The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 36017, Clio, Alabama is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 48.97 percent of the residents in 36017 has some form of health insurance. 26.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 29.23 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36017 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 526 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36017. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 393 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 17 health care providers accessible to residents in 36017, Clio, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36017, Clio, Alabama
Lung Cancer Score | 2 |
---|---|
People Score | 29 |
Provider Score | 10 |
Hospital Score | 29 |
Travel Score | 12 |
36017 | Clio | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Clio, Alabama (ZIP Code 36017)
This analysis provides an assessment of the healthcare landscape within Clio, Alabama (ZIP Code 36017), focusing on factors relevant to lung cancer care and primary care accessibility. The evaluation considers physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, culminating in a qualitative "Lung Cancer Score" for the area. This score is not a numerical rating but a descriptive summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare infrastructure.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on robust primary care. Early detection and timely referrals are crucial for improved patient outcomes. Therefore, a primary focus of this analysis is the availability and accessibility of primary care physicians (PCPs) within the Clio area. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative screenings, and delayed diagnoses. Unfortunately, rural areas often face challenges in physician recruitment and retention, potentially resulting in a lower PCP-to-patient ratio compared to more urban environments.
Data on the exact physician-to-patient ratio for Clio is difficult to obtain with complete accuracy due to the dynamic nature of healthcare provider information. However, publicly available data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Alabama Department of Public Health can offer insights. These resources may identify areas classified as Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), which indicate a shortage of primary care providers. If Clio is designated as an HPSA, it suggests a potential challenge in accessing primary care. Further investigation would involve analyzing the number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code, cross-referencing this with the population data to estimate the ratio.
Beyond raw numbers, the characteristics of primary care practices are important. The presence of board-certified family medicine physicians, internal medicine specialists, and potentially, pulmonologists (though these are less common in primary care settings) is indicative of a well-rounded healthcare system. Practices with advanced diagnostic capabilities, such as on-site X-ray machines or access to CT scans, can facilitate quicker diagnoses and treatment planning for suspected lung cancer cases. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is another crucial factor. EHRs allow for seamless sharing of patient information between providers, improving care coordination and reducing the risk of medical errors.
Identifying standout practices within Clio requires a closer look at the specific offerings of each clinic. This would involve researching the qualifications of the physicians, the types of services offered, and patient reviews. Some practices may have a particular focus on preventative care, including lung cancer screening programs for high-risk individuals (e.g., current or former smokers). Others may have established relationships with specialists at larger hospitals or cancer centers, facilitating smooth referrals for complex cases. Publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) can be used to assess the quality of care provided by certain practices.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect of modern healthcare. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially in rural areas where travel distances can be a barrier. The availability of virtual consultations with PCPs, specialists, and mental health professionals can be a significant advantage for patients. Telemedicine can facilitate remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions, including lung cancer, and provide access to support groups and educational resources. Researching the telemedicine capabilities of local practices, including the types of services offered and the platforms used, is vital.
The mental health of lung cancer patients is often overlooked, yet it is a critical component of overall well-being. A cancer diagnosis can trigger anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health resources within the community is therefore a significant factor in the "Lung Cancer Score." This includes access to psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and support groups. Practices that integrate mental health services into their primary care offerings are particularly beneficial. The presence of community mental health centers or partnerships with local mental health organizations can also improve access to care.
Assessing the "Lung Cancer Score" for Clio, Alabama, requires synthesizing all the above factors. If the area demonstrates a low PCP-to-patient ratio, lacks easy access to specialists, and has limited telemedicine and mental health resources, the score would be negatively impacted. Conversely, if Clio has a reasonable physician-to-patient ratio, robust primary care practices with advanced diagnostic capabilities, a strong telemedicine infrastructure, and readily available mental health support, the score would be more favorable. The final score is a qualitative assessment, a reflection of the overall strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system in supporting lung cancer patients.
The challenges faced by rural communities like Clio highlight the need for innovative solutions to improve healthcare access and quality. Addressing physician shortages, expanding telemedicine capabilities, and integrating mental health services are crucial steps. This analysis provides a snapshot of the current situation, emphasizing the importance of continuous monitoring and improvement.
To further enhance your understanding of the healthcare landscape in Clio and other areas, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a visual representation of healthcare data, allowing you to explore physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant information in an interactive and user-friendly format. CartoChrome maps can provide a deeper understanding of the healthcare access and availability in the area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like