The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 35446, Buhl, Alabama is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.85 percent of the residents in 35446 has some form of health insurance. 45.25 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35446 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 561 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35446. An estimate of 11 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 206 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,353 health care providers accessible to residents in 35446, Buhl, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35446, Buhl, Alabama
Lung Cancer Score | 61 |
---|---|
People Score | 58 |
Provider Score | 73 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 43 |
35446 | Buhl | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Buhl, Alabama (ZIP Code 35446)
Analyzing the landscape of healthcare in Buhl, Alabama (ZIP code 35446) requires a nuanced understanding of factors impacting lung cancer outcomes. This analysis, termed a “Lung Cancer Score,” evaluates primary care access, physician availability, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources within the community. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview, highlighting strengths and weaknesses to inform both residents and healthcare providers.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care lies in early detection and management. This, in turn, hinges on accessible primary care. Buhl, a small community, likely faces challenges in this regard. The first aspect to consider is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and reduced opportunities for preventative screenings, all of which negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Alabama Department of Public Health should be consulted to determine this ratio.
Furthermore, the geographic distribution of primary care physicians is critical. Are the available doctors centrally located, easily accessible by all residents, or are there pockets of the community underserved due to distance or transportation limitations? This aspect impacts the Lung Cancer Score significantly, as limited access can deter individuals from seeking care.
The availability of specialized services is another crucial factor. While primary care physicians are the first line of defense, access to pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons is essential for diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care for lung cancer patients. The Lung Cancer Score is heavily influenced by the proximity of these specialists. Do residents need to travel long distances to receive specialized care? Such travel can be burdensome, especially for patients undergoing treatment, and can negatively affect their overall well-being and treatment adherence.
Telemedicine adoption presents an opportunity to mitigate some of the challenges related to geographic limitations and specialist availability. The degree to which primary care practices in Buhl utilize telemedicine services is a key component of the Lung Cancer Score. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring, thereby increasing access to care and improving patient convenience. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, particularly for chronic disease management, will likely receive a higher score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but play a vital role in cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The Lung Cancer Score must account for the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the community or accessible to its residents. Practices that integrate mental health support into their care models, either through in-house services or referrals to external providers, will be viewed favorably.
Standout practices in Buhl, if any, should be identified. These practices might excel in specific areas, such as early detection programs, patient education, or comprehensive care coordination. For example, a practice that actively promotes lung cancer screening for eligible patients, offers smoking cessation programs, and coordinates care with specialists would be considered a high-performing practice and would positively influence the overall Lung Cancer Score. Conversely, practices with limited resources, long wait times, and a lack of preventative care would negatively affect the score.
The Lung Cancer Score also reflects the community's commitment to preventative care. Do local primary care physicians actively promote smoking cessation programs? Are there public health initiatives aimed at raising awareness about lung cancer risk factors and early detection? A community that prioritizes prevention and early intervention will receive a higher score.
The economic factors within Buhl also influence the Lung Cancer Score. The affordability of healthcare, including insurance coverage and out-of-pocket expenses, impacts access to care. Residents with limited financial resources may delay seeking medical attention, leading to later-stage diagnoses and poorer outcomes. The Lung Cancer Score must acknowledge the economic realities of the community and the potential impact on health outcomes.
Finally, the Lung Cancer Score is not a static measure. It should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect changes in healthcare availability, advancements in medical technology, and the evolving needs of the community. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are crucial for identifying areas for improvement and ensuring that residents of Buhl have access to the best possible lung cancer care.
In conclusion, the Lung Cancer Score for Buhl, Alabama, is a multifaceted assessment that considers physician-to-patient ratios, specialist availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the community's commitment to preventative care. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the healthcare landscape and identify areas for improvement.
For a more detailed and visually insightful understanding of healthcare access and distribution within Buhl and surrounding areas, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. Their platform offers powerful data visualization tools that can help you analyze physician locations, healthcare facilities, and other relevant factors, providing a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like