Lung Cancer Score

20036, Washington, District of Columbia Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.35 percent of the residents in 20036 has some form of health insurance. 11.72 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 91.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20036 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 88 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20036. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 624 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,221 health care providers accessible to residents in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia.

Health Scores in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia

Lung Cancer Score 94
People Score 75
Provider Score 100
Hospital Score 36
Travel Score 63

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

20036 Washington District of Columbia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 20036, Washington, District of Columbia

## Lung Cancer Score: An Analysis for Doctors in ZIP Code 20036 and Primary Care Availability in Washington

This analysis assesses the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 20036 (Washington, D.C.) and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington, D.C., considering factors crucial to patient outcomes, including access to care, physician expertise, and supportive services. A "Lung Cancer Score" is implicitly derived by examining these elements, though a single numerical score isn't presented. This approach allows for a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem.

ZIP code 20036, encompassing a significant portion of downtown Washington, D.C., presents a unique healthcare environment. The presence of numerous federal agencies, lobbying groups, and international organizations contributes to a diverse and often highly insured population. This, in turn, influences the types of healthcare services available and the expectations of patients. The proximity to major hospitals and research institutions, like MedStar Washington Hospital Center and George Washington University Hospital, is a considerable advantage. These institutions often house specialized oncology departments and cutting-edge treatment options for lung cancer.

However, access to care, particularly for primary care, is a critical determinant of early detection and effective management of lung cancer. The physician-to-patient ratio within 20036, and across Washington, D.C., is a crucial indicator. While specific, granular data on this ratio varies, the overall trend suggests a potential challenge. High patient loads can limit the time physicians have to dedicate to individual patients, potentially impacting the thoroughness of screenings and the detailedness of discussions about risk factors like smoking history.

Primary care physicians (PCPs) are the gatekeepers to early detection. Their role in identifying potential lung cancer cases through regular checkups, smoking cessation counseling, and ordering appropriate screenings, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for high-risk individuals, is paramount. The availability of PCPs, their willingness to proactively screen, and their ability to navigate the complexities of insurance coverage for these screenings are all essential factors in the “Lung Cancer Score.”

Standout practices within 20036 and the surrounding areas are likely those that prioritize a patient-centered approach. This includes not only providing expert medical care but also offering comprehensive support services. These practices may have dedicated oncology nurses, patient navigators, and social workers who can assist patients with navigating the complexities of treatment, insurance, and emotional support. They might also be actively involved in clinical trials, offering patients access to the latest advancements in lung cancer treatment.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Practices that have embraced telemedicine offer patients greater flexibility and convenience, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and consultations. Telemedicine can also improve access to specialists for patients who live further away or have mobility limitations. The availability of telemedicine services, especially for patients with lung cancer, directly impacts the “Lung Cancer Score.”

Mental health resources are another crucial component of comprehensive lung cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, are better equipped to support patients through their treatment journey. The availability of mental health support, particularly for patients facing the emotional and physical challenges of lung cancer, enhances the overall quality of care.

The effectiveness of smoking cessation programs is another important consideration. Lung cancer is strongly linked to smoking, and successful cessation programs are crucial for preventing new cases and improving the outcomes of existing patients. Practices that offer evidence-based smoking cessation counseling, medications, and support groups contribute positively to the “Lung Cancer Score.”

The insurance landscape in Washington, D.C., also influences access to care. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has expanded insurance coverage, but disparities in access to care still exist. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer financial assistance programs to patients who need it are more likely to provide equitable care.

The overall "Lung Cancer Score" for the area reflects a complex interplay of factors. While the presence of major medical institutions and specialized oncology departments in the area is a significant strength, challenges remain regarding access to primary care, physician workloads, and the availability of comprehensive support services. The integration of telemedicine, robust mental health resources, and effective smoking cessation programs are essential for improving the "Lung Cancer Score."

Understanding the spatial distribution of healthcare resources is key to improving access and outcomes. CartoChrome maps offer a valuable tool for visualizing these patterns. By mapping the locations of primary care physicians, oncologists, hospitals, and support services, CartoChrome can help identify areas with the greatest needs and inform strategies for improving care delivery.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Washington, D.C., and to visualize the distribution of critical resources, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. They offer a dynamic and informative way to analyze the factors influencing lung cancer care and to identify opportunities for improvement.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 20036, Washington, District of Columbia

You may also like

20006, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 0.47 Miles

Total Population:

20005, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 0.56 Miles

Total Population:

20037, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 0.77 Miles

Total Population:

20045, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 0.84 Miles

Total Population:

20009, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 1.06 Miles

Total Population:

20004, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 1.18 Miles

Total Population:

20053, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 1.28 Miles

Total Population:

20001, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 1.40 Miles

Total Population:

20007, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20036: 1.77 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia