The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 30360, Atlanta, Georgia is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 77.09 percent of the residents in 30360 has some form of health insurance. 26.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.92 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30360 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,693 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 52 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30360. An estimate of 31 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,662 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 28,922 health care providers accessible to residents in 30360, Atlanta, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30360, Atlanta, Georgia
| Lung Cancer Score | 74 | 
|---|---|
| People Score | 30 | 
| Provider Score | 74 | 
| Hospital Score | 52 | 
| Travel Score | 72 | 
| 30360 | Atlanta | Georgia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: 30360 and Atlanta Primary Care
Analyzing the landscape of lung cancer care within the 30360 ZIP code and the broader context of primary care availability in Atlanta requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider access to physicians, the quality of care provided, and the support systems available to patients facing this challenging disease. This analysis, framed as a "Lung Cancer Score," assesses these factors to provide a comprehensive overview.
The 30360 ZIP code, encompassing a portion of Atlanta, presents a unique set of circumstances. While the city boasts significant medical resources, localized disparities can impact access to care. Our analysis begins by examining physician-to-patient ratios. A higher ratio of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists per capita generally indicates better access to preventative screenings, early diagnosis, and ongoing management of lung cancer. Data from the Georgia Composite Medical Board, combined with population estimates for 30360, provides a baseline. We must account for the geographic distribution of these physicians within the ZIP code, identifying areas that might be underserved.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care delivered is paramount. Assessing this involves evaluating the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as the use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for high-risk individuals. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated the efficacy of LDCT in reducing lung cancer mortality. We need to investigate the prevalence of LDCT screening within 30360, focusing on the percentage of eligible patients who are receiving this potentially life-saving test. Furthermore, we must evaluate the timeliness of diagnosis and treatment, including the time from initial suspicion to biopsy, staging, and the initiation of treatment. This requires analyzing data on diagnostic turnaround times and treatment initiation intervals.
The presence of standout practices in the 30360 area significantly impacts the Lung Cancer Score. These practices may demonstrate excellence in several areas. This includes a commitment to early detection through proactive screening programs, the utilization of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, and a patient-centered approach to care. Researching the reputations of specific practices, including patient reviews, physician ratings, and peer-reviewed publications, can help identify those that are leading the way in lung cancer care. We must look for practices that offer multidisciplinary teams, integrating pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, radiologists, and other specialists to provide comprehensive care.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas. The availability of telehealth consultations with pulmonologists and oncologists can improve access to care, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and supportive care. We must assess the availability of telemedicine services within 30360, including the types of services offered, the platforms used, and the accessibility for patients. The integration of remote monitoring technologies, such as wearable devices that track vital signs, could further enhance the quality of care.
Mental health resources are an integral component of comprehensive lung cancer care. A diagnosis of lung cancer can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. The availability of mental health support services, such as counseling, support groups, and psychiatric care, is crucial. We need to assess the availability of these resources within 30360, including the number of mental health professionals, the types of services offered, and the accessibility for patients. The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan is essential for improving patient outcomes.
Primary care availability in Atlanta, beyond the confines of 30360, significantly influences the overall lung cancer care landscape. Adequate primary care access is critical for early detection and prevention. PCPs play a crucial role in identifying individuals at high risk for lung cancer, such as current and former smokers, and referring them for screening. Analyzing primary care physician density throughout Atlanta, along with the availability of preventative services, provides a broader perspective. This includes assessing the number of PCPs per capita, the geographic distribution of these physicians, and the availability of smoking cessation programs.
Evaluating the accessibility of primary care involves considering factors such as insurance coverage, appointment availability, and the presence of language barriers. Disparities in access to care can lead to delayed diagnoses and poorer outcomes for certain populations. We must examine the impact of socioeconomic factors on access to care, focusing on underserved communities within Atlanta. This involves analyzing data on insurance coverage rates, income levels, and the availability of transportation to medical appointments.
The Lung Cancer Score for 30360 and Atlanta must also consider the role of community resources. This includes the presence of support groups, patient advocacy organizations, and educational programs. These resources can provide patients with valuable information, emotional support, and practical assistance. We need to identify the community resources available within 30360 and the broader Atlanta area, assessing their accessibility and the services they offer.
In conclusion, the Lung Cancer Score for 30360 and Atlanta is a dynamic measure, reflecting the complex interplay of physician access, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and community support. By systematically analyzing these factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local lung cancer care landscape. This analysis is crucial for identifying areas for improvement and ensuring that all patients have access to the best possible care.
For a visual representation of physician distribution, screening rates, and community resource locations, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like