41159, Martha, Kentucky Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 41159, Martha, Kentucky is 30 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.56 percent of the residents in 41159 has some form of health insurance. 86.05 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 17.21 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41159 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 178 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41159. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 65 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 86 health care providers accessible to residents in 41159, Martha, Kentucky.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Martha, Kentucky - Physicians and Resources

Analyzing the landscape of healthcare resources in and around Martha, Kentucky (ZIP Code 41159), requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on factors crucial for lung cancer care, including physician availability, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health support. We will assess these elements to generate a hypothetical “Lung Cancer Score,” offering insights into the accessibility and quality of care available to residents.

The foundation of any strong healthcare system is the availability of qualified physicians. In Martha, the physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for primary care physicians (PCPs), is a critical factor. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, can lead to delayed diagnoses, reduced access to preventative care, and challenges in navigating the complex process of lung cancer treatment. Data from various sources, including the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards, would be essential to determine the exact ratio within ZIP Code 41159 and the surrounding area. We must consider the population density of Martha, the geographic distribution of physicians, and the potential for patients to seek care outside of their immediate community.

Beyond the raw numbers, the specialization of physicians within the area is important. While PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients exhibiting symptoms, the presence of pulmonologists (lung specialists), oncologists (cancer specialists), and thoracic surgeons is vital for comprehensive lung cancer care. These specialists are crucial for accurate diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning. The lack of these specialists would necessitate travel to larger cities, adding to the burden on patients and potentially delaying care.

Identifying “standout practices” involves evaluating the quality of care provided by existing medical facilities. This assessment requires examining several factors. Accreditation status from organizations like the Commission on Cancer (CoC) is a key indicator of quality. Facilities with CoC accreditation adhere to rigorous standards for cancer care, including multidisciplinary treatment planning, access to clinical trials, and comprehensive support services. Another factor is the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies, such as modern imaging equipment (CT scans, PET scans) and radiation therapy capabilities. Patient satisfaction scores, derived from surveys and online reviews, also provide valuable insights into the patient experience.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Martha. Telemedicine allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, overcoming geographical barriers and improving access to specialists. The availability of virtual consultations with pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists can significantly improve the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, telemedicine can facilitate remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment, providing support and early intervention when needed. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption in the area requires evaluating the availability of telehealth platforms, the willingness of physicians to participate, and the technological infrastructure available to patients.

Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment are emotionally challenging experiences. Therefore, access to mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive care. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, is essential for supporting patients and their families. These professionals can provide counseling, support groups, and other interventions to help patients cope with the psychological and emotional distress associated with cancer. Assessing the availability of mental health resources requires examining the number of mental health providers in the area, the types of services offered, and the accessibility of these services to patients with cancer.

Based on the factors discussed above, we can begin to formulate a hypothetical “Lung Cancer Score” for the area surrounding Martha, Kentucky. This score would be a composite measure, reflecting the availability and quality of care. The score would incorporate the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialists, the quality of standout practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. Each factor would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. For example, the presence of specialists and access to mental health services might be weighted more heavily than the availability of telemedicine.

To generate a meaningful score, it would be necessary to gather data from various sources. This includes public health data, medical directories, healthcare provider websites, and patient satisfaction surveys. The data would be analyzed to assess the performance of each factor, and the results would be combined to produce an overall score. The score could be presented on a scale, such as 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better access to and quality of lung cancer care. The score could also be broken down into sub-scores for each factor, providing a more detailed understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system.

The final “Lung Cancer Score” would serve as a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It would help patients to understand the level of care available in their community and to make informed decisions about their healthcare. It would also provide healthcare providers with insights into areas where they can improve their services. Furthermore, it would inform policymakers about the need for additional resources and interventions to improve lung cancer care in the area.

In conclusion, evaluating the healthcare landscape surrounding Martha, Kentucky, requires a comprehensive assessment of physician availability, specialist presence, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. By analyzing these factors, we can generate a meaningful “Lung Cancer Score” that reflects the accessibility and quality of care available to residents.

**Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Martha, Kentucky, and beyond? Explore the power of data-driven mapping with CartoChrome. Gain a deeper understanding of physician distribution, resource availability, and patient access. Visit CartoChrome today to unlock the insights you need!**