20064, Washington, District of Columbia Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.99 percent of the residents in 20064 has some form of health insurance. 8.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 93.01 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20064 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 494 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 18 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20064. An estimate of 21 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 12,289 health care providers accessible to residents in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Physicians in ZIP Code 20064 and Primary Care Availability in Washington, DC**

This analysis explores the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 20064, focusing on physician availability, primary care access, and related resources in the broader Washington, D.C. area. We aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, considering factors that influence patient outcomes and overall well-being. This is not a simple ranking, but a complex evaluation.

ZIP code 20064, encompassing the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and surrounding areas, presents a unique healthcare ecosystem. The presence of the NIH significantly impacts the medical landscape, attracting highly specialized physicians and researchers. However, proximity to world-class institutions doesn't automatically translate to optimal care accessibility for all residents.

One crucial factor is the physician-to-patient ratio. While precise figures for 20064 are difficult to obtain, the overall physician density in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area is relatively high compared to the national average. This suggests a potentially favorable environment for accessing medical care. However, this density doesn't guarantee equitable distribution. Specialists, including pulmonologists and oncologists, may be concentrated in specific areas, potentially creating access challenges for those living further from major medical centers.

Primary care availability is a cornerstone of effective lung cancer care. Early detection through regular screenings and prompt referrals are vital. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the Washington, D.C. area, and specifically within 20064, is a critical indicator of overall healthcare access. The presence of a robust primary care network ensures that individuals have a point of contact for preventative care, symptom management, and referrals to specialists when needed.

The quality of primary care practices varies. Some practices stand out for their commitment to patient-centered care, proactive screening protocols, and efficient referral processes. These practices often utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively, facilitating seamless communication between primary care physicians and specialists. They may also offer extended hours, weekend appointments, and multilingual services to accommodate diverse patient needs. Identifying these standout practices requires examining patient reviews, assessing the availability of services, and evaluating the integration of technology.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The ability to access healthcare remotely can significantly improve access for patients who face geographical barriers, mobility limitations, or transportation challenges. The extent to which primary care practices and specialists in 20064 and the broader D.C. area have embraced telemedicine is a key factor in assessing healthcare accessibility. This includes the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions, and the use of telehealth platforms for follow-up appointments.

Mental health resources are often overlooked, yet they play a crucial role in lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Access to mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors, is essential for supporting patients' overall well-being. The availability of these resources within the healthcare system, including integrated mental health services within primary care practices and oncology centers, significantly impacts the quality of care.

Furthermore, the availability of support groups and patient education programs is crucial. These resources provide patients with opportunities to connect with others facing similar challenges, share experiences, and learn coping strategies. The presence of these support systems can improve patients' emotional resilience and enhance their ability to navigate the complexities of cancer treatment.

The NIH's presence in 20064 offers both advantages and disadvantages. The NIH's research and clinical trials can provide access to cutting-edge treatments and innovative therapies. However, navigating the NIH system can be complex, and not all patients may be eligible for participation in clinical trials. Additionally, the focus on research may sometimes overshadow the importance of providing comprehensive, patient-centered care.

Evaluating the overall healthcare environment in 20064 requires a holistic approach. It involves assessing physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the presence of support systems. It also requires considering the unique characteristics of the population served, including their socioeconomic status, cultural background, and access to transportation.

The broader Washington, D.C. area presents a mixed picture. While the city boasts a high concentration of medical professionals and world-renowned institutions, disparities in healthcare access persist. Factors such as insurance coverage, socioeconomic status, and geographic location can significantly impact a patient's ability to receive timely and effective care.

The quality of care also varies across different healthcare systems and practices. Some institutions excel in providing comprehensive, patient-centered care, while others may struggle to meet the needs of their patients. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each system requires a detailed analysis of patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and the integration of technology.

In conclusion, the healthcare landscape in 20064 and the surrounding Washington, D.C. area is complex. While the presence of the NIH and a high concentration of medical professionals offers potential benefits, access to care can vary. Evaluating the healthcare environment requires a nuanced understanding of physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the presence of support systems. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the challenges and opportunities in lung cancer care.

**For a visual representation of physician locations, healthcare access, and related data in the Washington, D.C. area, explore CartoChrome maps. Click here to start visualizing the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape.**