highlighting best practices and opportunities for improvement. A thorough understanding of these factors is essential for improving hypertension management and promoting the overall health and well-being of the community.
To visualize the data and gain deeper insights into the geographic distribution of resources and patient outcomes, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that allow you to analyze spatial data, identify patterns, and make informed decisions about healthcare resource allocation and patient care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like