Health Scores Near 40075, Turners Station, Kentucky
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 40075, Turners Station, Kentucky is 20 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.80 percent of the residents in 40075 has some form of health insurance. 47.68 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.27 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 40075 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 160 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 40075. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 187 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 365 health care providers accessible to residents in 40075, Turners Station, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 40075, Turners Station, Kentucky
| Lung Cancer Score | 49 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 79 |
| Provider Score | 20 |
| Hospital Score | 56 |
| Travel Score | 36 |
| 40075 | Turners Station | Kentucky | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score assessment for medical resources within ZIP Code 40075, focusing on primary care availability in Turners Station, Kentucky. The score is a hypothetical construct, considering factors relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and patient support. The assessment considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, aiming to offer a comprehensive perspective.
The foundation of a good Lung Cancer Score lies in the accessibility of primary care. Turners Station, as a component of ZIP Code 40075, likely has a limited number of primary care physicians (PCPs). A low PCP-to-patient ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing timely preventative care, including lung cancer screenings. This scarcity can lead to delayed diagnoses and, consequently, poorer patient outcomes. The score will be negatively impacted by this limited availability.
Analyzing specific practices within the area is crucial. Are there any standout practices that prioritize preventative care, including promoting lung cancer screenings for high-risk individuals (smokers, former smokers, and those with a family history)? Do these practices have dedicated staff focused on patient education and support? The presence of such practices would positively influence the score. Conversely, practices that do not actively promote screening or provide patient navigation services would detract from the overall assessment.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor. Does the area's primary care infrastructure embrace telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring? Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The ability to consult with specialists remotely, potentially including pulmonologists or oncologists, can also expedite diagnosis and treatment planning. Practices with robust telemedicine capabilities would enhance the score, while those with limited or no telemedicine options would lower it.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical in lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and access to mental health support is essential for patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans. Does the area have readily available mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists? Are these resources integrated into primary care practices or readily accessible through referrals? The presence of strong mental health support services would significantly boost the score. Conversely, the lack of such resources would have a negative impact.
The availability of lung cancer screening programs, specifically low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans, is also critical. Are there facilities within the ZIP Code that offer LDCT screenings? Are these screenings readily accessible, and are they covered by insurance? The presence of screening programs, coupled with a proactive approach to identifying and referring high-risk individuals, would positively affect the score. Limited access to screening programs would negatively influence the assessment.
Considering the factors, the Lung Cancer Score for the area is likely to be moderate. The limited number of PCPs in Turners Station and the broader ZIP Code area presents a significant challenge. While specific practice details are unknown, the rural nature of the area may limit access to advanced diagnostic and treatment options. The degree of telemedicine adoption and the availability of mental health resources will be crucial determinants of the score. The presence of lung cancer screening programs would be a significant positive factor, but their accessibility and integration with primary care are essential.
To improve the Lung Cancer Score, several steps are needed. Increasing the number of PCPs in the area is paramount. Encouraging existing practices to adopt telemedicine and integrate mental health services is also crucial. Promoting lung cancer screening programs and educating the public about the importance of early detection are essential. Finally, fostering collaboration between primary care physicians, specialists, and mental health professionals can create a more comprehensive and supportive healthcare system for patients.
The analysis highlights the complexities of assessing healthcare resources in a specific geographic area. The Lung Cancer Score is a hypothetical construct, but it underscores the importance of considering multiple factors when evaluating healthcare access and quality. The specific details of each practice, the level of telemedicine adoption, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of screening programs are critical determinants of the score.
The overall assessment suggests that while the area may have basic healthcare services, it likely faces challenges in providing comprehensive lung cancer care. The limited number of PCPs, the potential for limited access to specialists, and the potential lack of robust mental health support services could negatively impact patient outcomes. Addressing these challenges through increased access to primary care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration is crucial.
The analysis also emphasizes the importance of proactive preventative care. Encouraging lung cancer screenings for high-risk individuals and promoting patient education are essential steps in improving the score. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and patients is also crucial for creating a more supportive healthcare system.
The hypothetical Lung Cancer Score is a starting point for a more detailed analysis. Further research, including site visits, interviews with healthcare providers, and data analysis, would be necessary to provide a more accurate and comprehensive assessment. However, this initial analysis provides a valuable overview of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 40075, highlighting the challenges and opportunities for improving lung cancer care.
To gain a more visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 40075 and surrounding areas, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a geospatial representation of healthcare resources, including physician locations, hospital locations, and other relevant data. This visual approach can help you identify areas with limited access to care and understand the geographic distribution of healthcare resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
