Hypertension Score

26851, Wardensville, West Virginia Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 26851, Wardensville, West Virginia

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 26851, Wardensville, West Virginia is 9 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.12 percent of the residents in 26851 has some form of health insurance. 39.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26851 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 150 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26851. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 489 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 42 health care providers accessible to residents in 26851, Wardensville, West Virginia.

Health Scores in 26851, Wardensville, West Virginia

Hypertension Score 19
People Score 27
Provider Score 9
Hospital Score 63
Travel Score 44

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

26851 Wardensville West Virginia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 26851, Wardensville, West Virginia

Analyzing hypertension management and primary care accessibility in Wardensville, West Virginia (ZIP code 26851) requires a nuanced approach. We must consider the unique challenges of a rural community, including physician shortages, limited access to specialized care, and the impact of socioeconomic factors on patient health outcomes. This analysis will attempt to provide a 'Hypertension Score' ranking, though a precise numerical score isn't feasible without access to proprietary data. Instead, we'll use a qualitative assessment based on available information, focusing on key indicators relevant to hypertension control.

The physician-to-patient ratio in Wardensville is a critical factor. Rural areas often face significant shortages of primary care physicians, leading to increased wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnoses and treatment. The availability of specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists, is likely limited, forcing patients to travel considerable distances for specialized care. This geographical barrier can significantly impact adherence to treatment plans, especially for individuals with chronic conditions like hypertension.

A key aspect of our assessment is the identification of standout practices. These practices, if any, likely demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive hypertension management. This includes proactive screening programs, patient education initiatives, and the implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols. They may also have integrated systems for tracking patient progress, monitoring medication adherence, and providing timely interventions. The presence of certified diabetes educators or registered dietitians within a practice would be a positive indicator, as these professionals play a vital role in lifestyle modifications crucial for hypertension control.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. Telemedicine offers a potential solution to the geographical challenges faced by rural communities. It enables remote consultations with physicians, medication management, and remote monitoring of blood pressure and other vital signs. The extent to which practices in Wardensville have embraced telemedicine is a significant factor in our assessment. Practices utilizing telehealth platforms for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and patient education would receive a higher score.

Mental health resources are also essential. Hypertension is often linked to stress and anxiety, and addressing these underlying mental health issues can significantly improve patient outcomes. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling and therapy, within the primary care setting or through referrals is an important consideration. Practices that integrate mental health support into their care model are likely to achieve better hypertension control rates.

The socioeconomic landscape of Wardensville plays a significant role. Factors such as income levels, access to healthy food options, and the prevalence of health insurance coverage can all impact a patient's ability to manage their hypertension effectively. Practices that are aware of these social determinants of health and actively work to address them, for example, by connecting patients with community resources or offering financial assistance programs, would receive a higher score.

The 'Hypertension Score' ranking, in this context, will consider these factors. A practice with a high score would likely: have a strong physician-to-patient ratio, demonstrate proactive screening and treatment protocols, actively utilize telemedicine, integrate mental health support, and be aware of and address the socioeconomic factors impacting patient health. A practice with a lower score may face challenges in these areas, such as physician shortages, limited access to specialized care, and a lack of resources for patient education and support.

Specific practices within Wardensville are difficult to evaluate without access to internal data. However, we can infer a general picture based on publicly available information and general knowledge of rural healthcare challenges. The presence of a well-established primary care clinic with a long-standing reputation for patient care would be a positive indicator. The size of the clinic, the number of physicians employed, and the range of services offered would all be relevant factors.

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is also important. EHRs facilitate data sharing, improve care coordination, and enable the tracking of patient outcomes. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively are better positioned to manage hypertension and other chronic conditions. The ability to generate reports on patient outcomes, such as blood pressure control rates, is a key indicator of effective EHR implementation.

The availability of community resources is another key consideration. The presence of local pharmacies, support groups, and community health programs can all contribute to improved patient outcomes. Practices that actively partner with these resources and refer patients to them would receive a higher score. The availability of transportation services for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments is also an important factor.

Considering the challenges of rural healthcare, the 'Hypertension Score' ranking for Wardensville would likely reflect a need for improvement. Addressing physician shortages, expanding telemedicine capabilities, and increasing access to mental health services are critical steps towards improving hypertension control in the community. Patient education and support programs are also essential, as is a focus on addressing the socioeconomic factors that impact patient health.

In conclusion, while a precise numerical 'Hypertension Score' is impossible to provide without access to proprietary data, the analysis highlights key areas for improvement in Wardensville. The success of hypertension management hinges on a multifaceted approach that includes physician availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health support, and a commitment to addressing the socioeconomic determinants of health.

To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Wardensville and to visualize the distribution of resources and access points, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, clinic locations, and other relevant data points, allowing for a more informed assessment of the healthcare environment.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 26851, Wardensville, West Virginia

You may also like

26823, Capon Springs, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 1.26 Miles

Total Population:

26865, Yellow Spring, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 2.96 Miles

Total Population:

26808, High View, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 6.92 Miles

Total Population:

26810, Lost City, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 17.73 Miles

Total Population:

26817, Bloomery, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 20.21 Miles

Total Population:

26845, Old Fields, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 23.70 Miles

Total Population:

26852, Purgitsville, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 24.03 Miles

Total Population:

26836, Moorefield, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 24.96 Miles

Total Population:

26812, Mathias, West Virginia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 26851: 26.74 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 26851, Wardensville, West Virginia