Lung Cancer Score

20240, Washington, District of Columbia Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20240 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20240 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20240. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,392 health care providers accessible to residents in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia.

Health Scores in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

Lung Cancer Score 65
People Score 1
Provider Score 100
Hospital Score 53
Travel Score 60

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

20240 Washington District of Columbia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Washington, D.C. (ZIP Code 20240) and Primary Care Availability

This analysis assesses the landscape of lung cancer care and primary care access in Washington, D.C., specifically focusing on ZIP code 20240 (which encompasses areas surrounding the U.S. Department of State) and the broader context of primary care availability within the city. The aim is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to patients, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health services. This is not a simple ranking, but rather a holistic evaluation of the healthcare ecosystem's strengths and weaknesses in relation to lung cancer care and primary care access.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on accessible and robust primary care. Early detection is crucial, and primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. The availability of PCPs, therefore, significantly impacts the timeliness of diagnosis and treatment. Washington, D.C., like many urban centers, faces challenges in PCP distribution. While the city boasts a high concentration of medical professionals overall, access isn't always evenly distributed. Areas with a higher concentration of government employees and international organizations, like ZIP code 20240, may present unique demographic factors influencing healthcare utilization patterns.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A lower ratio (more physicians per capita) generally indicates better access. However, this metric alone doesn't tell the whole story. The type of physicians, their specialization, and their willingness to accept new patients are equally important. The availability of pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons is particularly vital for lung cancer patients. In the context of 20240, the proximity to major medical centers and research institutions like Georgetown University Hospital and MedStar Washington Hospital Center potentially offers a higher concentration of specialists. However, this doesn't guarantee ease of access.

Standout practices are those that demonstrate excellence in patient care, research, and community outreach. Identifying these practices requires analyzing various factors, including patient satisfaction scores, clinical outcomes, participation in clinical trials, and the adoption of innovative technologies. Practices that proactively screen high-risk individuals (e.g., smokers) for lung cancer, utilizing low-dose CT scans, deserve recognition. Similarly, practices that integrate multidisciplinary teams, involving pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, and supportive care staff (nurses, social workers, psychologists), are often better equipped to provide comprehensive care.

Telemedicine adoption has transformed healthcare delivery, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. For lung cancer patients, telemedicine offers several advantages, including convenient follow-up appointments, remote monitoring of symptoms, and access to specialists who may not be geographically accessible. The degree to which practices in 20240 and across Washington, D.C., have embraced telemedicine is a key indicator of their responsiveness to patient needs and their willingness to leverage technology to improve care. This includes the availability of virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and the use of digital tools for patient education and communication.

The integration of mental health resources is another crucial aspect of comprehensive lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can trigger significant emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and fear. Practices that recognize this and offer integrated mental health services, such as counseling, support groups, and access to psychiatrists, are better equipped to support patients' overall well-being. This integration can take various forms, from having mental health professionals on staff to establishing partnerships with local mental health organizations. The availability of these resources, especially in the context of a highly stressed population like those working in the State Department vicinity, is paramount.

Primary care availability within Washington, D.C., is a broader concern. The city's diverse population and varying socioeconomic factors influence access to care. Areas with a higher concentration of underserved populations may experience greater challenges in accessing primary care. This can lead to delayed diagnoses and poorer health outcomes, including those related to lung cancer. The availability of affordable insurance, transportation, and language services also plays a significant role in access.

The specific challenges within ZIP code 20240, such as the high-stress nature of many jobs and the international nature of the population, can further complicate access to care. Language barriers, cultural differences, and the transient nature of some residents can pose unique challenges for healthcare providers. Practices that are culturally sensitive and able to provide care in multiple languages are better positioned to serve this population effectively.

The quality of lung cancer care is also influenced by access to cutting-edge treatments and clinical trials. Major medical centers in the Washington, D.C., area often participate in clinical trials, offering patients access to innovative therapies. The availability of these trials, along with the expertise of the medical staff, is a significant factor in determining the quality of care.

The overall assessment of lung cancer care and primary care availability in Washington, D.C., and specifically in ZIP code 20240, is complex. While the area benefits from the presence of major medical institutions and a high concentration of healthcare professionals, challenges remain in terms of equitable access, the integration of mental health services, and the adoption of telemedicine. The effectiveness of the healthcare system depends not only on the availability of specialists but also on the strength of the primary care network, the responsiveness of practices to patient needs, and the ability to address the unique challenges faced by the population.

For a visual representation of healthcare access, physician distribution, and other relevant data points within Washington, D.C., and the surrounding areas, we encourage you to explore interactive maps and data visualizations. CartoChrome maps can provide valuable insights into the healthcare landscape, allowing you to identify areas with the greatest needs and assess the availability of resources.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

You may also like

20245, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 0.41 Miles

Total Population:

20230, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 0.51 Miles

Total Population:

20204, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 0.74 Miles

Total Population:

20228, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 0.85 Miles

Total Population:

20202, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 1.39 Miles

Total Population:

20260, Washington, District of Columbia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 1.70 Miles

Total Population:

20190, Reston, Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 16.73 Miles

Total Population:

20191, Reston, Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 16.93 Miles

Total Population:

20194, Reston, Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 20240: 17.22 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia