The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 30236, Jonesboro, Georgia is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 77.86 percent of the residents in 30236 has some form of health insurance. 35.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30236 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 13,699 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30236. An estimate of 10 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,248 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 11,836 health care providers accessible to residents in 30236, Jonesboro, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30236, Jonesboro, Georgia
Lung Cancer Score | 25 |
---|---|
People Score | 7 |
Provider Score | 73 |
Hospital Score | 10 |
Travel Score | 65 |
30236 | Jonesboro | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis focuses on evaluating the landscape of lung cancer care and primary care access within ZIP code 30236 (Jonesboro, Georgia), considering key factors like physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support. The aim is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare ecosystem, particularly for individuals navigating lung cancer diagnoses and treatment.
The core challenge in assessing lung cancer care centers on the availability of specialized expertise. Within 30236, the presence of pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists is crucial. A high concentration of these specialists directly translates to better access to early diagnosis, staging, treatment, and supportive care. Physician-to-patient ratios become a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer specialists per capita, can lead to longer wait times for consultations, delayed treatment initiation, and potentially poorer outcomes. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests a more readily accessible and responsive healthcare system.
Primary care availability further influences the lung cancer journey. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a vital role in early detection through screening, such as recommending low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals. They also manage comorbidities, coordinate care with specialists, and provide ongoing support throughout treatment and recovery. The density of PCPs in the area, alongside their ability to effectively navigate the complexities of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, is paramount.
Standout practices within 30236 deserve specific consideration. Identifying practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, employ advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies, and actively participate in clinical trials is essential. These practices often serve as beacons of excellence, offering patients access to cutting-edge therapies and a higher standard of care. Examining their patient satisfaction scores, outcomes data (where available), and the integration of multidisciplinary teams (including nurses, social workers, and therapists) provides valuable insights.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients who may have mobility limitations or live in areas with limited specialist availability. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies, offering a range of virtual services, demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and improved care delivery. This includes the use of secure video conferencing platforms, remote patient monitoring devices, and patient portals for easy communication and information access.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are integral to the overall well-being of lung cancer patients. A lung cancer diagnosis, and the subsequent treatment, can trigger a range of emotional and psychological challenges, including anxiety, depression, and fear. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors, is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models, either through on-site providers or referral networks, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. This integration should include access to support groups, individual therapy, and medication management when necessary.
Within the context of 30236, the assessment should delve into the specific practices and hospitals serving the area. This involves researching the affiliations of physicians, the technologies available at each facility, and the types of support services offered. For example, does a particular practice offer comprehensive lung cancer screening programs? Does a hospital have a dedicated lung cancer clinic with a multidisciplinary team? Are there readily available resources for smoking cessation? The answers to these questions will help paint a more complete picture of the healthcare landscape.
Furthermore, understanding the insurance landscape is vital. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, is a significant factor in access to care. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance providers ensure that more residents can access the services they need. The availability of financial assistance programs for patients struggling with the cost of care is also a critical consideration.
The quality of care is not solely dependent on the presence of specialists and resources. It also hinges on the coordination of care. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) and implement robust communication protocols between different specialists are more likely to deliver seamless and efficient care. This also includes the ability to share patient information securely and efficiently, ensuring that all providers involved in a patient's care are on the same page.
The analysis should also consider the patient experience. This includes factors such as wait times for appointments, the ease of scheduling, the clarity of communication from healthcare providers, and the overall comfort and convenience of the care setting. Patient reviews and testimonials can provide valuable insights into the patient experience.
In conclusion, evaluating the lung cancer care landscape within 30236 requires a comprehensive approach, taking into account physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The goal is to provide a clear understanding of the healthcare ecosystem, empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their care.
Ready to explore the healthcare landscape of 30236 in a visually engaging way? Visit CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of the resources available in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like