Health Scores Near 40117, Ekron, Kentucky
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 40117, Ekron, Kentucky is 9 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.79 percent of the residents in 40117 has some form of health insurance. 43.16 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.41 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 40117 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 647 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 40117. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 448 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 569 health care providers accessible to residents in 40117, Ekron, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 40117, Ekron, Kentucky
| Lung Cancer Score | 13 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 53 |
| Provider Score | 9 |
| Hospital Score | 42 |
| Travel Score | 24 |
| 40117 | Ekron | Kentucky | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Ekron, Kentucky (ZIP Code 40117)
This analysis focuses on the availability and quality of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer detection and treatment within ZIP code 40117, specifically examining primary care physician (PCP) access and physician practices. The goal is to provide a “Lung Cancer Score” assessment, factoring in elements like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health support, which are crucial components of a comprehensive approach to lung cancer care. The analysis is geographically constrained to Ekron, Kentucky, and its immediate surrounding areas.
Ekron, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare access. The limited population base often translates to a smaller pool of available healthcare providers. This scarcity necessitates a careful examination of resource allocation and the efficiency of healthcare delivery.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratios and Primary Care Availability:**
A fundamental aspect of lung cancer care is the accessibility of primary care physicians. Early detection through regular screenings and prompt referral to specialists are vital for improved outcomes. The physician-to-patient ratio in Ekron and the surrounding areas is a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and diagnoses. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards should be consulted to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio. This data will be crucial in determining the Lung Cancer Score.
The availability of primary care is not simply about the number of physicians; it also encompasses the types of services offered. Do the available PCPs provide comprehensive care, including preventative screenings like those recommended for lung cancer (e.g., low-dose computed tomography or LDCT scans for high-risk individuals)? Do they have established referral pathways to pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists? These factors significantly impact the overall quality of care.
**Standout Practices and Their Impact:**
Identifying standout practices within the region is essential. These practices often demonstrate excellence in specific areas, such as patient communication, advanced diagnostic capabilities, or a commitment to patient education. The presence of such practices can significantly elevate the Lung Cancer Score.
A standout practice might be characterized by its proactive approach to lung cancer screening, its adoption of innovative technologies like electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate seamless information sharing, or its patient-centered care model. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials or research related to lung cancer treatment also contribute positively to the score. Information on practices can be found through online reviews, professional organizations, and patient advocacy groups.
**Telemedicine Adoption and Accessibility:**
Telemedicine has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas where access to specialists can be limited. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care physicians in Ekron and the surrounding areas is a significant factor in the Lung Cancer Score. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with specialists remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially expediting access to diagnostic and treatment services.
The availability of telehealth consultations for pulmonology, oncology, and mental health services is particularly relevant. Practices that offer telemedicine options, especially for follow-up appointments and consultations, receive a higher score. The quality of the telemedicine platform, including ease of use and technical support, also influences the assessment.
**Mental Health Resources and Support:**
Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. The availability of mental health resources is therefore a critical component of comprehensive care. The Lung Cancer Score must reflect the availability of these resources.
This includes access to mental health professionals such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists. Are these professionals readily available to patients in the Ekron area? Do primary care practices have established referral pathways to mental health services? Are support groups available for lung cancer patients and their families? The presence of these resources, and their integration into the overall care plan, significantly improves the score.
**Specifics for the Score:**
The "Lung Cancer Score" would be a composite measure, taking into account the various factors discussed above. A detailed breakdown of the scoring criteria would be necessary. For example:
* **Physician-to-Patient Ratio:** A lower ratio (more physicians per capita) would receive a higher score.
* **Primary Care Screening Practices:** Practices offering LDCT screenings and other preventative measures would score higher.
* **Telemedicine Adoption:** Practices actively utilizing telemedicine for specialist consultations would receive a significant boost.
* **Mental Health Resources:** The availability and accessibility of mental health services would be a key factor.
* **Standout Practice Recognition:** Practices recognized for excellence would receive a premium.
The final score would reflect the overall quality and accessibility of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer care within ZIP code 40117.
**Conclusion:**
Assessing the healthcare landscape in Ekron, Kentucky, reveals the need for a careful examination of resources. The Lung Cancer Score provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the existing healthcare infrastructure. This analysis highlights the importance of physician access, preventative screenings, telemedicine, and mental health support in providing comprehensive care.
To further explore the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and other relevant data points, we encourage you to use CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, aiding in the identification of areas with limited access and opportunities for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
