The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 42151, Hestand, Kentucky is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 42151 has some form of health insurance. 15.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42151 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 24 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42151. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 24 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 175 health care providers accessible to residents in 42151, Hestand, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 42151, Hestand, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score | 48 |
---|---|
People Score | 59 |
Provider Score | 36 |
Hospital Score | 45 |
Travel Score | 50 |
42151 | Hestand | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 42151 & Hestand Primary Care
This analysis evaluates the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 42151, specifically focusing on primary care availability in the nearby community of Hestand, Kentucky, with a lens towards factors crucial for lung cancer detection, treatment, and overall patient well-being. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available and identify areas for potential improvement. This is not a definitive ranking, but rather an assessment of the current situation based on available data and general healthcare trends.
The foundation of any effective lung cancer care pathway rests on accessible and high-quality primary care. Early detection is paramount, and primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact. Their ability to identify risk factors, order appropriate screenings, and refer patients to specialists significantly impacts outcomes. In Hestand, the availability of PCPs is a critical factor. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial first step. Data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) can provide insights into the number of PCPs serving the area, compared to the population size. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses.
Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care is essential. Evaluating the practices within and near Hestand involves considering factors like board certifications, experience levels, and patient satisfaction scores. Websites like Healthgrades and Vitals, along with state medical board records, can provide valuable information on physician qualifications and patient reviews. Identifying standout practices, those with a demonstrable commitment to preventative care and patient-centered approaches, is crucial. These practices often have established protocols for lung cancer screening, including utilizing guidelines from organizations like the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for recommending low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals.
Telemedicine adoption is another key consideration. Telemedicine offers the potential to expand access to care, particularly in rural areas like Hestand, where geographical barriers can limit access to specialists and follow-up appointments. The availability of telehealth consultations for primary care, specialist referrals, and even mental health support can significantly improve patient convenience and adherence to treatment plans. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within local practices, including the types of services offered and the ease of use for patients, is essential.
The emotional and psychological impact of a lung cancer diagnosis is profound. Mental health resources are therefore a critical component of comprehensive care. Patients often experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges throughout their treatment journey. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the community is therefore essential. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services within primary care practices, such as on-site counseling or readily available referral pathways, can greatly improve access to support. Assessing the availability of these resources, including the types of services offered, wait times, and insurance coverage, is critical.
Further analysis should consider the availability of specialized lung cancer care within a reasonable distance of Hestand. This includes access to pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists. The proximity of cancer centers, the availability of advanced diagnostic tools like PET scans, and the presence of clinical trials are all factors that influence the quality of care. The presence of multidisciplinary teams, bringing together specialists from various fields to collaborate on patient care, is a hallmark of high-quality cancer centers.
The financial burden of cancer treatment can be significant. Understanding the availability of financial assistance programs, patient navigators, and support groups is also crucial. Patient navigators can help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, connect them with resources, and provide emotional support. Support groups offer a valuable opportunity for patients to connect with others who are facing similar challenges.
Data collection and analysis for this type of assessment can be challenging. Information on physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources may not always be readily available in a centralized format. Data from public health agencies, insurance providers, and professional organizations can be used to piece together a comprehensive picture. Patient surveys and interviews can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and identify areas for improvement.
Ultimately, the “Lung Cancer Score” for this area would be a composite measure, incorporating these various factors. It would reflect the overall accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of care available to patients at risk of or diagnosed with lung cancer. The score would not be a static number, but rather a dynamic assessment that changes over time as healthcare resources evolve. The goal is to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within the local healthcare system.
The development of such a score requires a robust data-driven approach. This includes gathering information from various sources, analyzing the data, and interpreting the results. The findings can then be used to inform decision-making, guide resource allocation, and advocate for improvements in healthcare delivery. The focus should always be on improving the lives of patients and ensuring that they have access to the best possible care.
If you're interested in visualizing and analyzing the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 42151 and surrounding areas, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and demographic data, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides powerful mapping and data visualization tools to help you gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like