The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26753, Ridgeley, West Virginia is 14 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.04 percent of the residents in 26753 has some form of health insurance. 44.50 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26753 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,208 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26753. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,362 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 450 health care providers accessible to residents in 26753, Ridgeley, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26753, Ridgeley, West Virginia
Hypertension Score | 14 |
---|---|
People Score | 53 |
Provider Score | 14 |
Hospital Score | 28 |
Travel Score | 37 |
26753 | Ridgeley | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Ridgeley, WV (ZIP Code 26753)
The assessment of hypertension management capabilities within Ridgeley, West Virginia (ZIP Code 26753), necessitates a multi-faceted analysis. This includes evaluating the availability and quality of primary care physicians, their approach to hypertension diagnosis and treatment, and the integration of supportive services like mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a "Hypertension Score" reflecting the community's capacity to effectively manage this prevalent health condition. This analysis will delve into various factors, aiming to paint a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape in Ridgeley.
One crucial aspect is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to appointment delays, reduced time per patient, and potentially compromised care. Researching the exact physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP Code 26753 is paramount. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) can offer insights into primary care physician density. This data should be compared to state and national averages to determine if Ridgeley faces a shortage or has adequate access to primary care. A low ratio would negatively impact the Hypertension Score, while a high ratio would positively influence it.
The quality of care provided by primary care physicians is equally important. This includes their adherence to established guidelines for hypertension diagnosis and treatment, such as those set forth by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Factors to consider include the frequency of blood pressure screenings, the use of evidence-based medications, and the implementation of lifestyle modification recommendations. Examining patient satisfaction surveys and physician reviews can provide valuable information about the patient experience and the perceived quality of care. Practices that consistently demonstrate a commitment to best practices would contribute positively to the overall score.
Identifying standout practices within the area is essential. These practices often serve as models for others. They might demonstrate exceptional patient outcomes, innovative approaches to care delivery, or a strong focus on patient education and support. Key indicators of a standout practice could include high rates of blood pressure control among hypertensive patients, proactive patient outreach programs, and robust patient education initiatives. Investigating the operational structure of these practices is also important. Are they patient-centered medical homes? Do they utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively? The presence of these features would contribute to a higher score.
The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor in assessing the quality of hypertension management. Telemedicine offers several benefits, including increased access to care, especially for patients in rural areas, and improved convenience. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals can enhance patient engagement and facilitate proactive management of hypertension. The availability of telemedicine services can significantly improve the Hypertension Score, particularly in a geographically isolated area like Ridgeley.
Beyond medical treatment, the integration of mental health resources is vital. Hypertension is often linked to stress, anxiety, and depression. Therefore, access to mental health services, such as counseling and therapy, can play a significant role in managing the condition. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals in the area, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, is essential. The presence of integrated behavioral health services within primary care practices would be particularly beneficial, streamlining access to mental health support for hypertensive patients. The availability and accessibility of mental health services would positively influence the Hypertension Score.
Patient education and support programs also contribute to effective hypertension management. These programs can empower patients to take an active role in their care. They might include educational materials on healthy eating, exercise, and stress management. Support groups can provide a sense of community and shared experience. Assessing the availability and quality of these programs is an important element of the analysis. Practices that prioritize patient education and support would receive a higher score.
The use of data analytics and population health management tools can further enhance hypertension management. These tools can help identify patients at high risk, track patient outcomes, and tailor interventions to individual needs. Practices that utilize these tools effectively are likely to achieve better patient outcomes. Investigating the use of data analytics and population health management tools within Ridgeley’s primary care practices is an important element of the analysis.
The overall Hypertension Score would be a composite measure, reflecting the combined influence of all the factors discussed. Each factor would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. The final score would provide a concise summary of the community's capacity to manage hypertension effectively. The score would be a valuable tool for healthcare providers, policymakers, and residents, helping them to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and to identify areas for improvement.
The analysis should also take into account the specific demographics of the population served by the primary care practices in Ridgeley. Factors such as age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status can influence the prevalence and management of hypertension. Understanding the demographic profile of the patient population can help to tailor interventions and improve outcomes.
Finally, the analysis should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. New technologies, treatment guidelines, and policy changes can all impact the effectiveness of hypertension management. Regular updates will ensure that the Hypertension Score remains a relevant and accurate assessment of the community's capabilities.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Ridgeley, including the location of primary care practices, the distribution of healthcare resources, and the demographics of the population, consider exploring the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a spatial representation of the data, allowing you to identify areas of need and opportunities for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like