The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 30710, Cohutta, Georgia is 35 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.09 percent of the residents in 30710 has some form of health insurance. 31.23 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.90 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30710 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,725 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30710. An estimate of 6 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,005 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,462 health care providers accessible to residents in 30710, Cohutta, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30710, Cohutta, Georgia
Lung Cancer Score | 35 |
---|---|
People Score | 52 |
Provider Score | 35 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 50 |
30710 | Cohutta | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical "Lung Cancer Score" assessment for physicians in ZIP Code 30710, focusing on primary care availability in Cohutta, Georgia. This score is constructed using several factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources. It's crucial to remember that this is a hypothetical exercise and should not be used for actual medical decisions. Real-world assessments require significantly more data and expertise.
Cohutta, a small community nestled in the North Georgia mountains, presents unique challenges and opportunities regarding healthcare access. The rural nature of the area often translates to limited resources and a greater reliance on primary care physicians (PCPs). A robust primary care system is crucial for early lung cancer detection and management, as PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratios:**
A critical element of the Lung Cancer Score is the physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP Code 30710. A higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access to care. Publicly available data from sources like the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) can be used to estimate this ratio. However, this data often lags and might not reflect real-time changes in physician availability. For this analysis, we’ll assume a hypothetical ratio.
Let's assume a hypothetical scenario. We'll posit that the physician-to-patient ratio in Cohutta is less favorable than the national average, perhaps 1:2000, compared to a national average of 1:1500. This suggests a potential shortage of PCPs, which could lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and delayed diagnoses. This would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score.
**Standout Practices:**
The Lung Cancer Score also considers the characteristics of primary care practices within the ZIP code. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to early detection, screening, and patient education would receive higher scores. This could include practices that:
* **Offer comprehensive lung cancer screening:** This means actively promoting and facilitating low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for eligible patients (those with a history of smoking and other risk factors).
* **Emphasize smoking cessation programs:** Providing resources and support to help patients quit smoking is vital for preventing lung cancer.
* **Utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively:** EHRs facilitate efficient tracking of patient data, including risk factors, screening results, and treatment plans.
* **Have established referral pathways to specialists:** Prompt referrals to pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists are crucial for patients with suspected or confirmed lung cancer.
Hypothetically, a practice in Cohutta, "Mountain View Primary Care," might stand out. They could be recognized for their proactive approach to lung cancer screening, offering on-site LDCT scans, and having a dedicated smoking cessation counselor. This would significantly boost their Lung Cancer Score.
**Telemedicine Adoption:**
Telemedicine has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. It enhances access to care by allowing patients to consult with physicians remotely. The Lung Cancer Score considers the extent to which practices in ZIP Code 30710 have adopted telemedicine.
Practices that offer telehealth appointments for follow-up visits, medication management, and even initial consultations would receive higher scores. This is especially beneficial for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments due to distance, mobility issues, or other factors.
In our hypothetical scenario, "Cohutta Family Medicine" might be praised for its robust telemedicine platform, allowing patients to schedule virtual appointments easily and receive care from the comfort of their homes. This would positively influence their Lung Cancer Score.
**Mental Health Resources:**
The emotional toll of a lung cancer diagnosis is significant. The Lung Cancer Score includes an assessment of the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referrals.
Practices that:
* **Screen for depression and anxiety:** Early identification of mental health issues is crucial.
* **Offer on-site counseling services:** Providing access to mental health professionals within the practice can improve patient outcomes.
* **Have established referral pathways to mental health specialists:** Ensuring patients can access specialized care when needed is essential.
In our hypothetical analysis, "Cohutta Health Center" might be recognized for its strong collaboration with local mental health providers, offering easy referrals and integrated care for patients struggling with the emotional challenges of lung cancer. This would be a positive factor in their Lung Cancer Score.
**The Hypothetical Lung Cancer Score:**
The Lung Cancer Score is a composite of all the factors mentioned above. Each practice within ZIP Code 30710 would receive a score based on its performance in each category.
For example, Mountain View Primary Care, with its focus on screening and smoking cessation, might receive a high score for early detection. Cohutta Family Medicine, with its telemedicine platform, would excel in access to care. Cohutta Health Center, with its mental health resources, would receive a high score for patient support.
The overall Lung Cancer Score for the ZIP code would reflect the average performance of all practices. A higher score would indicate better access to care, a greater emphasis on early detection and prevention, and more comprehensive support for patients.
**Conclusion:**
This hypothetical analysis demonstrates the factors that contribute to a strong Lung Cancer Score in a rural setting like Cohutta. By focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, we can assess the quality of care available to patients at risk of or diagnosed with lung cancer.
This analysis is a simplified illustration. A real-world assessment would require more comprehensive data and a deeper understanding of the local healthcare landscape.
**Call to Action:**
Want to visualize the healthcare landscape in Cohutta and beyond? Explore the power of spatial analysis and healthcare data with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive mapping solutions that can help you identify areas with limited access to care, visualize physician distribution, and understand the impact of social determinants of health. Contact CartoChrome today to learn how to leverage the power of maps for better healthcare insights.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like