The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 06409, Centerbrook, Connecticut is 66 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.26 percent of the residents in 06409 has some form of health insurance. 50.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.11 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06409 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 169 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06409. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 117 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,150 health care providers accessible to residents in 06409, Centerbrook, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06409, Centerbrook, Connecticut
Lung Cancer Score | 82 |
---|---|
People Score | 95 |
Provider Score | 66 |
Hospital Score | 47 |
Travel Score | 35 |
06409 | Centerbrook | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Centerbrook, CT (ZIP Code 06409)
This analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) practicing within ZIP code 06409, specifically focusing on Centerbrook, CT. The score considers factors relevant to lung cancer prevention, early detection, and patient support, ultimately reflecting the overall quality of care available. The analysis also examines primary care availability within the Centerbrook area.
The foundation of a strong Lung Cancer Score lies in accessible and proactive primary care. Centerbrook, a small community, presents both opportunities and challenges in this regard. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. Ideally, a lower ratio indicates better access to care, allowing PCPs more time to dedicate to individual patient needs, including preventative screenings like those for lung cancer. However, precise physician-to-patient ratios require access to comprehensive datasets, including the total number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code and the estimated population served. Without this granular data, a definitive ratio cannot be calculated. Nevertheless, the overall impression is that Centerbrook, being a relatively rural area, may face challenges in physician availability compared to more densely populated regions.
The availability of primary care is further influenced by the presence of standout practices. Identifying these practices requires a deeper dive into their specific offerings. Are there practices that actively promote lung cancer screening for high-risk individuals, such as current or former smokers, or those with a family history of the disease? Do they utilize evidence-based guidelines for screening eligibility and follow-up care? Do they have robust systems for patient education about lung cancer risk factors and early detection? Practices demonstrating these characteristics would contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score. Conversely, practices that lack these elements would negatively impact the score.
Another crucial factor is telemedicine adoption. The ability to offer virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments, prescription refills, and even initial consultations, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically remote areas. Telemedicine can also facilitate communication between PCPs and specialists, streamlining the referral process for suspected lung cancer cases. The extent of telemedicine adoption among PCPs in 06409 directly influences the Lung Cancer Score, with higher adoption rates generally correlating with a better score.
Beyond the purely medical aspects, mental health resources play a vital role in patient well-being, particularly for individuals facing a potential or confirmed lung cancer diagnosis. The stress and anxiety associated with such a diagnosis can be overwhelming. PCPs who have established referral networks with mental health professionals, including therapists and psychiatrists, are better equipped to provide holistic care. The availability and accessibility of these mental health resources within the Centerbrook area are essential components of the Lung Cancer Score. The score is positively affected by the presence of readily available mental health support, which can improve patient outcomes and overall quality of life.
The specifics of each practice's approach to preventative care, including lung cancer screening, are paramount. This includes the type of screening offered (e.g., low-dose computed tomography or LDCT), the frequency of screening, and the criteria used to determine patient eligibility. Practices that adhere to the latest guidelines from organizations like the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) will contribute favorably to the Lung Cancer Score. The score is also influenced by the practice's commitment to educating patients about the benefits and risks of lung cancer screening, ensuring informed decision-making.
Furthermore, the efficiency of the referral process is critical. When a PCP suspects lung cancer, a timely and seamless referral to a pulmonologist or oncologist is essential. Practices with established relationships with specialists, allowing for rapid scheduling and communication of patient information, contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score. The speed and effectiveness of the referral process can significantly impact a patient's chances of survival.
The integration of patient education materials is also crucial. Providing patients with clear, concise, and accessible information about lung cancer risk factors, symptoms, and screening options is a key component of proactive care. Practices that offer educational brochures, websites, or other resources that are easily understood by patients contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score. The more informed a patient is, the better equipped they are to participate in their own care and make informed decisions.
The overall Lung Cancer Score for PCPs in 06409 is a complex metric. It’s a composite of various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios (where available), the presence of standout practices with proactive screening programs, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, the efficiency of the referral process, and the integration of patient education. Without detailed data on each of these aspects, a precise score cannot be determined. However, based on the general characteristics of Centerbrook, it is likely that the score could be improved by increasing physician availability, promoting the adoption of telemedicine, and strengthening referral networks with specialists and mental health professionals.
The challenges of a rural area like Centerbrook necessitate creative solutions. Collaboration between PCPs, specialists, and local hospitals is crucial. This could involve shared resources, coordinated care pathways, and joint educational initiatives. Furthermore, leveraging technology, such as telemedicine, can help bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care.
In conclusion, assessing the Lung Cancer Score for PCPs in Centerbrook, CT, requires a detailed examination of various factors. Improving the score would involve addressing physician availability, enhancing telemedicine adoption, and strengthening referral networks. Access to comprehensive data is essential for a precise assessment.
Want to visualize the healthcare landscape of Centerbrook and surrounding areas? Explore how healthcare access, physician locations, and other critical data points interact using interactive maps. Discover how CartoChrome maps can help you understand the nuances of healthcare accessibility in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like