The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 20317, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20317 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20317 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20317. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 179 health care providers accessible to residents in 20317, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20317, Washington, District of Columbia
| Lung Cancer Score | 89 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 39 |
| Provider Score | 100 |
| Hospital Score | 53 |
| Travel Score | 65 |
| 20317 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score: A Deep Dive into Healthcare in ZIP Code 20317 and Washington State
This analysis provides a nuanced understanding of healthcare accessibility and quality related to lung cancer within ZIP Code 20317 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington State. We will evaluate key factors influencing patient outcomes, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This information, synthesized into a “Lung Cancer Score,” aims to offer a comprehensive perspective on the healthcare landscape, ultimately informing both patient choices and strategic improvements within the system.
ZIP Code 20317, likely encompassing a specific area within a larger metropolitan region (for example, Washington, D.C.), demands a localized assessment. While national averages offer a baseline, hyperlocal conditions significantly impact access to care. Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and potentially poorer outcomes for lung cancer patients. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility, enabling earlier interventions and improved patient management. This ratio must be broken down by specialty, specifically focusing on pulmonologists, oncologists, and primary care physicians. The availability of these specialists directly impacts the speed and quality of lung cancer care.
Washington State's overall primary care landscape directly influences the health of residents in 20317. The state's primary care infrastructure acts as the crucial first line of defense, responsible for early detection, referrals, and ongoing management of chronic conditions, including those that elevate lung cancer risk. Insufficient primary care availability, characterized by shortages of family physicians and internal medicine specialists, can lead to delayed diagnoses and reduced preventative care, ultimately contributing to a higher incidence of late-stage lung cancer. The state's commitment to expanding primary care access, especially in underserved areas, is a critical factor in improving lung cancer outcomes.
Identifying standout practices within and around 20317 is crucial. These are healthcare providers or institutions that demonstrate exceptional performance in lung cancer care. This evaluation considers factors such as: adherence to evidence-based guidelines, patient satisfaction scores, survival rates, and the utilization of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials and offer comprehensive multidisciplinary care, including pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists, are particularly noteworthy. Their success serves as a model for other providers and can inform best practices across the region.
The adoption of telemedicine is another vital consideration. Telemedicine, encompassing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient education, has the potential to significantly improve access to lung cancer care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. The ability to connect with specialists remotely, receive timely follow-up care, and manage symptoms from home can enhance patient comfort and improve overall outcomes. The level of telemedicine integration within practices in 20317 and across Washington State is a key indicator of healthcare innovation and accessibility.
Mental health resources play a critical, yet often overlooked, role in lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis, particularly lung cancer, can have a devastating impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. Anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges are common. Access to mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors, is crucial for supporting patients throughout their treatment journey. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, or have established referral networks, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of lung cancer patients. The availability and accessibility of these resources directly impact the quality of life and overall prognosis for individuals battling this disease.
Furthermore, the availability of support groups and patient navigation services can significantly improve the patient experience. Support groups provide a platform for patients to connect with others facing similar challenges, share experiences, and receive emotional support. Patient navigators assist patients in navigating the complex healthcare system, coordinating appointments, and accessing resources. The presence of these supportive services contributes to a more patient-centered approach to care.
The "Lung Cancer Score" for 20317 and Washington State would be derived from a weighted analysis of these factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, particularly for relevant specialists, would carry significant weight. The presence of standout practices and the degree of telemedicine adoption would also be heavily weighted. Mental health resource availability and the presence of supportive services would contribute to the score. The overall score would provide a comparative assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses within the healthcare landscape.
Ultimately, this analysis reveals that improving lung cancer outcomes necessitates a multifaceted approach. It requires addressing physician shortages, promoting the adoption of telemedicine, integrating mental health services, and supporting the development of patient-centered care models. The “Lung Cancer Score” serves as a valuable tool for identifying areas for improvement and guiding strategic investments in healthcare infrastructure.
To visualize and explore the spatial distribution of these critical healthcare resources, and to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 20317 and across Washington State, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for the visualization of complex healthcare data, enabling informed decision-making and strategic planning.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
