40161, Rhodelia, Kentucky Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 40161, Rhodelia, Kentucky is 13 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 40161 has some form of health insurance. 48.55 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.32 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 40161 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 33 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 40161. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 24 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 235 health care providers accessible to residents in 40161, Rhodelia, Kentucky.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Rhodelia, KY (ZIP Code 40161)

Analyzing the availability of lung cancer care and related resources in Rhodelia, Kentucky (ZIP code 40161) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis assesses the landscape of primary care physicians, specialists, and support services, ultimately producing a "Lung Cancer Score" reflecting the overall accessibility and quality of care. The score considers factors beyond simple physician counts, including physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of modern technologies like telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, which is crucial for patients navigating a lung cancer diagnosis.

Rhodelia, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities. The rural nature of the area often translates to a lower density of healthcare providers compared to urban centers. This immediately impacts the physician-to-patient ratio. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative screenings, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Accurate data on the exact physician-to-patient ratio within the 40161 ZIP code is essential for a baseline understanding. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, combined with information from local hospitals and clinics, would provide the most accurate picture.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within Rhodelia is critical. These practices might excel in early detection, employing advanced screening techniques such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for high-risk individuals. They might have established robust referral networks, ensuring seamless transitions for patients needing specialized care from pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. Researching the patient outcomes, patient satisfaction scores, and the use of evidence-based treatment protocols within each practice would be vital for a comprehensive evaluation.

The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor. Telemedicine offers a potential solution to the geographic limitations inherent in rural healthcare. Virtual consultations with specialists, remote monitoring of patients' conditions, and access to educational resources can all be facilitated through telemedicine. Assessing the extent to which practices in Rhodelia utilize telemedicine platforms, and the types of services they offer remotely, would directly influence the "Lung Cancer Score." Does telemedicine bridge the gap to specialists? Are follow-up appointments accessible via telehealth? These are important questions.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critically important for lung cancer patients. A diagnosis of lung cancer can be devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, who specialize in oncology, is a key indicator of a supportive healthcare environment. The analysis must investigate the presence of mental health services within the primary care practices, the existence of partnerships with local mental health providers, and the availability of support groups specifically for cancer patients.

Further, the analysis must consider the existence of support programs like smoking cessation programs. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer. The availability of these programs, and their effectiveness, can significantly impact the community's overall lung cancer burden. The analysis should evaluate the accessibility of these programs, their cost, and their success rates.

The "Lung Cancer Score" will be a composite metric, reflecting the weighted impact of each of these factors. The weighting will be based on the relative importance of each factor in contributing to the overall quality of care and the accessibility of resources. For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio might negatively impact the score, while the widespread adoption of telemedicine could positively influence it. The availability of specialized mental health support could also significantly boost the score.

The research process would involve several steps. First, gather publicly available data on physician counts and specialties within the 40161 ZIP code. Second, conduct interviews with local healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, specialists, and hospital administrators. Third, review patient satisfaction surveys and outcome data where available. Fourth, research the availability of mental health services and support groups. Finally, analyze the adoption of telemedicine and other innovative technologies.

The final "Lung Cancer Score" will be presented as a numerical value, accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology and the rationale behind the scoring. This score will provide a valuable benchmark for the community, highlighting areas of strength and areas where improvements are needed. It will also serve as a tool for patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare.

The process also needs to consider the socioeconomic factors of the population. Are there financial barriers to care? Are there transportation challenges? The analysis should also investigate the presence of community health initiatives aimed at reducing lung cancer risk, such as public awareness campaigns and educational programs.

The analysis must consider the hospital infrastructure in the area. The presence of a hospital with a dedicated oncology department, including access to radiation therapy and chemotherapy, is a significant positive factor. The quality of the hospital's cancer care program, as measured by metrics like survival rates and patient satisfaction, will also influence the score.

This comprehensive approach will provide a nuanced understanding of the lung cancer care landscape in Rhodelia, KY. It will empower the community to advocate for improvements and ensure that residents have access to the best possible care.

**Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Rhodelia and beyond? Explore the power of spatial data with CartoChrome maps. See the data in a new light and gain valuable insights into healthcare access and resource distribution. Contact us today to learn more!**