The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 36052, Mathews, Alabama is 91 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.80 percent of the residents in 36052 has some form of health insurance. 56.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 87.72 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36052 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 52 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36052. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 308 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 545 health care providers accessible to residents in 36052, Mathews, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36052, Mathews, Alabama
Lung Cancer Score | 98 |
---|---|
People Score | 97 |
Provider Score | 91 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 56 |
36052 | Mathews | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical "Lung Cancer Score" for primary care physicians within ZIP code 36052, encompassing the town of Mathews, Alabama. This score is a composite, considering factors relevant to early detection, treatment access, and supportive care for lung cancer patients. The data used is illustrative and for the purpose of this exercise; actual data would be required for a real-world assessment.
The Lung Cancer Score is not a definitive measure of physician quality but rather a gauge of the environment for lung cancer care within the specified area. It considers the availability of resources and the potential for timely and effective intervention.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical element. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delays in diagnosis, and potentially, less comprehensive care. In Mathews, the availability of primary care physicians is a crucial first step in early detection. The score would be negatively impacted if the physician-to-patient ratio is unfavorable. The analysis would consider the number of primary care physicians actively practicing within the ZIP code, the estimated population served, and the resulting ratio. Data from the US Census Bureau and state medical licensing boards would be essential for this calculation.
Standout practices would be identified based on their commitment to lung cancer screening and patient management. Practices demonstrating a proactive approach to lung cancer screening, such as offering low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for eligible patients (smokers and former smokers), would receive higher marks. This includes adherence to guidelines from organizations like the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). A practice that systematically identifies at-risk patients, educates them about screening, and facilitates the process would be highly valued.
The availability of on-site diagnostic capabilities, such as X-ray machines, would also be considered. Practices that can provide initial diagnostic tests, or at least have established relationships with local radiology facilities, would enhance their score. This reduces the time it takes for patients to receive essential tests.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially in rural areas. The ability of physicians to offer virtual consultations can improve access to care, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and supportive care. Practices that actively utilize telemedicine platforms for patient communication and care delivery would receive a positive boost to their score. This includes the use of secure video conferencing, remote monitoring tools, and patient portals.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and patients may experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The Lung Cancer Score would consider the availability of mental health services within the community and the extent to which primary care physicians are connected to these resources. This includes the presence of on-site mental health professionals, referrals to local therapists and counselors, and awareness of support groups. Practices that actively screen patients for mental health needs and provide appropriate referrals would be highly rated.
The score would also factor in the availability of smoking cessation programs and resources. Primary care physicians play a vital role in helping patients quit smoking, which is the leading cause of lung cancer. Practices that offer smoking cessation counseling, prescribe medications to aid in quitting, and refer patients to support groups would be recognized for their commitment to prevention and patient health.
The analysis would also examine the availability of palliative care services. Palliative care focuses on providing relief from the symptoms and stress of a serious illness. It is a crucial element in improving the quality of life for lung cancer patients, regardless of the stage of their disease. The score would consider the presence of palliative care specialists in the area and the ability of primary care physicians to make appropriate referrals.
The Lung Cancer Score for Mathews, Alabama, would be a dynamic measure. It would need to be updated regularly to reflect changes in physician availability, practice protocols, and the availability of local resources. The data would be compiled from various sources, including physician directories, healthcare provider websites, and public health data. The final score would be a composite, reflecting the overall environment for lung cancer care within the community.
In conclusion, the Lung Cancer Score for primary care in Mathews, AL, would be a comprehensive assessment of the resources and practices available to patients. It would highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and provide valuable insights for patients seeking care. The analysis would offer a snapshot of the current landscape, emphasizing the importance of early detection, access to treatment, and supportive care.
For a visual representation of the geographical distribution of these resources and a detailed analysis of healthcare access in Mathews, Alabama, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help visualize the availability of physicians, the location of healthcare facilities, and the proximity of patients to essential services. This can help identify areas with the greatest need and inform efforts to improve access to care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like