26833, Maysville, West Virginia Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26833, Maysville, West Virginia is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 84.33 percent of the residents in 26833 has some form of health insurance. 44.13 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.09 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26833 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 431 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26833. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 518 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 170 health care providers accessible to residents in 26833, Maysville, West Virginia.

The assessment of hypertension management within ZIP Code 26833, encompassing the town of Maysville, necessitates a multifaceted approach, considering factors beyond just the presence of physicians. This analysis will evaluate the landscape of primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and identify any standout practices. This information will then be synthesized into a hypothetical "Hypertension Score," providing a comparative understanding of the area's capacity to effectively manage this prevalent condition.

The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. Maysville, as a relatively small community, faces inherent challenges in this regard. A critical aspect of the evaluation is the physician-to-patient ratio. National averages provide a benchmark, but the specific ratio within 26833 is crucial. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care physicians relative to the population, can significantly hinder access to timely screenings, diagnoses, and ongoing management of hypertension. This scarcity often leads to longer wait times for appointments, making it harder for patients to receive the regular check-ups vital for controlling blood pressure.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of physicians matters. Are the available primary care doctors concentrated in a single location, or are they spread throughout the area? Geographic accessibility impacts patient outcomes. Patients in rural areas, or those with limited transportation options, may struggle to reach distant clinics, further exacerbating the challenges of hypertension management. Furthermore, the types of primary care providers available should be examined. The presence of family physicians, internal medicine specialists, and nurse practitioners all contribute to a comprehensive primary care network.

Telemedicine offers a potential solution to some of the accessibility challenges. Its adoption, however, varies significantly. Within 26833, the extent of telemedicine integration should be assessed. Are primary care practices offering virtual consultations for medication management, blood pressure monitoring, and patient education? Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility issues, those living in remote areas, or those seeking convenient follow-up appointments. The availability of remote blood pressure monitoring devices, linked to the physician's practice, would further enhance the effectiveness of telemedicine.

The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is undeniable, especially in the context of hypertension. Stress, anxiety, and depression can all contribute to elevated blood pressure and hinder treatment adherence. The availability of mental health resources within Maysville is therefore an important component of the "Hypertension Score." This includes access to psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Are these resources readily available, or are there significant wait times? Are mental health services integrated into primary care practices, allowing for a more holistic approach to patient care?

Identifying standout practices within 26833 provides valuable insights. These practices may demonstrate superior hypertension management strategies, innovative approaches to patient care, or exceptional patient outcomes. The evaluation should consider factors such as: the use of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment, the implementation of patient education programs, the utilization of electronic health records for effective data tracking, and the adoption of quality improvement initiatives. Furthermore, the patient experience is critical. Practices with positive patient satisfaction scores, demonstrating a commitment to patient communication and support, should be recognized.

The "Hypertension Score" itself would be a composite metric, weighing the various factors discussed above. A higher score would indicate a greater capacity to effectively manage hypertension, reflecting a robust primary care network, good physician-to-patient ratios, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. A lower score would suggest areas for improvement, highlighting potential gaps in care and opportunities for intervention.

The methodology for calculating the score would involve assigning weighted values to each component. For example, physician-to-patient ratios might be weighted heavily, reflecting their fundamental importance. The availability of telemedicine and mental health resources would also receive significant weight, acknowledging their impact on patient access and overall well-being. The identification of standout practices could contribute positively to the score, while the absence of certain key elements, such as patient education programs, could negatively impact the score.

The data sources for this analysis would include: publicly available information from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the West Virginia Board of Medicine, local health department data, and potentially, patient surveys and interviews with healthcare providers. The accuracy of the score would depend on the completeness and reliability of the data.

The final "Hypertension Score" would provide a valuable snapshot of the hypertension management landscape in 26833. It would serve as a benchmark for assessing progress over time and identifying areas where resources should be directed. It would also offer insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations seeking to improve the health of residents. The goal is to provide a clear, concise, and actionable assessment of the current situation.

This analysis highlights the complexity of evaluating healthcare access and quality. The "Hypertension Score" is a tool for understanding, not a definitive judgment. It is a starting point for a more in-depth investigation.

For a visual understanding of the distribution of primary care physicians, the geographic accessibility of healthcare facilities, and other relevant data points, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Their platform can provide a detailed, spatially-aware perspective on the healthcare landscape in 26833.