Lung Cancer Score

41092, Verona, Kentucky Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 41092, Verona, Kentucky

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 41092, Verona, Kentucky is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.72 percent of the residents in 41092 has some form of health insurance. 36.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.98 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41092 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 722 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 8 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41092. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 523 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,456 health care providers accessible to residents in 41092, Verona, Kentucky.

Health Scores in 41092, Verona, Kentucky

Lung Cancer Score 71
People Score 67
Provider Score 45
Hospital Score 60
Travel Score 50

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

41092 Verona Kentucky
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 41092, Verona, Kentucky

The following analysis examines the landscape of lung cancer care within the Verona, Kentucky (ZIP Code 41092) area, focusing on primary care physician (PCP) availability, physician-to-patient ratios, and the integration of modern healthcare practices. This assessment aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to patients facing a lung cancer diagnosis or seeking preventative care.

Verona, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. One of the primary concerns is the availability of PCPs. A robust primary care network is crucial for early detection of lung cancer, as these physicians are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. A limited number of PCPs can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, a shortage can strain existing healthcare providers, impacting the quality of care they can provide.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. The ideal ratio, which varies based on population demographics and healthcare needs, determines the workload each physician carries. A high patient-to-physician ratio can result in less time spent with each patient, potentially hindering thorough examinations and the development of personalized care plans. This is particularly problematic in lung cancer care, where early and accurate diagnosis is paramount. In Verona, determining the exact ratio requires a comprehensive assessment of the number of practicing PCPs and the total population. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, combined with local healthcare provider directories, can help establish this ratio.

Standout practices within the area should be identified. These practices often serve as models for quality care and innovation. They may have implemented advanced diagnostic tools, such as low-dose CT scans for lung cancer screening, or adopted patient-centered care models that prioritize communication and shared decision-making. They may also have established strong referral networks with specialists, including pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, ensuring seamless transitions of care. Identifying these practices requires a deep dive into local healthcare provider websites, patient reviews, and potentially, interviews with healthcare professionals.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, reducing the need for travel and expanding access to specialists. In the context of lung cancer care, telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring of patients' conditions. The degree of telemedicine adoption within Verona's primary care practices is a key indicator of accessibility. This assessment should investigate the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring tools, and the use of telemedicine platforms for specialist consultations.

Mental health resources are also crucial. A lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being. Access to mental health services, including counseling and support groups, is essential for managing anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. The analysis should assess the availability of mental health professionals within the area, the integration of mental health services into primary care practices, and the existence of local support groups for cancer patients.

The availability of lung cancer screening programs is another critical factor. Early detection through screening, particularly for high-risk individuals (e.g., smokers and former smokers), can significantly improve survival rates. The analysis should investigate whether local primary care practices offer lung cancer screening programs, and if so, what criteria they use for patient eligibility. Furthermore, it should assess the availability of imaging facilities equipped to perform low-dose CT scans, which are the standard for lung cancer screening.

The role of community resources should not be overlooked. Local organizations, such as cancer support groups and patient advocacy groups, can provide valuable support and information to patients and their families. The analysis should identify these resources and assess their accessibility and effectiveness. Information about support groups, educational materials, and financial assistance programs can empower patients to navigate their treatment journey.

Data collection for this analysis requires a multi-faceted approach. Publicly available data from government agencies, healthcare provider directories, and patient reviews can provide valuable insights. Direct contact with local primary care practices through surveys or interviews can yield more detailed information about their services and practices. Reviewing local hospital websites and community health resources can also contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape.

The overall 'Lung Cancer Score' for the area will be based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above. The weighting of each factor should reflect its relative importance in providing quality lung cancer care. For example, physician-to-patient ratios and the availability of lung cancer screening programs may be weighted more heavily than the availability of support groups. The final score should provide a clear and concise assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in Verona, Kentucky, in relation to lung cancer care.

The assessment should also consider any potential disparities in access to care. Factors such as socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity can impact a patient's ability to access healthcare services. The analysis should identify any potential barriers to care and suggest strategies for addressing them. This could include advocating for increased access to transportation, providing financial assistance to patients, or implementing culturally sensitive healthcare practices.

The findings of this analysis can be used to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Patients can use the information to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Healthcare providers can use the analysis to identify areas for improvement and to benchmark their performance against other practices. Policymakers can use the information to develop strategies for improving access to care and to address healthcare disparities.

Ultimately, the goal of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare landscape in Verona, Kentucky, in relation to lung cancer care. By identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, this analysis can help to improve the quality of care and to ensure that all patients have access to the resources they need to fight lung cancer.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Verona, Kentucky, including the location of primary care practices, specialists, and healthcare resources, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 41092, Verona, Kentucky

You may also like

41046, Glencoe, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 6.02 Miles

Total Population:

41094, Walton, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 7.00 Miles

Total Population:

41091, Union, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 8.37 Miles

Total Population:

41095, Warsaw, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 10.11 Miles

Total Population:

41063, Morning View, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 10.77 Miles

Total Population:

41051, Independence, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 11.21 Miles

Total Population:

41052, Jonesville, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 11.89 Miles

Total Population:

41042, Florence, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 11.93 Miles

Total Population:

41086, Sparta, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 41092: 12.96 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 41092, Verona, Kentucky