42159, Oakland, Kentucky Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 42159, Oakland, Kentucky is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.02 percent of the residents in 42159 has some form of health insurance. 26.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42159 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 232 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42159. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 264 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,561 health care providers accessible to residents in 42159, Oakland, Kentucky.

This analysis will provide a hypothetical Lung Cancer Score (LCS) for doctors in ZIP code 42159 and primary care availability in Oakland, California. Due to the nature of the request, this is a conceptual exercise, as real-time, granular data on all the specified factors is not readily available. The goal is to illustrate how such a scoring system could be constructed, considering relevant factors and their potential impact on patient outcomes, especially concerning lung cancer.

**Lung Cancer Score (LCS) Framework**

The LCS would be a composite score, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of lung cancer-related care within a defined geographical area. This score would incorporate various components, each weighted based on its perceived importance in influencing patient outcomes. The components would include:

* **Early Detection & Screening:** Availability and utilization of low-dose CT scans (LDCT) for high-risk individuals.
* **Physician Expertise:** Number of pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons per capita, as well as their experience and specialization.
* **Treatment Options:** Availability of advanced therapies like targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and radiation therapy.
* **Support Services:** Access to smoking cessation programs, mental health support, palliative care, and financial assistance.
* **Accessibility:** Factors such as insurance acceptance, wait times, and transportation options.

**ZIP Code 42159 (Hypothetical Analysis)**

ZIP code 42159 is a hypothetical rural location. We will assume a limited population and healthcare infrastructure.

**Early Detection & Screening:** The LCS for early detection in 42159 would likely be low. The availability of LDCT scanners in the immediate area is presumed to be limited, potentially requiring patients to travel significant distances for screening. Awareness campaigns about the importance of screening for high-risk individuals (smokers, former smokers) might be lacking.

**Physician Expertise:** Due to the rural nature, the physician-to-patient ratio for specialists like pulmonologists and oncologists would likely be unfavorable. Patients might need to travel to larger cities for specialized consultations and treatment. The presence of a general practitioner with a special interest in respiratory health could slightly improve the score, but the lack of specialists would be a significant detriment.

**Treatment Options:** Access to advanced treatment options would be a major challenge. The availability of cutting-edge therapies, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies, would likely be limited to larger hospitals outside the immediate ZIP code. Radiation therapy, requiring specialized equipment and expertise, would also be a significant hurdle.

**Support Services:** Support services, such as smoking cessation programs and mental health resources, might be scarce. Patients dealing with a lung cancer diagnosis often experience significant emotional distress, and the lack of accessible mental health support would negatively impact their overall well-being and treatment adherence. Palliative care, crucial for managing symptoms and improving quality of life, might also be limited.

**Accessibility:** Accessibility would be a major concern. Long travel distances to specialists, potential wait times for appointments, and limited public transportation options would create significant barriers to care. The acceptance of various insurance plans by local providers would also play a role in determining accessibility.

**Primary Care Availability in Oakland (Hypothetical Analysis)**

Oakland, a larger urban center, would likely receive a higher LCS compared to 42159.

**Early Detection & Screening:** Oakland would likely have better access to LDCT screening. Multiple hospitals and imaging centers would offer the service. Public health initiatives and community outreach programs might be in place to promote screening among high-risk populations.

**Physician Expertise:** Oakland would have a higher concentration of specialists, including pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. Physician-to-patient ratios would be more favorable, leading to easier access to expert consultations and care. The presence of teaching hospitals and research institutions could contribute to a higher level of expertise and access to clinical trials.

**Treatment Options:** Oakland would offer a wider range of treatment options. Major hospitals would have access to advanced therapies, including targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and state-of-the-art radiation therapy. Patients would have access to clinical trials, providing opportunities for innovative treatment approaches.

**Support Services:** Oakland would likely have a more robust network of support services. Smoking cessation programs, mental health resources, and palliative care services would be more readily available. Support groups for patients and their families would be more common. Financial assistance programs might also be available to help patients manage the costs of treatment.

**Accessibility:** Accessibility in Oakland would be generally better than in 42159, but challenges might still exist. While public transportation options would be more extensive, traffic congestion and the cost of healthcare could still pose barriers. Insurance coverage and the acceptance of different insurance plans by providers would be crucial factors.

**Standout Practices and Telemedicine Adoption**

In Oakland, some practices might stand out for their commitment to lung cancer care. These could include hospitals with comprehensive cancer centers, multidisciplinary teams, and a focus on patient-centered care. Telemedicine adoption could play a significant role in improving access to care, particularly for follow-up appointments, consultations, and mental health support. Practices that embrace telemedicine would likely receive a higher LCS.

**Mental Health Resources**

The availability of mental health resources is a critical component of the LCS. In Oakland, the presence of mental health professionals specializing in oncology, support groups, and counseling services would positively impact the score. Integration of mental health services into cancer care pathways would further enhance the LCS.

**Physician-to-Patient Ratios**

Physician-to-patient ratios are a key indicator of access to care. A higher ratio of specialists (pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons) per capita would contribute to a higher LCS. This ratio would be significantly better in Oakland compared to the hypothetical rural setting of 42159.

**Conclusion**

This hypothetical analysis highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to assessing lung cancer care. The LCS framework, incorporating factors like early detection, physician expertise, treatment options, support services, and accessibility, provides a valuable tool for evaluating healthcare systems and identifying areas for improvement. It underscores the disparities in care that can exist between urban and rural settings.

**Take Action: Explore Healthcare Landscapes with CartoChrome Maps**

Want to visualize healthcare access and identify areas with the greatest need? Explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can help you create interactive maps that display physician density, access to specialists, and the availability of support services, providing a clear picture of healthcare landscapes. Visit CartoChrome today to learn more and start mapping the future of healthcare.