The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 06264, Scotland, Connecticut is 41 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 79.33 percent of the residents in 06264 has some form of health insurance. 64.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 33.33 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06264 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 34 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06264. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 29 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 467 health care providers accessible to residents in 06264, Scotland, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06264, Scotland, Connecticut
Lung Cancer Score | 95 |
---|---|
People Score | 99 |
Provider Score | 41 |
Hospital Score | 72 |
Travel Score | 66 |
06264 | Scotland | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 06264 & Primary Care in Scotland**
This analysis evaluates the landscape of lung cancer care, focusing on two distinct regions: doctors practicing within ZIP code 06264 in the United States and the availability of primary care services in Scotland. The goal is to assess the resources available to patients, considering factors relevant to early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer, and to provide insights into areas for improvement. The analysis will include physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources.
**ZIP Code 06264: A Microcosm of US Healthcare**
ZIP code 06264, encompassing the town of Plainfield, Connecticut, provides a localized perspective on the challenges and opportunities in lung cancer care within the United States. The analysis begins by examining the physician-to-patient ratio. Data from the US Census Bureau and the Connecticut Department of Public Health will be utilized to determine the number of primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and oncologists practicing within the ZIP code and its surrounding areas. This ratio is a crucial indicator of access to care. A low ratio suggests potential difficulties in scheduling appointments, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. The analysis will compare this ratio to national averages and to ratios in similar demographic areas to provide context.
Identifying standout practices is critical. This involves researching local hospitals and clinics to identify those with a demonstrated commitment to lung cancer care. This includes facilities with advanced diagnostic equipment, such as low-dose CT scanners, and those that participate in clinical trials. The analysis will also assess the availability of multidisciplinary teams, including pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and nurses specializing in lung cancer care. The presence of these teams signifies a coordinated approach to treatment, which is associated with improved patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telemedicine, and its continued integration is vital for lung cancer care. The analysis will investigate the extent to which local practices offer telehealth consultations, remote monitoring of patients, and virtual support groups. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. It can also facilitate follow-up appointments and provide emotional support.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are essential for patients diagnosed with lung cancer. The analysis will evaluate the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, who specialize in oncology or have experience supporting patients with chronic illnesses. The availability of support groups, both in-person and virtual, will also be assessed. Addressing the psychological impact of a lung cancer diagnosis, including anxiety, depression, and fear, is crucial for improving patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans.
**Primary Care Availability in Scotland: A National Perspective**
Shifting focus to Scotland, the analysis examines the broader context of primary care services and their impact on lung cancer care. Scotland's National Health Service (NHS) provides universal healthcare, but access to primary care can vary depending on location and socioeconomic factors. The analysis will utilize data from NHS Scotland and the Scottish Government to assess the physician-to-patient ratio across different regions of Scotland. This will reveal potential disparities in access to care, which can affect early detection and timely treatment of lung cancer.
The analysis will investigate the implementation of lung cancer screening programs in Scotland. These programs, often involving low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals, are essential for detecting lung cancer at an early stage, when treatment is most effective. The analysis will assess the coverage of these programs, the eligibility criteria, and the participation rates. High participation rates are vital for maximizing the impact of screening programs and reducing lung cancer mortality.
The integration of technology in primary care is another important area of focus. The analysis will examine the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and their impact on care coordination. EHRs can facilitate the sharing of patient information between primary care physicians, specialists, and hospitals, leading to improved communication and more efficient care. The analysis will also assess the use of telemedicine in primary care, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring of patients.
The analysis will also consider the availability of mental health services within the NHS. The Scottish government has invested in improving mental health services, but access can still be a challenge. The analysis will assess the availability of mental health professionals in primary care settings and the referral pathways for patients needing specialized mental health support. Addressing the mental health needs of patients with lung cancer is crucial for improving their quality of life and overall well-being.
**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**
The analysis will compare the findings from ZIP code 06264 and Scotland. While the US healthcare system is different from Scotland’s NHS, both face challenges in ensuring equitable access to high-quality lung cancer care. The analysis will highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each system, providing insights into best practices and areas for improvement. For instance, the analysis might find that Scotland has a more robust screening program but faces challenges in primary care access in rural areas, while ZIP code 06264 has excellent specialists but may lack adequate mental health resources.
This analysis underscores the importance of understanding the local healthcare landscape. Access to care, the availability of specialized services, the adoption of technology, and the provision of mental health support are all crucial factors in improving lung cancer outcomes. By analyzing these factors, we can identify areas for improvement and work towards a future where all patients have access to the best possible care.
**Call to Action:**
Want to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in your area? Explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps. Visualize physician density, compare access to care across different regions, and identify areas that need more resources. Visit CartoChrome today to unlock the power of geographic data.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like