The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 42367, Powderly, Kentucky is 57 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.26 percent of the residents in 42367 has some form of health insurance. 68.65 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.27 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42367 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 216 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42367. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 218 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 638 health care providers accessible to residents in 42367, Powderly, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 42367, Powderly, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score | 76 |
---|---|
People Score | 73 |
Provider Score | 57 |
Hospital Score | 55 |
Travel Score | 45 |
42367 | Powderly | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on lung cancer care within ZIP code 42367, Powderly, Kentucky, evaluating primary care accessibility and related factors. A comprehensive "Lung Cancer Score" is developed, providing a nuanced perspective on the healthcare landscape. This score considers various elements, from physician availability to mental health support, crucial for effective cancer treatment.
The foundation of the Lung Cancer Score hinges on primary care physician (PCP) availability. Powderly, like many rural areas, often faces challenges in PCP access. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per patient, can lead to delayed diagnoses and treatment. Publicly available data, such as that from the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and the US Census Bureau, is examined to estimate this ratio within 42367. This data is cross-referenced with information on population density to determine potential accessibility challenges.
Standout practices are identified through a multi-faceted approach. Patient reviews, available through online platforms like Healthgrades and Vitals, provide insights into patient experiences. The quality of care is assessed by looking at the practices' accreditations, such as those from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Practices demonstrating a commitment to preventative care, including lung cancer screening, are given higher consideration. Furthermore, the availability of specialized services, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, within a reasonable distance is factored in.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant aspect of the score. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, enabling patients in rural areas to access specialist consultations and follow-up care. Practices that offer telehealth services, especially for oncology and pulmonary care, are ranked higher. The availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and online patient portals are all evaluated. The ease of use and integration of telemedicine platforms are also considered.
Mental health resources are an integral component of the Lung Cancer Score. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, within the primary care setting or through referral networks is assessed. The presence of support groups, both in-person and online, is also considered. Practices that actively screen for mental health issues and provide resources for patients receive higher scores.
The Lung Cancer Score is not a static number but a dynamic assessment reflecting the evolving healthcare landscape. It considers the accessibility of care, the quality of services, and the availability of supportive resources. The score is calculated using a weighted system, assigning points to each factor. The physician-to-patient ratio, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources are all assigned weights reflecting their relative importance. The final score provides a comprehensive overview of the healthcare environment for lung cancer patients in 42367.
The analysis considers the specific challenges faced by patients in Powderly. Rural communities often have limited access to specialized care and transportation difficulties. The Lung Cancer Score takes these factors into account, giving greater weight to practices that offer comprehensive services and support. The analysis considers the availability of transportation assistance programs, patient navigation services, and financial assistance programs.
The analysis goes beyond simple metrics, incorporating a qualitative assessment of the healthcare environment. This includes evaluating the responsiveness of practices to patient needs, the level of communication between providers, and the overall patient experience. The analysis considers the availability of patient education materials, the cultural sensitivity of providers, and the practices' commitment to patient-centered care.
The Lung Cancer Score is designed to be a practical tool for both patients and healthcare providers. Patients can use the score to identify practices that best meet their needs. Healthcare providers can use the score to benchmark their performance and identify areas for improvement. The analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in 42367.
The score incorporates data on lung cancer screening rates, which is a critical factor in early detection and improved outcomes. Practices that actively promote and provide lung cancer screening are ranked higher. The analysis considers the availability of low-dose CT scans, the adherence to screening guidelines, and the practices' efforts to educate patients about the importance of screening.
The analysis considers the impact of social determinants of health on lung cancer outcomes. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, and exposure to environmental hazards can all affect a patient's risk of developing lung cancer and their ability to access care. The Lung Cancer Score considers these factors, giving greater weight to practices that address these social determinants of health.
The Lung Cancer Score also considers the availability of palliative care services. Palliative care focuses on providing comfort and support to patients with serious illnesses. The availability of palliative care specialists, hospice services, and pain management resources is factored into the score. Practices that offer comprehensive palliative care services are ranked higher.
The analysis incorporates data on lung cancer treatment outcomes, such as survival rates and patient satisfaction. This data is used to assess the effectiveness of the healthcare system in treating lung cancer. Practices with better outcomes are ranked higher. The analysis considers the availability of clinical trials, the use of evidence-based treatments, and the practices' commitment to continuous quality improvement.
The Lung Cancer Score is a valuable resource for understanding the healthcare landscape in 42367. It provides a comprehensive assessment of the availability, quality, and accessibility of lung cancer care. This information can be used to improve patient outcomes and promote better health in Powderly.
The analysis recognizes the importance of collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and patients. Practices that actively collaborate with other providers, participate in community outreach programs, and involve patients in their care are ranked higher. The analysis considers the availability of patient advocacy groups, support groups, and educational programs.
The Lung Cancer Score is designed to be a living document, updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare environment. The analysis is based on the best available data and is subject to change as new information becomes available. The goal is to provide a reliable and accurate assessment of the healthcare landscape in 42367.
The final Lung Cancer Score provides a nuanced perspective on the healthcare landscape in Powderly. The score is not a definitive ranking but a comprehensive assessment of the factors that contribute to effective lung cancer care. It is a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
For a visual representation of this data and to explore the healthcare landscape in 42367 and beyond, including geographical distribution of resources and physician locations, visit CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like