The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 35042, Centreville, Alabama is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.66 percent of the residents in 35042 has some form of health insurance. 40.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35042 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,107 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35042. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,225 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 126 health care providers accessible to residents in 35042, Centreville, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35042, Centreville, Alabama
Lung Cancer Score | 25 |
---|---|
People Score | 35 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 63 |
35042 | Centreville | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score assessment for primary care physicians in ZIP code 35042, Centreville, Alabama, considering factors crucial to patient care, including accessibility, resources, and innovation. The score isn't a single number, but a composite view of the healthcare landscape, offering insights into the strengths and areas needing improvement.
**Primary Care Landscape in Centreville: A Lung Cancer Score Analysis**
Centreville, a rural community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The availability of primary care, the first point of contact for individuals potentially at risk for lung cancer, is paramount. Early detection and intervention significantly improve patient outcomes. This analysis considers several key factors to evaluate the quality and accessibility of primary care in the area.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratio:**
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of access. A lower ratio, meaning more patients per doctor, can strain resources and potentially limit appointment availability and the time physicians can dedicate to each patient. Determining the exact ratio for Centreville requires data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and the Alabama Department of Public Health. A higher ratio, especially in a community with an aging population, would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score. Conversely, a lower ratio would positively influence the score, suggesting better access to care.
**Standout Practices and Their Impact:**
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several aspects. The presence of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specialized training in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment is a significant positive factor. Practices that offer comprehensive services, including smoking cessation programs, lung cancer screening (e.g., low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals), and access to specialists, would receive a higher score. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals can also improve care coordination and patient engagement, contributing to a better score.
**Telemedicine Adoption: A Critical Element:**
Telemedicine plays a vital role in bridging geographical barriers, particularly in rural areas like Centreville. Practices that have embraced telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions would receive a higher score. This is especially crucial for lung cancer patients, who often require frequent monitoring and follow-up care. The ability to access specialists remotely through telemedicine can also improve the Lung Cancer Score.
**Mental Health Resources: An Often-Overlooked Component:**
Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a significant impact on mental health. Anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges are common among patients. The availability of mental health resources, such as on-site counselors or partnerships with mental health providers, is a critical factor in the Lung Cancer Score. Practices that prioritize mental health support, offering counseling, support groups, or referrals to mental health specialists, would receive a higher score. This holistic approach to care is essential for patient well-being.
**Specific Considerations for ZIP Code 35042:**
The specific characteristics of ZIP code 35042, including its demographics, socioeconomic status, and access to transportation, must be considered. A community with a higher proportion of elderly residents or individuals with limited access to transportation might require more proactive outreach and flexible appointment scheduling. Practices that offer transportation assistance or home health visits would receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to addressing the unique needs of the community.
**Scoring Methodology and Weighting:**
The Lung Cancer Score isn't a simple calculation. It involves a weighted scoring system, where each factor is assigned a weight based on its importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and the availability of lung cancer screening might be weighted more heavily than the presence of a patient portal. Data from various sources, including physician directories, insurance provider networks, and patient reviews, would be compiled to create a comprehensive assessment.
**Areas for Improvement and Recommendations:**
Based on the analysis, areas for improvement might include increasing the physician-to-patient ratio, expanding telemedicine services, and enhancing mental health support. Recommendations could include recruiting more primary care physicians, promoting telemedicine adoption through financial incentives, and establishing partnerships with mental health providers. Investing in community health education programs, focusing on smoking cessation and lung cancer awareness, would also contribute to a better Lung Cancer Score.
**The Importance of Data-Driven Insights:**
Accurate data is the foundation of a reliable Lung Cancer Score. Regularly updating the score, based on changes in the healthcare landscape, is crucial. This continuous monitoring allows for identifying trends, tracking progress, and making informed decisions to improve healthcare delivery.
**Conclusion:**
The Lung Cancer Score analysis provides a valuable framework for evaluating the quality and accessibility of primary care in Centreville, Alabama. By considering factors such as physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, this analysis offers a comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape. The goal is to identify strengths, pinpoint areas needing improvement, and ultimately, enhance the care available to individuals at risk for lung cancer. This data-driven approach can lead to more effective resource allocation, improved patient outcomes, and a healthier community.
**Take the Next Step:**
Want to visualize the healthcare landscape in Centreville and beyond? Explore the power of data-driven mapping with CartoChrome. See the locations of healthcare providers, analyze population demographics, and identify areas with the greatest need. Visit CartoChrome maps today to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions for a healthier future.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like