06480, Portland, Connecticut Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 06480, Portland, Connecticut is 82 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.36 percent of the residents in 06480 has some form of health insurance. 28.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06480 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,324 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06480. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,545 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,580 health care providers accessible to residents in 06480, Portland, Connecticut.

This analysis assesses the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 06480 (likely Wallingford, Connecticut), and primary care access in Portland, with a focus on factors influencing patient outcomes. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, emphasizing aspects relevant to individuals diagnosed with or at risk of lung cancer. This includes physician availability, innovative care models, and support services.

The analysis begins by acknowledging the inherent complexity of evaluating healthcare quality. A "Lung Cancer Score" is a simplified construct, drawing on available data to offer a comparative perspective. It is not a definitive judgment but rather a starting point for informed decision-making.

**Lung Cancer Score: 06480 (Wallingford, CT)**

The success of lung cancer treatment hinges on early detection and access to comprehensive care. In ZIP code 06480, the availability of pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons is crucial. Assessing physician-to-patient ratios is the first step. Data from the Connecticut Department of Public Health, combined with information from professional organizations like the American Medical Association (AMA), can provide a baseline understanding. A higher ratio of specialists per capita generally suggests greater accessibility. However, this metric alone is insufficient.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. This involves evaluating the practices of local physicians. Are they affiliated with accredited cancer centers? Do they participate in clinical trials? Do they have experience treating a high volume of lung cancer patients? Information regarding these factors can be gleaned from hospital websites, physician profiles, and patient reviews (while acknowledging the limitations of the latter).

Standout practices should be highlighted. These are institutions or individual physicians who demonstrate excellence in lung cancer care. This might include those who offer advanced diagnostic techniques like minimally invasive biopsies or employ cutting-edge treatment modalities, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Practices with multidisciplinary teams, bringing together pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and other specialists, should be considered as well.

Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The ability to consult with specialists remotely can be a significant advantage, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility issues. Investigating the extent to which local physicians and hospitals offer telemedicine services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and patient education, is essential.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critically important for lung cancer patients. A cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and access to mental health support is vital. The analysis should explore the availability of oncology social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists who specialize in cancer care. Are these resources integrated into the treatment plans of local practices? Are support groups available?

**Primary Care Availability: Portland**

Primary care serves as the gateway to the healthcare system. Early detection of lung cancer often begins with a primary care physician (PCP) who can screen patients for risk factors and order necessary diagnostic tests.

Assessing primary care availability in Portland requires evaluating physician-to-patient ratios. Data from the Oregon Health Authority and other sources can be used to determine the number of PCPs per capita. A higher ratio generally indicates better access.

The location of primary care practices is also important. Are they geographically accessible to residents of Portland? Are there practices in underserved areas? The analysis should consider the distribution of practices throughout the city.

The ability to schedule timely appointments is another crucial factor. Long wait times can delay diagnosis and treatment. The analysis should investigate the average wait times for appointments with PCPs in Portland.

The availability of after-hours and weekend care is also important. Patients may need medical attention outside of regular business hours. The analysis should consider the availability of urgent care clinics and other after-hours care options.

The use of electronic health records (EHRs) by primary care practices is another factor. EHRs can improve communication and coordination of care. The analysis should investigate the adoption of EHRs by primary care practices in Portland.

**Connecting the Dots: Implications for Lung Cancer Patients**

The availability of specialists in 06480, coupled with the strength of primary care in Portland, creates a complex picture. Patients in 06480 may need to travel to access specialized care. The efficiency and quality of primary care in Portland can significantly impact the likelihood of early detection and referral.

Patients should be proactive in their healthcare. They should research physicians and hospitals, ask questions about their treatment plans, and seek second opinions if needed. They should also advocate for themselves and ensure they have access to the resources they need.

This analysis provides a starting point for understanding the healthcare landscape in these areas. It is important to remember that healthcare is constantly evolving, and the information presented here may change over time.

**Call to Action**

For a visual representation of these healthcare factors, including physician locations, practice affiliations, and potential access challenges, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a deeper dive into the data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment in these areas.