The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 35905, Gadsden, Alabama is 46 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.53 percent of the residents in 35905 has some form of health insurance. 33.27 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35905 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,480 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35905. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,276 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,385 health care providers accessible to residents in 35905, Gadsden, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35905, Gadsden, Alabama
Lung Cancer Score | 51 |
---|---|
People Score | 58 |
Provider Score | 46 |
Hospital Score | 27 |
Travel Score | 63 |
35905 | Gadsden | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The task requires a detailed analysis focusing on the availability of primary care physicians, their quality, and related resources within the context of lung cancer care in Gadsden, Alabama (ZIP code 35905). This analysis should include physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, all while maintaining a conversational tone and avoiding lists. The final section will include a call to action to CartoChrome maps.
Assessing the landscape of lung cancer care in Gadsden, Alabama, necessitates a thorough examination of the primary care infrastructure within ZIP code 35905. The foundation of effective lung cancer management often rests on the strength of the primary care network. Early detection, crucial for improved outcomes, is frequently initiated through primary care physician (PCP) referrals for screening and diagnostic tests. Therefore, the accessibility and quality of PCPs are paramount.
A critical metric to consider is the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio provides a snapshot of the availability of PCPs relative to the population. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility, potentially facilitating more proactive screening and earlier diagnosis. Determining the exact physician-to-patient ratio for ZIP code 35905 requires data analysis, which is beyond the scope of this analysis. However, accessing this data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or local healthcare organizations is a crucial first step.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices is a significant factor. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several criteria. These include the use of evidence-based guidelines for preventive care, the implementation of patient-centered care models, and the availability of specialized services. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in community outreach programs and patient education initiatives often demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive care. Researching patient reviews, conducting site visits (if possible), and consulting with local healthcare professionals can help identify these standout practices.
Telemedicine adoption presents another important aspect of primary care availability. Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and provide follow-up care via telemedicine can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of lung cancer management. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption among PCPs in 35905, including the types of services offered and the technologies utilized, is a key part of the overall evaluation.
The holistic approach to lung cancer care acknowledges the profound impact of mental health on patients. A lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can trigger a range of psychological challenges, including anxiety, depression, and fear. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care network is crucial. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, as well as support groups and other psychosocial interventions. Evaluating the extent to which PCPs in 35905 integrate mental health services into their practice, either directly or through referrals, is a critical component of this analysis.
Furthermore, the integration of smoking cessation programs within primary care is critical. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, and effective cessation programs can significantly reduce the risk of developing the disease. PCPs play a vital role in identifying smokers, providing counseling, and prescribing medications to help them quit. Assessing the availability and effectiveness of smoking cessation programs offered by PCPs in 35905 is essential.
The availability of specialists, particularly pulmonologists and oncologists, is also important. While primary care physicians are often the first point of contact, timely access to specialists is crucial for diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning. The proximity of specialists, wait times for appointments, and the coordination of care between PCPs and specialists all contribute to the overall quality of lung cancer care. Investigating these factors is a necessary step in assessing the healthcare landscape in Gadsden.
In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of lung cancer care in ZIP code 35905 requires a multi-faceted approach. Evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources are all essential components. This analysis should also include an examination of smoking cessation programs and the accessibility of specialists. The goal is to provide a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care infrastructure and to identify areas for improvement. The ultimate aim is to ensure that residents of Gadsden have access to high-quality, comprehensive lung cancer care.
To gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources in Gadsden and visualize the data discussed in this analysis, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide valuable insights into physician locations, patient demographics, and other relevant factors, enabling a more informed assessment of healthcare access and quality.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like