35584, Sipsey, Alabama Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 35584, Sipsey, Alabama is 35 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.37 percent of the residents in 35584 has some form of health insurance. 67.56 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 46.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35584 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 76 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35584. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 48 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 57 health care providers accessible to residents in 35584, Sipsey, Alabama.

Please be advised that creating a "Lung Cancer Score" for individual doctors and primary care availability based on the provided parameters is a complex task. It requires access to and analysis of vast, often proprietary, datasets. This response provides a conceptual framework and illustrative discussion, not a definitive scoring system. It is also important to note that the term "Lung Cancer Score" is not a standard medical metric and should not be interpreted as such. This analysis should not be used to make healthcare decisions.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 35584 and Primary Care Availability in Sipsey**

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 35584 and specifically addressing primary care availability in the town of Sipsey requires a multi-faceted approach. A hypothetical "Lung Cancer Score" would not be a single number but rather a composite evaluation based on various factors impacting lung cancer detection, treatment, and overall patient well-being. This analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.

The foundation of any assessment begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. In ZIP Code 35584 and the surrounding area, data from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or similar sources would be critical. This data reveals the number of primary care physicians, pulmonologists, oncologists, and radiologists relative to the population size. A low ratio of specialists, particularly pulmonologists and oncologists, would negatively impact the hypothetical "Lung Cancer Score." This is because timely access to specialists is crucial for early diagnosis and effective treatment of lung cancer. Furthermore, the availability of primary care physicians acts as the first line of defense, promoting preventative care, screening, and early detection.

Within the context of Sipsey, the primary care landscape becomes even more crucial. Rural areas often face physician shortages. Assessing the number of primary care physicians actively practicing in Sipsey, their proximity to residents, and their willingness to accept new patients is fundamental. Transportation challenges, common in rural settings, further complicate access to care. Therefore, the presence of easily accessible primary care within Sipsey would positively influence the "Lung Cancer Score," while its absence would significantly detract.

Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating the quality of care provided by existing medical facilities. This would require analyzing factors such as the availability of advanced diagnostic equipment (e.g., low-dose CT scanners for lung cancer screening), the implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols, and patient outcomes data (if available). Practices with a demonstrated commitment to lung cancer screening, early detection, and multidisciplinary care (involving pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists) would contribute positively to the "Lung Cancer Score." Furthermore, practices that actively participate in clinical trials or research related to lung cancer treatment would be considered highly valuable.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, improving access to specialists and follow-up care, especially in rural areas like Sipsey. The availability of telehealth consultations with pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists would enhance the "Lung Cancer Score." Practices that offer remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment or those at high risk would also be favorably assessed. The ease of use, technological infrastructure, and patient satisfaction with telemedicine services are essential considerations.

Mental health resources play a crucial role in the overall well-being of lung cancer patients. A diagnosis of lung cancer can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health services, including access to therapists, counselors, and support groups, would significantly impact the "Lung Cancer Score." Practices that integrate mental health support into their cancer care programs, providing resources for patients and their families, would be highly valued. The presence of support groups specifically for lung cancer patients would be a significant advantage.

Furthermore, an assessment of the local healthcare ecosystem should also consider the availability of resources such as smoking cessation programs. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, and access to effective smoking cessation programs is crucial for prevention. The presence of readily available and affordable smoking cessation programs, including counseling and medication, would positively impact the "Lung Cancer Score."

Data gathering for this analysis would involve multiple sources. Publicly available data from the HRSA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and state health departments would provide information on physician supply, healthcare facility locations, and some quality metrics. Patient reviews and online ratings could offer insights into patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. Information from local hospitals and clinics would be essential to assess the availability of specialized services, equipment, and treatment protocols. However, it is essential to note that these sources may not offer a complete picture and may be subject to limitations.

The "Lung Cancer Score" would then be derived by weighting each of these factors. For example, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialist physicians, and access to advanced diagnostic equipment might be given higher weights. The availability of telemedicine and mental health resources would also be weighted, although perhaps less heavily than factors directly related to diagnosis and treatment. The final score would be a composite, reflecting the overall strength of the healthcare infrastructure in supporting lung cancer patients.

This analysis is a hypothetical framework. Creating a truly useful and accurate "Lung Cancer Score" requires access to comprehensive, up-to-date data, sophisticated analytical tools, and expert medical knowledge. The goal is to highlight the importance of various factors in supporting lung cancer patients and to emphasize the need for a holistic approach to healthcare assessment.

**Call to Action:**

Want to visualize the healthcare landscape of ZIP Code 35584 and the surrounding area, including the location of medical facilities, physician availability, and other relevant data? Explore the power of location intelligence with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you gain a deeper understanding of healthcare access and identify areas where resources are most needed. Visit [Insert CartoChrome Website Link Here] to learn more and start exploring.