The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 40442, Kings Mountain, Kentucky is 46 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.79 percent of the residents in 40442 has some form of health insurance. 34.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 40442 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 105 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 40442. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 117 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,612 health care providers accessible to residents in 40442, Kings Mountain, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 40442, Kings Mountain, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score | 16 |
---|---|
People Score | 20 |
Provider Score | 46 |
Hospital Score | 31 |
Travel Score | 40 |
40442 | Kings Mountain | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below focuses on lung cancer care within the context of primary care availability for the residents of Kings Mountain, Kentucky, specifically within the 40442 ZIP code. This requires a multifaceted approach, examining the availability of primary care physicians, the quality of that care, and the resources available for lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. We will also explore the adoption of telemedicine and the availability of mental health support, all crucial factors in a patient's overall well-being and care journey.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care begins with robust primary care. In Kings Mountain, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors relative to the population, can lead to delayed appointments, less time spent with each patient, and potentially, missed opportunities for early detection. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access to care. Determining the precise ratio for 40442 requires accessing publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure. This data will provide a baseline understanding of the community's access to primary care.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This involves assessing the practices within the 40442 ZIP code for their adherence to evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening. This includes the use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for individuals at high risk (smokers or former smokers with a significant smoking history). Practices should also have established protocols for referring patients with suspicious findings to pulmonologists or oncologists for further evaluation. The presence of electronic health records (EHRs) and their interoperability are also important. EHRs facilitate better communication between primary care physicians and specialists, ensuring a seamless flow of information and a coordinated approach to patient care.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. This involves looking at patient satisfaction surveys, physician reviews, and the practice's commitment to preventive care. Practices that actively promote smoking cessation programs, offer convenient appointment scheduling, and provide clear and accessible patient education materials are likely to be more effective in managing lung cancer risk and providing comprehensive care. The availability of on-site diagnostic services, such as X-rays or basic lab work, can also improve patient convenience and reduce delays in diagnosis.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients in rural areas like Kings Mountain to access specialists and receive follow-up care remotely. This is particularly important for lung cancer patients who may need frequent monitoring or consultations. The availability of telemedicine platforms, the willingness of physicians to utilize them, and the patient's access to technology (internet connectivity and devices) are all factors that influence the effectiveness of telemedicine in this context.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical for lung cancer patients. A diagnosis of lung cancer can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, within the community is essential. Ideally, these resources should be integrated into the primary care setting or readily accessible through referral networks. Support groups, both in-person and online, can also provide invaluable emotional support and a sense of community for patients and their families.
Assessing the availability of specialists is also important. This includes pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, and radiation oncologists. The proximity of these specialists to Kings Mountain, the ease of referral from primary care physicians, and the waiting times for appointments all contribute to the overall quality of care. A shortage of specialists can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment, which can negatively impact patient outcomes.
The overall "Lung Cancer Score" for doctors in the 40442 ZIP code would be a composite score, reflecting all of the factors discussed above. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the access to specialists. This score would need to be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as the arrival of new physicians, the implementation of new technologies, or the expansion of mental health services.
To build a comprehensive picture, data from various sources would need to be integrated. Publicly available data from government agencies, insurance providers, and professional organizations would be used. Patient surveys, physician reviews, and practice websites would also provide valuable insights. This integrated data analysis would allow for a more nuanced and accurate assessment of the lung cancer care landscape in Kings Mountain.
The final "Lung Cancer Score" would be a dynamic measure, reflecting the ongoing efforts of healthcare providers to improve patient care. It would serve as a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike. It would help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare, guide healthcare providers in identifying areas for improvement, and inform policymakers about the need for additional resources or interventions.
The challenges of providing high-quality lung cancer care in a rural area like Kings Mountain are significant. However, by focusing on primary care availability, promoting early detection, expanding access to specialists, integrating mental health services, and embracing telemedicine, the community can improve the outcomes for individuals affected by this disease.
To visualize and better understand the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including the location of physicians, specialists, and mental health providers, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, helping you identify areas of strength and weakness and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like