36790, Stanton, Alabama Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 36790, Stanton, Alabama is 41 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.01 percent of the residents in 36790 has some form of health insurance. 48.88 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.22 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36790 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 137 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36790. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 59 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1 health care providers accessible to residents in 36790, Stanton, Alabama.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36790 and Primary Care in Stanton

This analysis delves into the landscape of healthcare accessibility and quality, focusing on two distinct yet interconnected areas: the availability of primary care physicians in Stanton, and the perceived quality of care offered by doctors within ZIP code 36790. The ultimate goal is to assess the potential impact on lung cancer outcomes, considering factors that influence early detection, treatment adherence, and overall patient well-being. This is not a formal medical diagnosis or endorsement, but rather an analytical overview.

The analysis employs a "Lung Cancer Score" framework, a conceptual tool that considers several key indicators. These include physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Each of these factors can significantly influence a patient's journey from initial symptom recognition to successful treatment and recovery.

**ZIP Code 36790: A Microcosm of Healthcare Access**

ZIP code 36790, representing a specific geographic area, serves as a critical point of focus. The density of healthcare providers within this area is a primary concern. A low physician-to-patient ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing timely appointments, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. This can be particularly detrimental in lung cancer, where early detection is crucial for improved survival rates.

Data regarding the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 36790 is essential. Publicly available resources, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can provide estimates based on geographic data. A high ratio, indicating a scarcity of physicians, would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score. Conversely, a favorable ratio, reflecting a greater availability of primary care and specialist physicians, would positively influence the score.

The presence of standout practices within 36790 is another vital element. These practices are identified based on several factors: patient reviews, the availability of advanced diagnostic tools, and their participation in clinical trials. Practices with a strong reputation for patient care and a commitment to innovation can significantly improve the Lung Cancer Score. They often offer a higher level of care and may be more likely to implement evidence-based practices, leading to better patient outcomes.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that offer telehealth consultations, remote monitoring, and virtual follow-up appointments can positively influence the Lung Cancer Score. This allows for more frequent and convenient contact with physicians, which can improve adherence to treatment plans and facilitate early intervention.

Mental health resources are often overlooked, yet they are essential for patients battling lung cancer. The emotional toll of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery can be immense. Practices that offer or have access to mental health professionals, such as therapists or counselors, can significantly improve the Lung Cancer Score. These resources can help patients cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression that often accompany a cancer diagnosis.

**Primary Care Availability in Stanton: A Foundation for Lung Cancer Care**

The availability of primary care physicians in Stanton is a foundational element in the Lung Cancer Score analysis. Primary care physicians play a crucial role in early detection, patient education, and care coordination. They are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms, and they can initiate the diagnostic process, including ordering imaging scans and referring patients to specialists.

A robust primary care infrastructure in Stanton, characterized by a sufficient number of physicians and easy access to appointments, would positively influence the Lung Cancer Score. Conversely, a shortage of primary care physicians would negatively impact the score, potentially leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment.

The geographic distribution of primary care practices within Stanton is also important. If practices are concentrated in one area, patients in other parts of the city may face challenges in accessing care. This can lead to disparities in healthcare access and outcomes.

**Interplay and Impact on the Lung Cancer Score**

The factors discussed above are interconnected and influence each other. For example, the availability of telemedicine can partially mitigate the impact of a low physician-to-patient ratio. Similarly, the presence of mental health resources can improve patient outcomes, regardless of the physician-to-patient ratio.

The Lung Cancer Score is a holistic assessment. It considers the interplay of all these factors to provide a comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape. A high score indicates a favorable environment for lung cancer patients, with readily accessible care, advanced resources, and a supportive healthcare system. A low score suggests potential challenges, such as limited access to care, a lack of resources, and a need for improvement.

**Specific Considerations for 36790 and Stanton**

To provide a more specific analysis, we would need to gather data on several key areas. This includes:

* **Physician-to-patient ratios:** Data from HRSA or similar sources.
* **Practice profiles:** Information on the services offered by local practices, including diagnostic tools, telemedicine capabilities, and mental health resources.
* **Patient reviews:** Gathering and analyzing patient feedback to assess the quality of care.
* **Geographic distribution:** Mapping the locations of healthcare providers to assess access.

**Conclusion: Visualizing the Data with CartoChrome Maps**

Understanding the complexities of healthcare access and quality requires a visual approach. CartoChrome maps can be invaluable in this process. These maps can visually represent physician-to-patient ratios, the locations of standout practices, and the availability of mental health resources. By overlaying this data, we can identify areas of strength and weakness, allowing for targeted interventions and improvements.

The Lung Cancer Score analysis is an ongoing process. It requires continuous monitoring, data collection, and refinement. By using tools like CartoChrome maps, we can gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and identify opportunities to improve outcomes for lung cancer patients. Consider exploring the potential of CartoChrome maps to visualize and analyze the healthcare data for 36790 and Stanton. This can provide valuable insights and support informed decision-making.