The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 06377, Sterling, Connecticut is 60 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.37 percent of the residents in 06377 has some form of health insurance. 43.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.72 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06377 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 812 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06377. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 389 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 566 health care providers accessible to residents in 06377, Sterling, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06377, Sterling, Connecticut
Lung Cancer Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 34 |
Provider Score | 60 |
Hospital Score | 61 |
Travel Score | 45 |
06377 | Sterling | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Sterling, CT (ZIP Code 06377)
This analysis delves into the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 06377, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, a crucial element in early detection and management. We examine physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health resources, ultimately aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of the care environment for individuals at risk or affected by lung cancer.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests upon robust primary care access. In Sterling, CT (06377), the availability of primary care physicians is a critical factor. Assessing this availability requires considering the physician-to-patient ratio. While precise, real-time data fluctuates, publicly available sources, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards, provide estimates. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and diagnoses. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, facilitating earlier intervention. The current physician-to-patient ratio within 06377 and the surrounding areas will be a key determinant of the Lung Cancer Score.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices plays a significant role. Certain practices may stand out due to their commitment to preventative care, including proactive lung cancer screening programs. These programs typically involve assessing individual risk factors, such as smoking history and exposure to environmental carcinogens, and recommending appropriate screenings, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans, for eligible individuals. Practices that actively promote and facilitate these screenings demonstrate a higher level of dedication to early detection, which is paramount in improving patient outcomes. Identifying these standout practices requires analyzing patient reviews, examining practice websites for information on screening protocols, and potentially contacting practices directly to inquire about their lung cancer care services.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor in the Lung Cancer Score. Telemedicine, encompassing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online educational resources, can significantly enhance access to care, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas. For individuals in 06377, telemedicine can reduce the need for travel, saving time and expense, and potentially improving adherence to treatment plans. Practices that offer telemedicine options, especially for follow-up appointments, medication management, and educational sessions, are likely to receive a higher score. The ease of access to these virtual services and the technical support offered by the practice will also be considered.
The mental health of patients facing a lung cancer diagnosis is often overlooked, but it is an essential component of comprehensive care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health resources, such as counseling services, support groups, and psychiatric referrals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The integration of mental health services, either within the practice or through referrals to external providers, is a significant indicator of a high-quality care environment. The availability of these resources and the ease of access to them will directly impact the Lung Cancer Score.
The analysis of these factors will be synthesized to generate a Lung Cancer Score for the primary care landscape in 06377. This score will not be a single number but rather a comprehensive assessment reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the care environment. The score will be influenced by the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of proactive screening programs, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources.
Furthermore, the analysis will consider the availability of specialized care within a reasonable distance of 06377. While this analysis focuses on primary care, the proximity to pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons is also crucial. Access to these specialists is essential for diagnosis, staging, treatment, and ongoing management of lung cancer. The analysis will consider the travel time to these specialists and the availability of specialized services, such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy, in the surrounding areas.
The final Lung Cancer Score will be a valuable tool for individuals seeking primary care in 06377, as well as for healthcare providers and policymakers. It will highlight areas where care is strong and identify areas where improvements are needed. This information can be used to inform healthcare decisions, advocate for better resources, and ultimately improve the outcomes for individuals affected by lung cancer.
The methodology for calculating the Lung Cancer Score will involve a multi-faceted approach. Publicly available data, such as physician directories, hospital websites, and health insurance provider information, will be utilized. Patient reviews, online forums, and other publicly accessible sources will be analyzed to gain insights into patient experiences and practice reputations. Direct contact with primary care practices may be necessary to gather specific information about their services and programs. The weighting of each factor will be determined based on its relative importance in influencing patient outcomes.
The resulting Lung Cancer Score will be presented in a clear and concise format, highlighting the key strengths and weaknesses of the primary care landscape in 06377. The score will be accompanied by a detailed report that provides supporting evidence and recommendations for improvement. This report will serve as a valuable resource for individuals, healthcare providers, and policymakers seeking to improve the quality of lung cancer care in Sterling, CT.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in 06377 and the surrounding areas, including the locations of primary care practices, specialist facilities, and access to resources, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive visualization of the data, allowing you to explore the healthcare environment in detail.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like